| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | AB_103_21_X | ||
Case Title:   | THE KANSAS CITY SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY-ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION-LINE IN WARREN COUNTY, MS | ||
Decision Type:   | Environmental Review | ||
Deciding Body:   | Chief Of Section Of Environmental Analysis | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | CONCLUDED THAT THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT PROCESS IS UNNECESSARY AND INVITED PUBLIC COMMENT. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 141 KB 27 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 1 Minutes | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
38345 SERVICE
DATE – OCTOBER 23, 2007 SEA SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD WASHINGTON,
DC 20423 ENVIRONMENTAL
ASSESSMENT STB Docket No. AB-103
(Sub-No. 21X) The Kansas City Southern Railway Company – Abandonment Exemption – Line in Warren County, MS STB Docket No. AB-1016X Vicksburg Southern Railroad, Inc. – Discontinuance of Service Exemption – Line in Warren County,
MS BACKGROUND In this proceeding, the Kansas City Southern Railway Company
(KCSR) and the Vicksburg Southern Railroad, Inc., (VSOR)(collectively
Applicants), jointly filed their respective petitions under 49 U.S.C. 10502 for
exemption from the provisions of 49 U.S.C. 10903. In this proceeding, KCSR seeks to abandon and
VSOR seeks to discontinue service over the Vicksburg Industrial Lead (also
known as the South Redwood Branch or Redwood Branch), between milepost 225.6,
south of the Line’s crossing of Warrenton Road and milepost 229.85,
approximately 0.05 miles south of the Line’s crossing of Glass Road, a distance
of 4.25 miles in Warren County, MS. The Line
traverses United States Postal Service Zip Code 39180 and the right-of-way is
approximately 100 feet in width. The
topography is generally urban in nature but also includes some forests and
farmland. A map depicting the Line in relationship
to the area served is appended to this Environmental Assessment (EA). If the petition becomes effective, KCRS would
be able to salvage track, ties and other railroad appurtenances and to dispose
of the right-of-way. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Applicants have submitted an environmental report that
concludes the quality of the human environment would not be affected
significantly as a result of the abandonment or any post-abandonment
activities, including salvage and disposition of the right-of-way. That Applicants have served the environmental
report on a number of appropriate Federal, state, and local agencies as
required by the Surface Transportation Board’s (Board) environmental rules [49
CFR 1105.7(b)]. The Board’s Section of
Environmental Analysis (SEA) has reviewed and investigated the record in this
proceeding. The Applicants state that the Line
currently serves a single shipper, Foam Packaging, Inc., which receives inbound
rail traffic at a rail spur located near milepost 227.5. At this point, Foam Packaging reloads the
inbound rail traffic onto trucks and transports it roughly one mile to its
plant, which is not directly served by rail.
All inbound rail loads to Foam Packaging, which account for all recent
rail traffic on the Line, consist of plastic pellets, specifically polystyrene,
which is a non-hazardous commodity. Foam
Packaging uses this material in its manufacture of foam sheets and container
products. The Applicants state that the Line
is stub-ended and leased by KCSR to VSOR, a Class III short line carrier that has
operated the Line since January 2006.
The Applicants’ records indicate that Foam Packaging received 55
carloads in 2004, 49 carloads in 2005, 57 carloads in 2006, and 28 carloads as
of August 28, 2007. Because Foam Packaging
currently transloads inbound polystyrene onto trucks
to its final destination to it’s plant, the
abandonment and discontinuance should result in minor impacts to Foam Packaging. Foam Packaging would continue to receive its
materials via other portions of the Applicant’s lines that are still in service.
Furthermore, the Applicants state that they would work with Foam Packaging to
relocate its truck transfer operations to another suitable railhead in the area. In its submittal, the Applicants state that the abandonment
and discontinuance, if approved, would not impact regional and/or local
transportation rail systems or patterns or the diversion of rail traffic to
other modes. The abandonment and
discontinuance, if approved, would also improve local roadway safety with the
elimination of two public and three private at-grade crossings. In a filing dated October 15, 2007,
Foam Packaging states that does not oppose the Applicant’s desire to abandon
and discontinue service over the Line.
However, it strongly opposes the loss of rail service. Therefore, Foam Packaging seeks to purchase
the Line and requests that the Board not to exempt the Applicants from the
offer of financial assistance process. According to the Applicants, a
majority of the Line is located within the City of Vicksburg, MS (City), and,
at various points has been zoned as heavy industrial, general commercial, mixed
use residential, single family residential, commercial planned unit
development, and agricultural/industrial.
