| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | FD_35524_0 | ||
Case Title:   | CANEXUS CHEMICALS CANADA L.P. v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY-EMERGENCY SERVICE ORDER | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION: (1) DETERMINED THAT BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY'S ANSWER TO THE COMPLAINT FILED BY CANEXUS CHEMICALS CANADA, L.P. IS DUE ON JUNE 15, 2011; AND (2) DETERMINED THAT UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY'S PLEADING ADDRESSING CERTAIN ISSUES IN THIS PROCEEDING IS DUE ON JUNE 15, 2011. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 10 KB 18 KB 33 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 29 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
41661 SERVICE DATE – LATE RELEASE
JUNE 8, 2011 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. FD 35524 Canexus Chemicals Canada L.P. v. BNSF Railway COMPANY Decided: June 8,
2011 On
May 25, 2011, Canexus Chemicals Canada, L.P. (Canexus), filed a complaint with a request for expedited
consideration. The complaint asks the
Board to issue an order compelling BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) to establish
common carrier rates and service terms effective July 1, 2011, between North
Vancouver, B.C., and Kansas City, Mo., and between Marshall, Wash., and Kansas
City, Mo. Currently,
BNSF is hauling Canexus shipments of chlorine from North Vancouver and Marshall
to Kansas City in joint line service under temporary rates that terminate on
June 30, 2011. According to the
complaint, BNSF interchanges with Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) in Kansas
City and the shipments are hauled by UP to their final destinations in
Illinois, Texas, and Arkansas. Canexus states
that BNSF will terminate the interline service with UP through Kansas City
after the temporary rates expire.
Instead, BNSF offers to interchange with UP at Spokane, Wash. (for
movements originating from Marshall), and Portland, Or. (for movements originating
from North Vancouver). Pursuant
to 49 C.F.R. § 1111.4(c), BNSF’s answer to this complaint must be submitted
within 20 days after service of the complaint—June 15, 2011. Moreover, Canexus
has demonstrated a legitimate need for expedited consideration, as Canexus alleges its shipping needs may not be met after
June 30, 2011. Consequently, in addition
to its answer, BNSF must submit its argument as to whether BNSF has a legal
obligation to provide the specific service Canexus
has requested and to establish an appropriate rate. UP
has an interest in this matter as a carrier involved in these movements. Accordingly, the Board directs UP to submit a
pleading addressing its legal obligation, if any, to interchange with BNSF at
Spokane and Portland. UP’s submission
will also be due on June 15, 2011. Canexus,
BNSF, and UP are advised that the Board may, following the receipt of the
pleadings, convene an oral hearing to receive testimony from Canexus and the 2
railroads during the afternoon of June 23, 2011, at the Board’s headquarters. The Board will publish notice of the
tentative hearing in the Federal Register and, if the Board determines
that a hearing is necessary, it will issue a subsequent notice setting the time
no later than June 16, 2011. This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources. It is ordered: 1. BNSF’s submission is due June 15, 2011. 2. UP’s submission is due June 15, 2011. 3. This decision is effective on its service date. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. | |||