| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | FD_35293_0 | ||
Case Title:   | PINSLY RAILROAD COMPANY-CONTROL EXEMPTION-WARREN & SALINE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Entire Board | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED PINSLY RAILROAD COMPANY'S PETITION FOR EXEMPTION TO ACQUIRE CONTROL OF WARREN & SALINE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY (WSR) THROUGH THE PURCHASE OF ALL WSR STOCK FROM POTLATCH LAND & LUMBER, LLC. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 15 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 23 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
40308 SERVICE DATE – NOVEMBER 3, 2009 EB SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION STB Finance Docket No. 35293 PINSLY RAILROAD COMPANY–CONTROL EXEMPTION– WARREN & SALINE RIVER RAILROAD COMPANY Decided: October 28, 2009 By petition filed on September 9, 2009, Pinsly Railroad Company (PRC) seeks an exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502 from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323-25 to acquire control of Warren & Saline River Railroad Company (WSR) through the purchase of all WSR stock from Potlatch Land & Lumber, LLC (PLL). PRC seeks expedited action of this petition.[1] The Board will grant the exemption and the request for expedited action. BACKGROUND PRC is a
noncarrier holding company that currently controls five Class III rail
carriers.[2] WSR is a Class III rail carrier, and
wholly-owned subsidiary of PLL, which owns and operates approximately 5 route
miles of rail line extending south and west from PRC states that it executed a Stock
Purchase Agreement with PLL on September 4, 2009, to acquire all of WSR’s
stock and assume control of WSR.[3] Following
consummation, PRC plans to coordinate the rail operations of WSR and AKMD, with
service continuing 5 days per week as traffic warrants. PRC seeks expedited consideration of the
petition so that it can concurrently finalize its acquisition of WSR and PNW no
later than December 30, 2009. In support of its petition, PRC
states that no shipper will lose rail service or any existing competitive
options as a result of the proposed transaction. PRC also states that all WSR traffic, which
currently moves over AKMD’s line out of DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS The acquisition of control of a rail carrier by a person
that is not a rail carrier but that controls any number of rail carriers
requires prior approval by the Board under 49 U.S.C. 11323(a)(5). Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(a), however, the
Board must exempt a transaction or service from regulation if it finds
that: (1) regulation is not necessary to
carry out the rail transportation policy (RTP) of 49 U.S.C. 10101; and (2)
either (a) the transaction or service is limited in scope; or (b) regulation is
not needed to protect shippers from the abuse of market power. An exemption from the prior approval requirements of
49 U.S.C. 11323-25 is consistent with the standards of 49 U.S.C.
10502. Detailed scrutiny of the proposed
transaction through an application for review and approval under 49 U.S.C.
11323-25 is not necessary to carry out the RTP.
Rather, an exemption will promote that policy by minimizing the need for
Federal regulatory control over the proposed transaction, promoting a safe and
efficient rail transportation system, ensuring that a sound rail transportation
system will continue to meet the needs of the shipping public, and reducing
regulatory barriers to entry [49 U.S.C. 10101(2), (3), (4), and (7)]. Also, by allowing PRC to integrate WSR into
its existing family of Class III carriers, with attendant experience,
resources, capital, and administrative support, an exemption will foster sound
economic conditions in transportation, ensure effective competition and
coordination between rail carriers, and encourage efficient management
[49 U.S.C. 10101(5) and (9)]. Other
aspects of the RTP will not be adversely affected. Regulation of this transaction is not needed to protect
shippers from an abuse of market power.
PRC has indicated that there will be no adverse impacts on rail
transportation or lessening of rail competition. PRC will simply be incorporating WSR into its
family of short line carriers without materially changing the operations of
WSR. As a result, shippers potentially
will benefit from greater efficiencies while receiving the same service. No shipper located on WSR’s line is expected
to lose rail service options as a result of the control transaction. The more likely result will be enhanced rail
service, as shippers will benefit from the substantial experience and resources
of PRC and from the connection between WSR and the other PRC-controlled
carriers. Given our finding regarding
the probable effect of the transaction on market power, we need not determine
whether the transaction is limited in scope. Under 49 U.S.C. 10502(g), the Board may not use its exemption authority to relieve a rail carrier of its statutory obligation to protect the interests of its employees. Section 11326(c), however, does not provide for labor protection for transactions under sections 11324 and 11325 that involve only Class III rail carriers. Accordingly, the Board may not impose labor protective conditions here because all the carriers involved are Class III rail carriers. The acquisition of control is exempt from environmental reporting requirements under 49 CFR 1105.6(c)(2)(i) because it will not result in any significant change in carrier operations. Similarly, the transaction is exempt from the historic reporting requirements under 49 CFR 1105.8(b)(3) because it will not substantially change the level of maintenance of railroad properties. In this proceeding, PRC has requested expedited handling of its petition to enable it to consummate the acquisition of control of WSR in conjunction with its acquisition of another Class III carrier, PNW, in a separate proceeding. PRC has requested that its acquisition of WSR become effective no later than December 30, 2009. PRC’s authority to acquire PNW became effective on October 9, 2009. PRC’s request is reasonable in light of the fact that the acquisition of the two Class III carriers was finalized under a single Stock Purchase Agreement. PRC’s request for expedited action will be granted. This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources. It is ordered: 1. Under 49 U.S.C. 10502, the Board exempts from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 11323-25 PRC’s acquisition of control of WSR. 2. PRC’s request for expedited action is granted. 3. Notice will be published in the Federal Register on November 3, 2009. 4. This exemption will be effective on December 3, 2009. Petitions to stay must be filed by November 13, 2009. Petitions to reopen must be filed by November 23, 2009. By the Board, Chairman Elliot, Vice Chairman Nottingham, and Commissioner Mulvey. Anne K. Quinlan Acting Secretary [1] PRC
concurrently filed a verified notice of exemption in Pinsly Railroad
Company–Control Exemption–The Prescott and Northwestern Railroad Company, STB
Finance Docket No. 35292 (STB served Sept. 25, 2009), to obtain control of The
Prescott and Northwestern Railroad Company (PNW), a Class III rail carrier,
through the purchase of all PNW’s stock from PLL. That exemption became effective on
October 9, 2009. [2] These carriers
are: Pioneer Valley Railroad Company,
Inc. (PVR), which operates in Massachusetts; Florida Central Railroad Company,
Inc. (FCR), Florida Midland Railroad Company, Inc. (FMR), and Florida Northern
Railroad Company, Inc. (FNR), each of which operates in Florida; and Arkansas
Midland Railroad Company, Inc. (AKMD), which operates several disconnected line
segments in Arkansas. | |||