| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | AB_57_55_X | ||
Case Title:   | SOO LINE RAILROAD COMPANY--ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION--IN MILWAUKEE COUNTY, WI | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED REQUEST OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION TO EXTEND THE NITU NEGOTIATING PERIOD TO NOVEMBER 5, 2005. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 9 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 17 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
36161 SERVICE DATE – SEPTEMBER 2, 2005 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION STB Docket No. AB-57 (Sub-No. 55X) Decided: September 1, 2005 By decision
and notice of interim trail use or abandonment (NITU) served on February 8,
2005 (February 2005 decision), the Board, under 49 U.S.C. 10502 exempted from
the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10903 the abandonment by the Soo
Line Railroad Company (Soo Line) of a 5-mile
line of railroad known as the West Allis Line, extending from milepost 88.2 +/-
(near the State Highway 41 crossing in Milwaukee) to milepost 93.2 +/- (near
North 123rd Street in Wauwatosa), in Milwaukee County, WI, subject to trail
use, environmental and standard employee protective conditions. The February 2005 decision authorized the
Wisconsin Department of Transportation (WisDOT), on behalf of the Wisconsin
Department of Natural Resources (WisDNR), to negotiate with Soo Line for
interim trail use/rail banking for the 5-mile line under the National Trails
System Act, 16 U.S.C. 1247(d) (Trails Act).
The NITU negotiating period expired on On August 30, 2005, WisDOT, on behalf of WisDNR, filed a request for a 90-day extension of the NITU negotiating period. WisDOT states that negotiations are continuing between the parties but more time is needed to finalize negotiations. Soo Line filed its response on August 31, 2005, stating that it agrees to the extension request to complete negotiations. Where, as
here, the carrier has not consummated the abandonment at the end of the
previously imposed negotiating period and is willing to continue trail use
negotiations, the Board retains jurisdiction and the NITU negotiating period
may be extended. Under the
circumstances, an extension of the negotiating period is warranted. See Birt v. STB, 90 F.3d 580,
588-90 (D.C. Cir. 1996); Grantwood Village v. Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., 95
F.3d 654, 659 (8th Cir. 1996), cert. denied, 519 This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources. It is ordered: 1. The request to extend the NITU negotiating period is granted. 2. The NITU negotiating period is extended to 3. This decision is effective on its date of service. By the Board, David M. Konschnik, Director, Office of Proceedings. Secretary | |||