SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
By Page Order; ByPageOrder


Home Page / Previous Page/ Next Page/ Expand List / Collapse List Search
PageTitle
1Railroad Cost of Capital – 2002
17Railroad Revenue Adequacy - 2002 Determination . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
19PPL Montana, LLC v. the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
21San Jacinto Rail Limited Construction Exemption and The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company Operation Exemption–Build-out to the Bayport Loop Near Houston, Harris County, TX
39Regulations Governing Fees for Services Performed in Connection with Licensing and Related Services–2003 Update
58Removal of Divisions of Revenue Regulations
60National Classification Committee – Agreement
65EC-Mac Motor Carriers Service Association, Inc..
65Machinery Haulers Association, Inc. - Agreement
65Middlewest Motor Freight Bureau, Inc. - Renewal of Agreement
65Motor Carriers Traffic Association - Agreement
65Nationwide Bulk Trucking Association, Inc. - Agreement .
65Niagara Frontier Tariff Bureau, Inc
65New England Motor Rate Bureau, Inc., The
65Pacific Inland Tariff Bureau, Inc. - Renewal of Agreement
65Rocky Mountain Tariff Bureau, Inc
65Southern Motor Carriers Rate Conference, Inc.
65Western Motor Tariff Bureau, Inc. - Agreement
65Willamette Tariff Bureau, Inc. - Renewal of Agreement
69Arizona Public Service Co. & Pacificorp v. The Burlington Northern and
Santa Fe Railway Company
76Arizona Public Service Co. & Pacificorp v. The Burlington Northern and
Santa Fe Railway Company
83Keokuk Junction Railway Company–Alternative Rail Service–Line of Toledo, Peoria, and Western Railway Corporation
89Duke Energy Corporation v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
205CSX Corporation and CSX Transportation, Inc., Norfolk Southern Corporation and Norfolk Southern Railway Company — Control and Operating Leases/agreements —Conrail Inc. and Consolidated Rail Corporation
220Pejepscot Industrial Park, Inc., d/b/a Grimmel Industries–Petition for Declaratory Order
224Arizona Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. The Burlington Northern and
Santa Fe Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company . . .
232Public Participation in Railroad Abandonment Proceedings
235Carolina Power & Light Company v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
394Duke Energy Corporation v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
402Duke Energy Corporation v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
509Revision of Appellate Procedures and Informal Complaints Regulations
511Regulations Governing Fees for Services Performed In Connection with Licensing and Related Services – 2002 New Fees
521Electronic Filing Option for Certain Documents
526Canadian National Railway Company and Grand Trunk Corporation—
Control —Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company, Bessemer and Lake Erie Railroad Company, and the Pittsburgh & Conneaut Dock Company
526Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company — Trackage Rights — Duluth, Winnipeg and Pacific Railway Company
526Duluth, Winnipeg and Pacific Railway Company — Trackage Rights — Duluth, Missabe and Iron Range Railway Company
576Capitol Materials Incorporated —Petition for Declaratory Order
587Railroad Consolidation Procedures-Exemption For Temporary Trackage Rights
589Public Service Company of Colorado d/b/a Xcel Energy v. The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
742Railroad Cost-of-Capital – 2003
756New York City Economic Development Corporation– Petition for Declaratory
Order
767Railroad Revenue Adequacy - 2003 Determination
769PPL Montana, LLC v. the Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
778TTX Company, et al. — Application for Approval of Pooling of Car Service with Respect to Flatcars
796Procedures to Expedite Resolution of Rail Rate Challenges to Be Considered Under the Stand-Alone Cost Methodology .
799Revision of Exemption Authority Citations
803Texas Municipal Power Agency v. The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
834Granite State Concrete Concrete Co., Inc. and Milford-Bennington Railroad Company, Inc. v. Boston and Maine Corporation, and Springfield Terminal Railway Company
839Regulations Governing Fees for Services Performed in Connection with Licensing and Related Services–2004 Update
862Carolina Power & Light Company v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
862Duke Energy Corporation v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
862Duke Energy Corporation v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
893Keokuk Junction Railway Company-Feeder Line Acquisition–Line of Toledo Peoria, and Western Railway Corporation Between La Harpe and Hollis, Il
920Buckingham Branch Railroad Company — Lease — CSX Transportation, Inc.
933Kansas City Southern—Control—the Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Gateway Eastern Railway Company, and the Texas Mexican Railway Company
1005Railroad Ventures, Inc.–Abandonment Exemption–Between Youngstown, OH, and Darlington, PA, in Mahoning and Columbiana Counties, OH, and Beaver County, PA
1021Arizona Public Service Co. & Pacificorp v. The Burlington Northern and
Santa Fe Railway Company
1029Public Service Company of Colorado d/b/a Xcel Energy v. The Burlington Northern and Santa Fe Railway Company
1041DHX, Inc. v. Matson Navigation Company and Sea-land Service, Inc
1047Index

(The current time in Washington, D.C. is 12:07 AM)
Home Page / Previous Page / Next Page / Expand List / Collapse List
Copies of filings may be downloaded by clicking on the Adobe Acrobat icon.