| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | NOR_42122_0 | ||
Case Title:   | NRG POWER MARKETING LLC V. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS PROCEEDING. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 25 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 35 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
40840 SERVICE
DATE – LATE RELEASE JUNE 4, 2010 DO SURFACE
TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. NOR
42122 NRG POWER MARKETING
LLC v. CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. MOTION FOR
PROTECTIVE ORDER Decided: June 4, 2010 This
decision establishes a protective order for this proceeding. NRG Power Marketing LLC (NRG)
challenges the reasonableness of rates established by CSX Transportation, Inc.
(CSXT), for the transportation of coal from On May 25, 2010, NRG filed a motion for protective order with respect to evidentiary submissions and discovery. On May 28, 2010, NRG and CSXT (the parties) filed a letter stating that they had agreed on terms for a protective order in this proceeding that differed from those originally proposed by NRG in its May 25, 2010 motion. NRG withdrew the proposed protective order attached to its motion, and the parties jointly request that the Board enter a protective order in the form provided as an appendix to the parties’ May 28, 2010 letter. The proposed protective order, as set out in the
appendix to this decision, is consistent with the protective orders entered by
the Board in recent rate proceedings.[1] It includes provisions governing the
production of highly confidential material and other related provisions
required by Procedures to Expedite Resolution of Rail Rate Challenges to Be
Considered Under the Stand-Alone Cost Methodology, 6 S.T.B. 805 (2003) and EP 638
(STB served June 6, 2003). The
protective order also stipulates that the protected exchange of material will
not be deemed a violation of 49 U.S.C. § 11904. Finally, as an adaptation designed to avoid
the need for routine, unopposed motions to compel the disclosure of
confidential contracts related to the dispute, the protective order (at
paragraph 7) specifically provides for the production of such contracts to
enable a more efficient discovery process. Good cause exists to grant the
request for protective order. The
unrestricted disclosure of confidential, proprietary, or commercially sensitive
material could cause serious competitive injury. Issuance of the requested protective order
will ensure that the material, produced in response to a discovery request or
otherwise, will be used only in connection with this proceeding and not for any
other business or commercial purpose.
The motion conforms with 49 C.F.R. § 1104.14 governing
requests for protective orders to maintain confidentiality of materials
submitted to the Board, and 49 C.F.R. § 1114.21(c) governing
protective orders regarding discovery.
Accordingly, the request for protective order will be granted. This decision will not
significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the
conservation of energy resources. It
is ordered: 1.
The parties’ request for protective order is granted. 2.
The parties are directed to comply with the protective order in the
appendix to this decision. 3. This decision is effective on its service
date. By
the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. APPENDIX PROTECTIVE ORDER 1. Any party producing information, data, documents or other
material (hereinafter collectively referred to as “material”) in discovery to
another party to this proceeding, or submitting material in pleadings, that the
party in good faith believes reflects proprietary or confidential information,
may designate and stamp such material as “CONFIDENTIAL,” and such material must
be treated as confidential. Such
material, any copies, and any data or notes derived therefrom: (a) Shall be used solely for the purpose of this proceeding and any
judicial review proceeding arising herefrom, and not for any other business,
commercial, or competitive purpose. (b) May be disclosed only to employees, counsel, or agents of the
party requesting such material who have a need to know, handle, or review the
material for purposes of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding
arising herefrom, and only where such employee, counsel, or agent has been
given and has read a copy of this Protective Order, agrees to be bound by its
terms, and executes the attached Undertaking for Confidential Material prior to
receiving access to such materials. (c) Must be destroyed by the requesting party, its employees,
counsel, and agents, at the completion of this proceeding and any judicial
review proceeding arising herefrom.
However, outside counsel and consultants for a party are permitted to
retain file copies of all pleadings filed with the Board. (d) If contained in any pleading filed with the Board shall, in
order to be kept confidential, be filed only in pleadings submitted in a
package clearly marked on the outside “Confidential Materials Subject to
Protective Order.” See 49 C.F.R.
