| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | AB_57_58_X | ||
Case Title:   | SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY D/B/A CANADIAN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY-ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION-IN WAUKESHA AND MILWAUKEE COUNTIES, WI | ||
Decision Type:   | Environmental Review | ||
Deciding Body:   | Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | CONCLUDED THAT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROCESS IS UNNECESSARY AND INVITED PUBLIC COMMENT. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 25 KB 141 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 1 Minutes | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
40321 SERVICE DATE – NOVEMBER 6, 2009 SEA SURFACE
TRANSPORTATION BOARD
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT STB DOCKET NO. AB-57 (Sub-No. 58X) Soo
Line Railroad Company D/B/A Canadian Pacific Railway Company - Abandonment
Exemption – In BACKGROUND In this
proceeding, the Soo Line Railroad
Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway Company (Soo Line) filed a notice
of exemption under 49 CFR 1152.50 seeking exemption from the requirements of 49
U.S.C. 10903 in connection with the abandonment of a 4,458 +/- foot rail line
in Waukesha and Milwaukee Counties,
Wisconsin. The line extends
between milepost 94.04 +/-, which is southeast of ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Soo Line submitted an Environmental Report that concludes the quality of the human environment would not be affected significantly as a result of the abandonment or any post-abandonment activities, including salvage and disposition of the right-of-way. Soo Line served the Environmental Report on a number of appropriate Federal, state, and local agencies as required by the Surface Transportation Board’s (Board) environmental rules [49 CFR 1105.7(b)].[1] The Board’s Section of Environmental Analysis (SEA) has reviewed and investigated the record in this proceeding. Diversion of Traffic Soo Line states that no local traffic has moved over the line for at least two years and that any overhead traffic has already been rerouted over other lines. Accordingly, the proposed abandonment would not adversely impact the development, use, and transportation of energy resources or recyclable commodities; transportation of ozone-depleting materials; or result in the diversion of rail traffic to truck traffic that could result in significant impacts to air quality or the local transportation network. Salvage Activities According
to Soo Line, the line was originally developed in 1864 by the Impacts from salvage and disposal of a rail line typically include removal of tracks and ties, removal of ballast, dismantling of any bridges or structures that may be present on the rail right-of-way, and regrading of the right-of-way. Salvage may be performed within the right-of-way, or, if necessary, via the construction of new access points to the right-of-way. Soo Line intends to salvage rail, ties, and track materials from the line, and these ties and rails would either be recycled or disposed of in an appropriate manner. The railroad has no plans to remove the bridges on the line. The National Geodetic Survey (NGS) identified
one geodetic station marker in the area of the proposed abandonment, and has
requested notification at least 90 days in advance of any activities that would
disturb or destroy this marker in order to plan for its relocation. Accordingly, we recommend that Soo
Line consult with NGS and notify NGS at
least 90 days prior to beginning salvage activities that will disturb or
destroy any geodetic station markers. A portion of the line is located in There are no known hazardous waste sites or
hazardous material spills on the right-of-way.
However, there is a 16-inch petroleum pipeline that crosses the
right-of-way, and information from the Wisconsin Department of Natural
Resources (WDNR) indicates that a petroleum release from the pipeline occurred
in approximately 1986, from a point located north of the right-of-way. This petroleum release, which did not affect
the right-of-way, was remediated and the WDNR closed the case in July
2002. Accordingly, no mitigation
regarding hazardous waste sites or hazardous material spills is recommended. Soo Line has
no plans to undertake in-stream work and states that the proposed project would
not involve any discharge of dredge or fill material into Federal,
jurisdictional wetlands or waters. In
addition, Soo Line states that, if abandonment authority is granted, it will
take proper care during salvage activities to prevent any impact on water
quality. The U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers’ St. Paul District (Corps) has reviewed the proposed abandonment and
determined that a Corps permit under Section 402 of the Clean Water Act (33
U.S.C. 1342) would not be required. However, because Underwood Creek and its
tributaries and adjacent wetlands are located near or within the project area, the
Corps has requested consultation before the railroad performs any work (such as
constructing access roads, stating areas or disposal sites) beyond the foot
print of the existing ballast and in the vicinity of any wetlands. Accordingly, we recommend that the railroad consult
with the Corps before performing any work, such as constructing access roads,
staging areas or disposal sites, beyond the foot print of the existing ballast
and in the vicinity of any wetlands. Based on all information available to date, SEA does not believe that salvage activities would cause significant environmental impacts. Additional Comments The
City of HISTORIC REVIEW Soo Line submitted an Historic Report as required by
the Board’s environmental rules [49 CFR 1105.8(a)] and served the report
on the Wisconsin Historical Society (State Historic Preservation Office or SHPO) pursuant to 49 CFR
1105.8(c). In the Historic Report, the
railroad states that there are two
bridges on the line that are 50 years old or older, and Soo Line believes that
these structures were built before 1918.
