|
BACKGROUND
On October 3, 2011, Union
Pacific Railroad Company (UP) and Iowa Interstate Railroad, Ltd. (IAIS) jointly
filed a petition under 49 U.S.C § 10502 seeking exemption from the provisions
of 49 U.S.C. § 10903 to permit UP to abandon and IAIS to discontinue service
over UP’s railroad line known as the Chicago and Great Western Industrial
Lead, between milepost 503.6 and milepost 504.05, a distance of approximately
0.45 miles, in Council Bluffs, Pottawattamie County, IA (Line). The petition also seeks approval from the
Surface Transportation Board (Board) for the following actions involving
trackage rights: 1) UP to abandon and
IAIS to discontinue service over UP’s connecting track from UP milepost
503.85 on the UP line to the end point at IAIS milepost 486.8, a distance of
400 feet (UP connecting track); 2) IAIS to discontinue its trackage rights
over the Line and UP connecting track (IAIS trackage rights); and 3) UP to
discontinue its overhead trackage rights over that portion of IAIS’s mainline
from IAIS milepost 486.8 to IAIS milepost 488.0, a distance of 1.2 miles (UP overhead
trackage rights). A map depicting the
Line in relationship to the area served is attached to this Environmental
Assessment (EA).
OEA notes that in 2008, UP
and IAIS previously petitioned the Board seeking approval to abandon and
discontinue service over this very same Line and UP Connector. The Board in a decision dated December 12,
2008 denied the joint petition, explaining that UP and IAIS had not
adequately demonstrated the economic justification for the proposed
abandonment and discontinuance. Instead, UP and IAIS based their arguments in favor of abandonment
and discontinuance on the fact that Red Giant Oil Company (Red Giant) and
Midwest Walnut Company of Iowa (Midwest Walnut) could continue to receive
service from IAIS over the Red Giant property, despite acknowledging that
IAIS would have no common carrier obligation to provide such service (which
means that service could end at any time without Board authorization and
shippers would lose their regulatory remedies for service failures or
inadequacies). In addition, UP and
IAIS did not provide any details of an agreement or even discussions with the
shippers regarding their proposed future service arrangements. Furthermore, UP and IAIS did not provide
statements from Midwest or Red Giant to reflect their support for the
abandonment and discontinuance.
According to UP, during
the past 4 years, IAIS has been the sole provider of rail service for the
only 2 shippers on the Line, Red Giant and Midwest Walnut. Red Giant produces a wide array of
petroleum products, while Midwest Walnut produces walnut veneer and other fine
hardwood lumber products.
UP states that during the
base year—2010—Midwest Walnut received 6 carloads of lumber and UP
anticipates similar carload activity from Midwest Walnut in the future. Red Giant has moved both inbound and
outbound carloads of petroleum products.
UP has submitted carload traffic from Red Giant, but asks that the
data be kept confidential. The Red
Giant carload data is well below the Board’s thresholds for analysis at 49
C.F.R. 1105.7(e)(5). Moreover, should
the Board approve the proposed abandonment and discountenance, none of Red
Giant’s rail traffic would be diverted to truck because it would continue to
move over the same rail (albeit a private line owned by Red Giant rather than
a UP rail line).
As noted above, if the Board
should approve the abandonment and discontinuance, UP would sell the Line and
UP Connector Track to Red Giant. Once
the sale is complete, the Line as well as the UP Connector Track would become
part of Red Giant’s industrial facility and would be renamed the Red
Giant/Midwest Walnut Industry Track and would be subject to permanent
easement access for Midwest Walnut. IAIS
would provide direct rail common carrier service to both shippers pursuant to
its Industrial Track Agreements. UP
states that approval of the proposed action and subsequent sale would provide
Red Giant and Midwest Walnut control over their respective industrial
facilities. Furthermore, because IAIS
would continue to provide common carrier service over the Line and UP
Connector, rail service would continue to be available to any potential
customers in the area of the IAIS line.