§ 1104.14. 2. Any party producing material in discovery to another party
to this proceeding, or submitting material in pleadings, may in good faith
designate and stamp particular material, such as material containing specific
rate, traffic, or cost data or other competitively sensitive information, as
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.” If any party
wishes to challenge such designation, the party may bring such matter to the
attention of the Board. Material that is
so designated may be disclosed only to outside counsel or outside consultants
of the party requesting such materials who have a need to know, handle, or
review the materials for purposes of this proceeding and any judicial review
proceeding arising herefrom, provided that such outside counsel or outside
consultants have been given and have read a copy of this Protective Order,
agree to be bound by its terms, and execute the attached Undertaking for Highly
Confidential Material prior to receiving access to such materials. Material designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
and produced in discovery under this provision shall be subject to all of the
other provisions of this Protective Order, including without limitation
paragraph 1. 3. In the event that a party produces material which should
have been designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” and
inadvertently fails to designate the material as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL,” the producing party may notify the other party in writing within
5 days of the producing party’s discovery of its inadvertent failure to make the
confidentiality designation. The party
who received the material (“receiving party”) without the confidentiality
designation will return the non-designated portion (including any and all
copies in any form or format) or destroy it, as directed by the producing
party, or take such other steps as the parties agree to in writing. The producing party will promptly furnish the
receiving party with properly designated material. 4. In the event that a party inadvertently produces material
that is protected by the attorney client privilege, work product doctrine, or
any other privilege or protection from discovery or disclosure, the producing
party may make a written request, within a reasonable time after the producing
party discovers the inadvertent disclosure, that the receiving party return the
inadvertently produced privileged document(s).
The receiving party will either return the inadvertently produced
document(s) (including any and all copies in any form or format) to the
producing party or destroy that (those) document(s) immediately upon receipt of
the written request, as directed by the producing party. By returning or destroying the document, the
receiving party is not conceding that the document is privileged and is not
waiving its right to later challenge the substantive privilege claim, provided
that it may not challenge the privilege claim by arguing that the inadvertent
production waived the privilege. 5. If any party intends to use “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material at hearings in this proceeding, or in any judicial
review proceeding arising herefrom, the party so intending shall submit any
proposed exhibits or other documents setting forth or revealing such
“CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material to the Board, or the
court, as appropriate, with a written request that the Board or the court: (a) restrict attendance at the hearings
during discussion of such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material;
and (b) restrict access to the portion of the record or briefs reflecting
discussion of such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material in
accordance with the terms of this Protective Order. 6. If any party intends to use “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material in the course of any deposition in this proceeding, the
party so intending shall so advise counsel for the party producing the
materials, counsel for the deponent, and all other counsel attending the
deposition, and all portions of the deposition at which any such “CONFIDENTIAL”
and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material is used shall be restricted to persons
who may review the material under this Protective Order. All portions of deposition transcripts and/or
exhibits that consist of or disclose “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
material shall be kept under seal and treated as “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material in accordance with the terms of this Protective Order. 7. Each party is ordered to produce to the other party
contracts (including but not limited to, rail transportation contracts) or
other documents or information which, because of confidentiality provisions,
cannot be produced without a Board order directing their production to the
extent that (1) the other party has requested that the documents be produced in
discovery, and (2) the parties agree that the requested documents would be
properly discoverable in this proceeding but for the confidentiality
provision(s). Such documents shall be
required to be produced only after the other party(ies) to a contract (or other
document subject to a confidentiality provision) who are entitled to prior
notice have been provided written notice and a reasonable opportunity to object
to that production and obtain a ruling from the Board on that objection. Any documents (including, without limitation,
contracts) produced pursuant to this Section 7 shall be treated as “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” and shall otherwise be subject to the terms of this Protective
Order. To the extent that material
reflecting the terms of contracts, shipper-specific traffic data, other traffic
data, or other proprietary information is produced by a party in this or any
related proceedings and is held and used by the receiving person in compliance
with this Protective Order, such production, disclosure, and use of the
material and of the data that the material contains will be deemed essential
for the disposition of this and any related proceedings and will not be deemed
a violation of 49 U.S.C. § 11904. 8. Except for this proceeding, the parties agree that if a
party is required by law or order of a governmental or judicial body to release
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material produced by the other party or
copies or notes thereof as to which it obtained access pursuant to this Protective
Order, the party so required shall notify the producing party in writing within
3 working days of the determination that the “CONFIDENTIAL” material, “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material, or copies or notes are to be released, or within 3
working days prior to such release, whichever is soonest, to permit the
producing party the opportunity to contest the release. 9. Information that is publicly available or obtained outside
of this proceeding from a person with a right to disclose it shall not be
subject to this Protective Order even if the same information is produced and
designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” in this proceeding. 10. Each party has a right to view its own data, information and
documentation (i.e., information originally generated or compiled by or for
that party), even if that data, information and documentation has been
designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” by a producing party, without securing
prior permission from the producing party.