Additionally, in the Applicants submittal, an article
appearing in the September 24, 2007, edition of The Vicksburg Post, and also in a filing submitted by Foam Packaging
dated October 15, 2007, KCSR has entered into a three-way, $ 1 million dollar transaction
to transfer 156 acres of its property that is part of this proposed action for
the development of a Lakes Entertainment (Lakes) resort casino. The deal was recently approved by the City
via resolution. In the land deal
approved by the City, Lakes would receive 104 acres of the KCSR right-of-way
and the City would use the remaining 52 acres for conversion into a
rails-to-trails project. If the abandonment is approved, KCSR
anticipates conveying its interesting the right-of-way for use as a trail to
the City. The only reasonable
alternative to abandonment would be to allow the Line to remain in place while
handling a small about of rail traffic that can be handles by another close by
location. SEA notes that in general, that if the abandonment and
discontinuance is approved, that salvage would likely entail removal of the
rail, other track material, and ties from the right-of-way. Salvage
operations are normally conducted entirely within the right-of-way by use
of rail mounted equipment that removes the spikes and plates that hold the
rails to the ties. After the rail, ties
and other track material are removed, a vehicle equipped with magnets is
generally used to travel over the right-of-way to remove any remaining spikes
or plates inadvertently left behind. At that time, any ties or parts of
ties left behind would be removed. The ballast
and sub-ballast would remain undisturbed.
The Applicants state that they do not intend to perform any activities
that would cause sedimentation or erosion of the soil and does not anticipate
any dredging or use of fill in removal or track material. Furthermore, no debris would be discarded
along the right-of-way nor placed or left in streams or wetlands, or along the
banks of such waterways. Any work along
the right-of-way would also be subject to appropriate measures to prevent or
control spills from fuels, lubricants or any other pollutant materials. The Applicants note that they
believe that the proposed abandonment and discontinuance is consistent with
existing land use plans. In fact, the
Applicants proposed action was precipitated by plans by the City to convert the
Line’s right-of-way to recreational or other uses, as described above. The Applicants state that they are
not aware of any hazardous waste sites or sites on the Line where any hazardous
materials spills have occurred. In a letter dated August 13, 2007,
Ms. Willa Henriksen, Bureau Director, Wetland
Permitting, Mississippi Department of Marine Resources, writes that the project,
as proposed, does not appear likely to cause direct or indirect impacts to
coastal wetlands. In a letter dates August 10, 2007, Mr. David Felder, Fish
and Wildlife Biologist, Fish and Wildlife Service, Mississippi Field Office,
states that no impacts to any federal listed species are likely to occur as a
result of the proposed project. The
Applicants also state that they are not aware of any wildlife sanctuary or
refuge, or any National or State park or forest adjacent to the Line. In a letter dated August 14, 2007, Mr. Homer Wilkes, State
Conservationist, Natural Resources Conservation Service, states that no prime
farmland would be impacted. That Applicants state that they believe that no permits
under section 404 of the Clean Water Act would be required because no salvage
activities are anticipated in or adjacent to any waterways and 100 year flood
plains would be impacted. SEA believes that any air emissions
associated with salvage operations would be temporary and would not have a
significant impact on air quality. Noise
associated with salvage activities would also be temporary and should not have
a significant impact on the area surrounding the proposed abandonment. The
U.S. Department of Commerce, National Geodetic Survey (NGS) has not completed
its review of the proposed abandonment. Therefore,
SEA has added NGS to the service list for this EA and specifically invites NGS’s comments on this EA. Based on all information available to date, SEA does not
believe that salvage activities would cause significant environmental
impacts. SEA is providing a copy of this
EA to the following agencies for review and comment: National Park
Service, Southeast Regional Office; U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Vicksburg District,
and the Mississippi Department of Environmental Quality, Office of Pollution
Control. HISTORIC REVIEW In its Historic Report, the Applicants state that the Line
was originally constructed by the Louisville, New Orleans & Texas Railway (LNO&T)
as part of a through route between Memphis, TN, and New Orleans, LA, via Vicksburg,
MS, and Baton Rouge, LA, which was completed in about 1884. The Yazoo & Mississippi Valley Railroad
(Y&MV), a subsidiary of the Illinois Central Railroad (IC), merged with the
LNO&T, with Y&MV becoming the surviving carrier. The Y&MV was itself later merged into the
IC. In 1972 the IC became the Illinois
Central Gulf Railroad (ICG) following IC’s merger with the Gulf, Mobile &
Ohio Railroad. Over time, portions of
the LNO&T Memphis-New Orleans route were abandoned, resulting in an
approximately 19 mile branch line from Redwood, MS, the southernmost 4.5 miles
which is now the Line that is the subject of this abandonment proceeding. In 1986, MidSouth Rail
Corporation (MidSouth) acquired the Line, along with
other lines, from ICG. The KCSR acquired
control of MidSouth in 1993, subsequently merging
with MidSouth, with KCSR as the surviving
entity. KCSR leased the Line to VSOR in
early 2006. In light of VSOR’s current lease and operation of the Line, the proposed
abandonment would not effect any change in KCSR’s
operations. The Applicants state that there are three bridges on the
Line that are 50 years old or older. According to the Applicants, the
bridges are located at milepost’s 228.6, 228.9, and 229.8 and were originally
constructed by railroads historically unaffiliated with KCSR. KCSR acquired the bridges as part of its
acquisition of MidSouth in 1993. According to the Applicants, the bridge located at milepost
228.6 was constructed in 1952, the bridge located at milepost 228.9 was
constructed in 1948, while the main span located at milepost 229.8 was
constructed in 1923 and was rebuilt in 1966.
