| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | NOR_42090_0 | ||
Case Title:   | WTL RAIL CORPORATION--PETITION FOR DECLARATORY RELIEF | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Secretary | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | CONTINUED THE PROCEEDING IN ABEYANCE UNTIL JUNE 17, 2005, TO ALLOW THE PARTIES ADDITIONAL TIME TO CONDUCT SETTLEMENT DISCUSSIONS. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 6 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 15 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
35885 SERVICE DATE – LATE RELEASE SEC SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION STB Docket No. 42090 WTL RAIL CORPORATION–PETITION FOR
DECLARATORY RELIEF Ex Parte
No. 230 (Sub-No. 8)[1] IMPROVEMENT OF TOFC/COFC REGULATION– WTL RAIL CORPORATION PETITION FOR PARTIAL REVOCATION OF EXEMPTION Decided: On December 14, 2004, WTL Rail
Corporation (WTL) filed a petition under 5 U.S.C. 554(e) and 49 U.S.C. 721
seeking a declaratory ruling from the Board that: (1) certain practices of CSX Transportation,
Inc. (CSXT) constitute an unreasonable practice in violation of 49 U.S.C. 10702
and 10704(a)(1); and (2) CSXT’s refusal to use WTL’s trailers as part of its 48-foot trailer fleet
jeopardizes CSXT’s ability to fulfill its car service
obligations under 49 U.S.C. 11121-22.
WTL seeks a cease and desist order. WTL also asks that the Board compel CSXT to
use WTL’s trailers and set a “default” rate for
trailer compensation in the event the parties are unable to reach terms through
negotiation. WTL concurrently filed a
petition under 49 U.S.C. 10502(d) and 49 CFR 1121.1, et seq. for
partial revocation of the class exemption adopted in Improvement of
TOFC/COFC Regulation, 364 I.C.C. 731 (1981). By decision served on In a letter filed on The request to continue to hold
these proceedings in abeyance is reasonable and will be granted. The parties are directed to report back to
the Board on It is ordered: 1. These proceedings will be held in abeyance
until 2. This decision is effective on the date
served. By the Board, Secretary | |||