|SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT|
|ELGIN, JOLIET & EASTERN RAILWAY COMPANY--ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION--IN LAKE COUNTY, IND.|
|Director Of Proceedings|
|DECISION GRANTED INDIANA TRAILS FUND, INC.'S REQUEST TO EXTEND THE NOTICE OF INTERIM TRAIL USE OR ABANDONMENT NEGOTIATING PERIOD UNTIL DECEMBER 28, 2011|
| 11 KB|
|Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 19 Seconds|
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com.
|Full Text of Decision|
41755 SERVICE DATE – JULY 19, 2011
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
Docket No. AB 117 (Sub-No. 7X)
IN LAKE COUNTY, IND.
Decided: July 18, 2011
In this decision, an extension is granted for negotiating a trail use/rail banking agreement. Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Company (EJ&E) filed a notice of exemption under 49 C.F.R. pt. 1152 subpart F—UExempt AbandonmentsU to abandon its line of railroad between milepost 46.10 and milepost 48.28, a distance of 2.18 miles, in Hammond, Lake County, Ind. Notice of the exemption was served and published in the UFederalU URegisterU on June 8, 2010 (75 Fed. Reg. 32,535-36). The exemption became effective on July 8, 2010.
By decision and notice of interim trail use or abandonment (NITU) served on July 7, 2010 (July 7 decision), the proceeding was reopened and the exemption was made subject to interim trail use/rail banking and public use. A 180-day period was authorized to permit public use negotiations and to permit both the Indiana Trails Fund, Inc. (ITFI), and the Northwest Indiana Railroad Preservation Society (NIRPS) to negotiate an interim trail use/rail banking agreement with EJ&E for the described line, pursuant to the National Trail System Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1247(d). The trail use negotiating period was set to expire on January 3, 2011. By decision served on January 20, 2011, the NITU negotiation period was extended until July 3, 2011.
By letter filed on July 6, 2011, ITFI requests an extension of the negotiating period of 180 days, to December 28, 2011. ITFI seeks the additional time to continue the negotiations toward interim trail use. In a response filed on July 7, 2011, EJ&E states that it agrees with the proposed extension request as set forth in ITFI’s letter.
here, the carrier has not consummated the abandonment at the end of the
previously imposed NITU negotiating period and has agreed to continue
negotiations, the Board retains jurisdiction and the NITU negotiating period
may be extended. Under the circumstances, extension of the
negotiating period is warranted. See
Birt v. STB, 90 F.3d 580, 588-90 (D.C. Cir. 1996); Grantwood
This decision will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources.
It is ordered:
1. ITFI’s request to extend the NITU negotiating period is granted.
2. The negotiating period for ITFI under the NITU is extended until December 28, 2011.
3. This decision is effective on its service date.
Board, Rachel D.
 The new NITU deadline sought by ITFI, December 28, 2011, is only 178 days from the previous deadline of July 3, 2011.
 NIRPS, the other potential trail sponsor for whom the NITU was established, has not sought an extension of its negotiating period under the NITU.