| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | AB_6_463_x | ||
Case Title:   | BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY--ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION--IN KING COUNTY, WA | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED KING COUNTY, WA'S REQUEST TO EXTEND THE NOTICE OF INTERIM TRAIL USE OR ABANDONMENT NEGOTIATING PERIOD UNTIL APRIL 20, 2010. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 66 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 45 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
40335 SERVICE DATE – NOVEMBER 3, 2009 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION STB Docket No. AB-6 (Sub-No. 463X) Decided: November 2, 2009 BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) filed a
notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1152 Subpart F—Exempt Abandonments to
abandon a 7.30-mile rail line located between milepost 0.0 at Woodinville
and milepost 7.30 at By decision and notice of interim trail use or abandonment (NITU) served on October 27, 2008 (October 2008 decision), the proceeding was reopened and the exemption was made subject to environmental and historic preservation conditions,[1] as well as a trail use condition authorizing a 180-day period, until April 25, 2009, for King County, WA (King County) to negotiate an interim trail use/rail banking agreement with BNSF. By decision served May 12, 2009, the NITU negotiating period was extended until October 22, 2009. In a motion filed on October 20,
2009, Where, as here, the carrier has not
consummated the abandonment at the end of the previously imposed negotiating
period and has indicated its willingness to continue negotiations by agreeing
to an extension, the Board retains jurisdiction and the NITU negotiating period
may be extended.[2] Under the circumstances, further extension of
the negotiating period is warranted. See
Birt v. STB, 90 F.3d 580, 588-90 (D.C.
Cir. 1996); This decision will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources. It is ordered: 1. 2. The NITU negotiating period is extended until April 20, 2010.
3. This decision is effective on its service date. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. Anne K. Quinlan Acting Secretary [1] By decision
served on April 6, 2009, the section 106 historic preservation condition was
removed and a new environmental condition recommended by SEA was imposed in
this proceeding. This new condition and
the other environmental conditions, as originally imposed in the October 2008
decision, remain in effect. | |||