| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | EP_704_0 | ||
Case Title:   | REVIEW OF COMMODITY, BOXCAR, AND TOFC/COFC EXEMPTIONS | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED, IN PART, AMERICAN SHORT LINE AND REGIONAL RAILROAD ASSOCIATION'S REQUEST TO EXTEND THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 10 KB 21 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 30 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
41249 SERVICE
DATE – NOVEMBER 19, 2010 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. EP 704 REVIEW OF COMMODITY, BOXCAR, AND TOFC/COFC EXEMPTIONS Decided: November 19,
2010 By
notice served on October 21, 2010, and corrected by notice served on
October 25, 2010 (October notice),[1]
the Board announced its intent to hold a public hearing
on December 9, 2010, beginning at 9:30 a.m. The purpose of the public hearing is to
review certain categorical exemptions from regulation
under 49 U.S.C. § 10502, specifically the commodity exemptions
under 49 C.F.R. §§ 1039.10 and 1039.11, the boxcar exemptions
under 49 C.F.R. § 1039.14, and
trailer-on-flatcar/container-on-flatcar (TOFC/COFC) exemptions under 49 C.F.R. pt. 1090. In the October notice,
the Board sought comments as to the effectiveness of the commodity,
boxcar, and TOFC/COFC exemptions in the marketplace; whether the rationale
behind any of the exemptions should be revisited; and
whether the exemptions should be subject to periodic review. The October notice instructed interested
persons to submit a notice of intent to participate, along with written
testimony, by November 30, 2010. The October notice also required written
submissions by persons who do not wish to appear at the hearing to be submitted by November 30, 2010. On November 4, 2010, the American Short Line and Regional
Railroad Association (ASLRRA), which represents approximately 458 Class II and
Class III railroads and approximately 900 suppliers and contractors to the
short line and regional railroad industry, filed a request to extend the
procedural schedule by 120 days. ASLRRA
states that the exemptions to be reviewed are complex
and impact ASLRRA members and their customers in disparate ways. As a result, ASLRRA requests an extension of
time to gather, organize, analyze, and edit the testimony of its members. On November 15, 2010, the National Industrial
Transportation League, the American Forest & Paper Association, and the
Paper & Forest Industry Transportation Committee (collectively, interested
parties) jointly filed a reply opposing ASLRRA’s request for a 120-day
extension.[2] They indicate that the
requested extension is unnecessarily long, given the scope of testimony the
Board has requested, but state that they would not oppose a 30-day
extension. In the interest of accommodating ASLRRA’s request, while also
avoiding unnecessary delay, the Board will grant a 60-day extension of time for
the submission of comments.[3] Due to the holidays in
November and December, a 60-day, rather than 30-day, extension is
appropriate. In light of the 60-day
extension, the public hearing scheduled for December 9, 2010, will be postponed. The
hearing will now be held on February 24, 2011, at 9:30 a.m., in the 1st floor hearing room of the Board’s headquarters located
at 395 E Street, S.W., This
action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human
environment or the conservation of energy resources. It is ordered: 1. The request for an extension of the procedural
schedule, as modified, is granted. 2. The public hearing scheduled for
December 9, 2010, is rescheduled for
February 24, 2011. 3. Any party wishing to speak at the hearing
must provide a notice of intent to participate and written testimony by January
31, 2011. Written submissions of parties
who do not wish to appear at the hearing are also due by January 31, 2011. 4. This decision is effective on the date of
service. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. [1] As stated in the corrected notice, the notice
served on October 21, 2010, inadvertently omitted a phrase in
describing the comments sought by the Board for the public hearing. [2] On November 16, 2010, the Alliance of
Automobile Manufacturers submitted a filing in support of the interested
parties’ reply. [3] Because a
60-day extension would require notices of intent and written submissions to be
due by Saturday, January 29, 2011, the actual due date will be Monday, January
31, 2011. | |||