| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | EP_695_0 | ||
Case Title:   | CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION’S SALES AND DISCONTINUANCES | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION TERMINATED THIS PROCEEDING. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 9 KB 13 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 23 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
41288 SERVICE DATE – JANUARY 31, 2011 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. EP 695 Consolidated Rail Corporation’s Sales and
Discontinuances Decided: January 28, 2011 In a decision served May 17, 2010, in this proceeding, the
Board ordered Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) to submit a full
explanation by July 1, 2010, of (1) how and under what authority it came
purportedly to transfer title to parts of a 2.27 mile line of railroad in
Hudson County, N.J., known as the “Lehigh Valley Main Line” (the Line), to New
Jersey Transit Corporation, and (2) when and under what authority and
circumstances it purported to discontinue service on the Line. The Board also
ordered Conrail to disclose all of its line or partial line sales and
all of its discontinuances of service since January 1, 1996, for which no Board
authority was sought and no exemption notice was filed, along
with an explanation of why Board authority was not sought and no
exemption notice was filed. The
decision resulted from the Board’s concerns about Conrail seeking abandonment
authority over the Line in November 2008 without disclosing that it had sold
portions of the Line in 1996 without Board authorization.[1] On July 1, 2010, Conrail filed a detailed
explanation concerning the transfer of, and discontinuance of service on, the Line
in accordance with the decision. On
September 27, 2010, Conrail filed a report explaining that it had fully searched
its records and found no other line or partial line sales or discontinuances
since January 1, 1996, for which Board authority was required and was not
sought and obtained. Conrail
has provided information responsive to the Board’s concerns and has not
identified deficiencies similar to the Lehigh Valley Main Line. Accordingly, this proceeding will be terminated. This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources. It is ordered:
By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. [1] In a decision served
concurrently, the Board granted abandonment authority over the Line and
exempted the Line from the Board’s offer of financial assistance provisions at
49 U.S.C. § 10904. Consol. Rail Corp.—Aban.
Exemption—in Hudson Cnty., N.J., AB 167 (Sub-No.
1190X) (STB served May 17, 2010). | |||