The first bridge, located at milepost 93.30, is a three-span steel open
deck plate girder construction. The
second bridge, located at milepost 93.80, is a three-span concrete ballasted
deck plate girder construction. Other
than routine maintenance, neither bridge has undergone major alteration since
the mid-1980s. According to Soo Line,
salvage operations will be limited to removal of the tracks and track materials
from these bridges. At the time of this EA, the
SHPO had not submitted comments and, therefore, SEA has not been able to
consider the SHPO’s opinion before determining whether the proposed project
could affect historic properties. Accordingly, we are recommending a condition requiring Soo Line to retain its interest in and take no steps
to alter the historic integrity of all historic properties including sites, buildings,
structures and objects within the project right-of-way (the Area of Potential
Effect) eligible for listing or listed in the National Register of Historic
Places until completion of the Section 106 process. Guidance regarding the Board’s historic
preservation review process is available on the Board’s website at http://www.stb.dot.gov/stb/environment/preservation.html. Pursuant to 36 CFR 800.2, SEA
conducted a search of the Native American Consultation Database at http://home.nps.gov/nacd/ to identify
Federally-recognized tribes, which may have ancestral connections to the
project area. The database indicated
that the following Federally-recognized tribes may have knowledge regarding
properties of traditional religious and cultural significance within the
right-of-way (the APE) of the proposed abandonment: Citizen Potawatomi Nation, CONDITIONS SEA recommends that the following environmental conditions be placed on any decision granting abandonment authority: 1. The Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway Company shall consult with the National Geodetic Survey (NGS) and notify NGS at least 90 days prior to beginning salvage activities that will disturb or destroy any geodetic station markers. 2. The Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway Company shall consult with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ St. Paul District before performing any work, such as constructing access roads, stating areas or disposal sites, beyond the foot print of the existing ballast and in the vicinity of any wetlands. 3. The Soo Line Railroad Company d/b/a Canadian Pacific Railway Company (Soo Line) shall retain its interest in and shall take no steps to alter the historic integrity of all historic properties including sites, buildings, structures, and objects within the project right-of-way (the Area of Potential Effect) that are eligible for listing or listed in the National Register of Historic Places until the Section 106 process of the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470f, has been completed. Soo Line shall report back to the Board’s Section of Environmental Analysis regarding any consultations with the Wisconsin Historical Society (State Historic Preservation Office or SHPO) and the public. Soo Line may not file its consummation notice or initiate any salvage activities related to abandonment (including removal of tracks and ties) until the Section 106 process has been completed and the Board has removed this condition. CONCLUSIONS Based on the information provided from all sources to date, SEA concludes that, as currently proposed, and if the recommended conditions are imposed, abandonment of the line would not significantly affect the quality of the human environment. Therefore, the environmental impact statement process is unnecessary. Alternatives to the proposed abandonment would include denial (and therefore no change in operations), discontinuance of service without abandonment, and continued operation by another operator. In any of these cases, the existing quality of the human environment and energy consumption should not be affected. PUBLIC USE Following abandonment and salvage of the line, the right-of-way may be suitable for other public use. A request containing the requisite four-part showing for imposition of a public use condition (49 CFR 1152.28) must be filed with the Board and served on the railroad within the time specified in the Federal Register notice. TRAILS USE A request for a notice of interim trail use (NITU) is due to the Board, with a copy to the railroad, within 10 days of publication of the notice for exemption in the Federal Register. Nevertheless, the Board will accept late-filed requests as long as it retains jurisdiction to do so in a particular case. This request must comply with the Board's rules for use of rights-of-way as trails (49 CFR 1152.29). PUBLIC ASSISTANCE The
Board’s Office of Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance responds
to questions regarding interim trail use, public use, and other reuse
alternatives. You may contact this
office directly at (202) 245-0238, or mail inquiries to Surface Transportation
Board, Office of Public Assistance, Governmental Affairs, and Compliance, COMMENTS If you
wish to file comments regarding this EA, send an original and two copies
to Surface Transportation Board, Case Control Unit, Date made available to the public: November 6, 2009. Comment due date: November 23, 2009. By the Board, Victoria Rutson, Chief, Section of Environmental Analysis. Anne K. Quinlan Acting Secretary Attachment [1] The
Environmental and Historic Reports are available for viewing on the Board’s website
at www.stb.dot.gov by going to “E-Library,”
selecting “Filings,” and then conducting a search for AB-57 (Sub-No. 58X). | |||