Removal of UP’s and IAIS’
common carrier interests associated with both the Line and the UP Connector
Track would enable Red Giant to 1) finalize acquisition of the real property
which constitutes the Line and the UP Connector Track thereby creating the Red
Giant/Midwest Walnut Industry Track and 2) to modify and expand its
operations as necessary subject to the permanent easement access for Midwest
Walnut.
DESCRIPTION OF THE RAIL LINE
The topography surrounding
the Line and UP Connector Track is generally level and passes through areas
that are urban and industrial in nature.
The width of the right-of-way of both the Line and UP Connector Track
is 50 feet. Neither the Line nor the
UP Connector Track contains any structures that are 50 years old or older. If the Board should approve this
abandonment, UP would not engage in any salvage activities.
As stated above, the Line and the UP Connector Track are located on
property that is under a purchase contract from UP to Red Giant and does not
contain any federally granted rights-of-way or reversionary property. Furthermore, there is no passenger rail
service is moving over the Line. The
Line and UP Connector Track traverse United States Postal Service Zip Code 51503
while the IAIS mainline traverses United States Postal Service Zip Codes 51503
and 51501.
UP notes that no other
customers have received rail service over the Line during this time period
and that overhead rail service is impossible because portions of the Great
Western Industrial Lead were previously abandoned-- to the south in 1971 and
to the north in 2000.
UP also states that the Line
is not suitable for other public purposes including roads or highways, mass
transportation, energy production or transmission, or recreational use. This is because, as discussed above, both the
Line and the UP Connector Track are contractually obligated to be transferred
to Red Giant.
In addition, the Line and
the UP Connector Track are located in the City of Council Bluffs, IA, which
is served by numerous local streets, interstate highways, other UP and IAIS
lines, as well at lines of other railroads, including BNSF Railway Company
and Canadian National Railway Company.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
UP submitted an
Environmental Report jointly with IAIS that concludes that the quality of the
human environment will not be affected significantly as a result of the
abandonment or any post-abandonment activities, including salvage and
disposition of the right-of-way. UP
served the Environmental Report on a number of appropriate federal, state,
and local agencies as required by the Board’s environmental rules (49 C.F.R.
§ 1105.7(b)).
The Board’s Office of
Environmental Analysis (OEA) has reviewed and investigated the record in this
proceeding.
Diversion
of Traffic
As noted above, should
the Board approve the abandonment and discontinuance, IAIS would continue to serve
both Red Giant and Midwest Walnut and therefore no diversion of traffic to
trucks or any other mode would occur. IAIS’s
mainline would connect to the Line via the UP Connector Track which would be
controlled and owned by the shippers and is specifically included as part of
the Red Giant/Midwest Walnut Industry Track.
In a letters dated July 13,
2011, from Midwest Walnut and August 23, 2011, from Red Giant, both parties
state that they support the proposed abandonment and discontinuance and
understand that each of their respective facilities would continue to receive
rail service from IAIS. Moreover, IAIS
would continue to have its direct physical connection to each facility which
would be governed by its Industrial Track Agreements.
UP states that it believes
that there would be no adverse effect on regional or local transportation
systems or modes because IAIS would continue to serve Red Giant and Midwest
Walnut. Furthermore, there would be no
effect on the movement and/or recovery of energy resources, recyclable
commodities or change in overall energy efficiency.
The Natural Resources
Conservation Service states that it has no concern or comments regarding the
proposed abandonment and discontinuance.
The U.S. Environmental
Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), Region 7, has not yet responded to this
proposed abandonment and discontinuance.
However, the U.S. EPA did submit comments on the previous petition filed
in 2008. In 2008, the U.S. EPA noted
that its evaluation found no regulatory or remedial activity to be within the
proposed abandonment’s right-of-way.
However, the U.S. EPA noted that the environmental legacies of railway
operations can include, but not limited to, product spills, maintenance
activities, wood preservative applications, etc. UP states that there are no
known hazardous materials waste sites or sites where known hazardous material
spills have occurred on or along the right-of-way. OEA will not recommend a condition here, given
that no hazardous material waste sites are involved in this proceeding.
