40555                      SERVICE DATE – LATE RELEASE JANUARY 29, 2010

DO

 

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

 

DECISION

 

STB Docket No. AB-1004X

 

SHANNON TRANSPORT, INC.—ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION—

IN CLARION COUNTY, PA

 

Decided:  January 29, 2010

 

Shannon Transport, Inc. (STI), filed a notice of exemption under 49 CFR 1152 Subpart F–Exempt Abandonments to abandon approximately 12.5 miles of rail line, extending between milepost 6.0 and milepost 4.0 in or near Lawsonham, and the connecting line between milepost 0.0 near Lawsonham and milepost 10.5 near Sligo, in Clarion County, PA (line).  Notice of the exemption was served and published in the Federal Register (72 FR 35546-47) on June 28, 2007 (June 2007 notice).[1] 

 

By decision and notice of interim trail use or abandonment (NITU) served on July 27, 2007 (July 2007 decision), the proceeding was reopened and a 180-day period was authorized for Allegheny Valley Land Trust (Allegheny Valley) to negotiate an interim trail use/rail banking agreement with STI for the right-of-way involved in this proceeding pursuant to the National Trails System Act, 16 U.S.C. 1247(d) (Trails Act).[2]  The negotiating period under the NITU was extended by several decisions, with the most recent decision served on July 28, 2009.  The latest NITU extension expired on January 13, 2010.

 

By letter filed on January 20, 2010, Allegheny Valley requests an additional 180-day extension of the NITU negotiating period.  Allegheny Valley states that a sales agreement has been reached and that Allegheny Valley is securing the insurance required by the agreement.  Allegheny Valley further states that the extension will allow time for a survey of the corridor to be completed and entered into the transaction.  On January 14, 2010 (prior to the receipt of Allegheny Valley’s extension request), the Board received a letter from STI stating that it is agreeable to a 180-day extension of the NITU negotiating period.

 

Where, as here, the carrier has not consummated the abandonment at the end of the previously imposed negotiating period and is willing to continue trail use negotiations, the Board retains jurisdiction and the NITU negotiating period may be extended.[3]  Under the circumstances, further extension of the negotiating period is warranted.  See Birt v. STB, 90 F.3d 580, 588-90 (D.C. Cir. 1996); Grantwood Village v. Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., 95 F.3d 654, 659 (8th Cir. 1996).  An extension of the NITU negotiating period will promote the establishment of trail use and rail banking consistent with the Trails Act.  Accordingly, the NITU negotiating period will be extended for an additional 180 days from January 13, 2010, to July 12, 2010.

 

This decision will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources.

 

It is ordered:

 

1.  Allegheny Valley’s request to extend the NITU negotiating period for an additional 180 days is granted.

 

2.  The negotiating period under the NITU is extended to July 12, 2010.

 

3.  This decision is effective on its service date.

 

By the Board, Joseph H. Dettmar, Acting Director, Office of Proceedings.