If a party (the “filing party”) files and serves upon the other party
(the “reviewing party”) a pleading or evidence containing the filing party’s
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material, the filing party shall also prepare and serve
contemporaneously upon the reviewing party a “CONFIDENTIAL” version of the
pleading or evidence from which the filing party’s “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
material has been redacted. The
“CONFIDENTIAL” version may be provided in hardcopy or electronic format at the
option of the filing party, and may be disclosed to those personnel employed by
the reviewing party who have read a copy of this Protective Order and executed
the attached Undertaking for Confidential Material (“In-house Personnel”). 11. Any party filing with the Board a “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” pleading in this proceeding should simultaneously file a public
version of the pleading. UNDERTAKING
CONFIDENTIAL
MATERIAL
I, _______________________________, have read the
Protective Order served on June 4, 2010, governing the production of
confidential documents in STB Docket No. NOR 42122 understand the same, and
agree to be bound by its terms. I agree
not to use or permit the use of any data or information obtained under this
Undertaking, or to use or permit the use of any techniques disclosed or
information learned as a result of receiving such data or information, for any
purposes other than the preparation and presentation of evidence and argument
in STB Docket No. NOR 42122 or any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom. I further agree not to disclose any data or
information obtained under this Protective Order to any person who has not
executed an Undertaking in the form hereof.
At the conclusion of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding
arising herefrom, I will promptly destroy any copies of such designated
documents obtained or made by me or by any outside counsel or outside
consultants working with me, provided, however, that outside counsel may retain
file copies of pleadings filed with the Board.
I understand and agree that money damages would not be a sufficient
remedy for breach of this Undertaking and that parties producing confidential
documents shall be entitled to specific performance and injunctive or other
equitable relief as a remedy for any such breach, and I further agree to waive
any requirement for the securing or posting of any bond in connection with such
remedy. Such remedy shall not be deemed
to be the exclusive remedy for breach of this Undertaking but shall be in
addition to all remedies available at law or equity. Signature:
__________________________________ Date:
___________________ UNDERTAKING
HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
As outside [counsel] [consultant] for
_______________________________, for which I am acting in this proceeding, I
have read the Protective Order served on June 4, 2010, governing the
production of confidential documents in STB Docket No. NOR 42122, understand
the same, and agree to be bound by its terms.
I further agree not to disclose any data, information or material designated
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” to any person or entity who: (i) is not eligible for
access to “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material under the terms of the Protective
Order, or (ii) has not executed a “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” undertaking in the form
hereof. I also understand and agree, as
a condition precedent to my receiving, reviewing, or using copies of any
documents designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL,” that I will limit my use of those
documents and the information they contain to this proceeding and any judicial
review proceeding arising herefrom, that I will take all necessary steps to
assure that said documents and information will be kept on a confidential basis
by any outside counsel or outside consultants working with me, that under no
circumstances will I permit access to said documents or information by
personnel of my client, its subsidiaries, affiliates, or owners, and that at
the conclusion of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding arising
herefrom, I will promptly destroy any copies of such designated documents
obtained or made by me or by any outside counsel or outside consultants working
with me, provided, however, that outside counsel may retain file copies of
pleadings filed with the Board. I
further understand that I must destroy all notes or other documents containing
such highly confidential information in compliance with the terms of the
Protective Order. Under no circumstances
will I permit access to documents designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” by, or
disclose any information contained therein to, any persons or entities for
which I am not acting in this proceeding.
I understand and agree that money damages would not be a sufficient
remedy for breach of this Undertaking and that parties producing confidential documents
shall be entitled to specific performance and injunctive or other equitable
relief as a remedy for any such breach, and I further agree to waive any
requirement for the securing or posting of any bond in connection with such
remedy. Such remedy shall not be deemed
to be the exclusive remedy for breach of this Undertaking but shall be in
addition to all remedies available at law or equity. ____________________________________ OUTSIDE
[COUNSEL][CONSULTANT] Dated:
_____________________________ [1] See, e.g., US Magnesium, L.L.C. v.
Union Pac. R.R., NOR 42116 (STB served Dec. 16, 2009); Ariz.
Elec. Power Coop., Inc. v. BNSF Ry., NOR 42113 (STB served
Feb. 3, 2009); E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. CSX Transp., Inc.,
NOR 42112 (STB served Dec. 15, 2008). | |||