However, the Applicants believe all of the bridges are of common design
and construction and is therefore not likely to be of historical
significance. The
Applicants state that they know of no historic sites or structures or
archeological resources on the Line or within the proposed project area. The Applicants served the historic report on
the Mississippi Department of Archives & History, State Historic
Preservation Officer (SHPO), pursuant to 49 CFR 1105.8(c).[1]
In a letter dated August 3, 2007,
the SHPO states that it has
determined that no cultural resources would be adversely affected. Pursuant to the Section 106 regulations of the National Historic
Preservation Act at 36 CFR 800.4(d)(1), and following consultation with the
SHPO, the Applicants, and the public, we have determined that the proposed
abandonment would not affect historic properties listed in or eligible for
inclusion in the National Register. The
documentation for this finding, as specified at 36 CFR 800.11(d), consists of
the railroad’s historic report, all relevant correspondence, and this EA, which
have been provided to the SHPO and made available to the public through posting
on the Board’s website at http://www.stb.dot.gov. Pursuant to 36 CFR 800.2, SEA
conducted a search of the Native American Consultation Database at http://home.nps.gov/nacd to identify Federally recognized tribes, which may have ancestral
connections to the project area. The
database indicated that the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians of North Carolina may
have an interest in the proposed abandonment and discontinuance. Accordingly, SEA is sending a copy of this EA to the
Tribe for review and comment. Based on all information available to date, SEA does not
believe that salvage activities would cause significant environmental
impacts. CONDITIONS We recommend that no conditions be
imposed on any decision granting abandonment authority. CONCLUSIONS Based on the information provided from all sources to date,
SEA concludes that, as currently proposed that abandonment of the line would
not significantly affect the quality of the human environment. Therefore, the environmental impact statement
process is unnecessary. Alternatives to the proposed abandonment would include
denial (and therefore no change in operations), discontinuance of service
without abandonment, and continued operation by another operator. In any of these cases, the existing quality
of the human environment and energy consumption should not be affected. PUBLIC USE Following abandonment and salvage of the rail line, the
right-of-way may be suitable for other public use. A request containing the requisite four-part
showing for imposition of a public use condition (49 CFR 1152.28) must be filed
with the Board and served on the railroad within the time specified in the Federal
Register notice. KCSR states that the Line is suitable for other public
purposes and anticipates conveying the right-of-way to the City of Vicksburg,
MS, for such purposes. TRAILS USE A request for a notice of interim trail use (NITU) is due
to the Board, with a copy to the railroad, within 10 days of publication of the
notice of exemption in the Federal Register. Nevertheless, the Board will accept
late-filed requests as long as it retains jurisdiction to do so in a particular
case. This request must comply with the
Board’s rules for use of rights-of-way as trails (49 CFR 1152.29). If the abandonment is approved, KCSR anticipates conveying
its interesting the right-of-way for use as a trail to the City. The only reasonable alternative to
abandonment would be to allow the Line to remain in place while handling a
small about of rail traffic that can be handles by another close by
location. In a letter dated October 5, 2007, KCSR states that it
willing to enter into negotiations with the City of Vicksburg, MS, regarding
trails use for the entire right-of-way. PUBLIC ASSISTANCE The Board’s Office of Public Services (OPS) responds to
questions regarding interim trail use, public use, and other reuse
alternatives. You may contact OPS
directly at (202) 245-0230, or mail inquiries to Surface Transportation Board,
Office of Public Services, Washington, DC 20423. COMMENTS If you wish to file comments regarding this Environmental Assessment,
send an original and two copies to Surface Transportation Board, Case
Control Unit, Washington, DC 20423, to the attention of Troy Brady, who
prepared this Environmental Assessment.
Environmental comments may also be filed electronically on the Board=s web site, www.stb.dot.gov, by clicking on the “E-FILING”
link. Please refer to Docket No. AB-103
(Sub-No. 21X) and AB-1016X) in all correspondence, including e-filings,
addressed to the Board. If you have
any questions regarding this Environmental Assessment, please contact Troy
Brady, the environmental contact for this case, by phone at (202) 245-0301, fax
at (202) 245-0454, or e-mail at Troy.Brady@stb.dot.gov. Date made available to the public: October 23 2007. Comment due date: November
23, 2007. By the Board, Victoria Rutson, Chief, Section of Environmental
Analysis. Vernon A. Williams Secretary Attachment [1]
Guidance regarding
the Board’s historic preservation review process is available on the Board’s
web site at http://www.stb.dot.gov/stb/environment/preservation.html. | |||