The U.S. Department of
Commerce, National Geodetic Survey (NGS) also noted in comments it filed on
the 2008 petition that there are no geodetic station markers located in the
area of the proposed abandonment. Because
the NGS has not responded to this current petition, OEA will add the NGS to
the service list for this EA and specifically invite NGS’s comments on this
EA.
Based
on all information available to date, OEA does not believe that salvage activities
would cause significant environmental impacts.
HISTORIC REVIEW
In its Historic
Report, UP states that the right-of-way of both the Line and the UP Connector
Track is 50 feet wide and does not include any structures that are 50
years old or older. Because the Line
and UP Connector Track would be sold to Red Giant for creation of the Red
Giant/Midwest Walnut Industrial Track, no salvage activities would take
place.
According
to UP, the Line was originally constructed in 1901 by the Mason City and Fort
Dodge Railroad (MCFD). Construction of
the line from Fort Dodge to Council Bluffs, a distance of 132.91 miles, began
in August 1901with rail service beginning January 1, 1904.
The MCFD was a subsidiary of
the Chicago Great Western Railway Company.
The purpose of the MCFD was to construct, acquire, and operate a
railroad from a connection with the Chicago Great Western Railway Company’s
tracks at Hayfield, MN, southwest through the cities of Mason City and Fort
Dodge, IA to Omaha, NE, and Sioux City, IA, with a branch line extending
westerly from Olewein, IA to Clarion, IA.
The MCFD owned and operated approximately 374 miles of rail line. The Chicago Great Western Railway Company was
acquired by the Chicago Great Western Railroad Company on August 11, 1909.
The UP Connector Track was
constructed in 2000. The Line and the
UP Connector Track are located on property under a purchase contract from UP
to Red Giant and does not contain any federally granted rights-of-way or
reversionary property.
UP served the
Historic Report as required by the
Board’s environmental rules (49 C.F.R. § 1105.8(a)) on the State
Historical Society of Iowa (SHPO) pursuant to 49 C.F.R. § 1105.8(c). In a letter regarding the 2008
petition, the SHPO states that an opinion would be offered
by August 13, 2008, only if it determines, among other considerations, that
there is an adverse effect. To date,
the SHPO has not filed a response
stating that historic properties listed in or eligible for inclusion in the
National Register of Historic Places (National Register) would be affected
within the right-of-way (the Area of Potential Effect, or APE) of the
proposed abandonment.
The SHPO has not yet
responded to the current petition. OEA
spoke to the SHPO on November 22, 2011, and learned that the SHPO is awaiting
on additional information to be submitted by UP before making its final
determination. Accordingly, we are
recommending a condition requiring the UP and IAIS to retain their respective
interests in and take no steps to alter the historic integrity of all
historic properties including sites, buildings, structures and objects within
the project right-of-way (the Area of Potential Effect) eligible for listing
or listed in the National Register of Historic Places until completion of the
Section 106 process. Guidance
regarding the Board’s historic preservation review process is available on
the Board’s website at http://www.stb.dot.gov/stb/environment/preservation.html.
Pursuant to 36 C.F.R. §
800.2, OEA conducted a search of the Native American Consultation Database to
identify federally-recognized tribes that may have ancestral connections to
the project area. The database indicated that the following 7
federally-recognized tribes,
may have knowledge regarding properties of traditional religious and cultural
significance within the right-of-way (the APE) of the proposed abandonment:
1. Iowa Tripe of Kansas and
Nebraska
2. Iowa
Tribe of Oklahoma
3. Omaha
Tribe of Nebraska
4. Otoe-Missouria
Tribe of Indians, Oklahoma
5. Sac
& Fox Nation of Missouri in Kansas and Nebraska
6. Sac
& Fox Nation, Oklahoma
7. Sac
& Fox Tribe of the Mississippi in Iowa
Accordingly, OEA is sending a copy of this
EA to the above mentioned 7 tribes for review and comment.
|