| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | NOR_42132_0 | ||
Case Title:   | CANEXUS CHEMICALS CANADA, L.P. V. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS PROCEEDING. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 54 KB 32 KB 86 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 82 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
42116 SERVICE DATE –
DECEMBER 29, 2011 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. NOR 42132 CANEXUS CHEMICALS CANADA, L.P. v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Decided: December
28, 2011 This
decision grants a motion for a protective order for this proceeding. By a complaint
filed on November 14, 2011, Canexus Chemicals Canada, L.P. (Canexus) challenges
the reasonableness of rates charged by BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) for the transportation
of chlorine from: (1) North Vancouver,
B.C. to Glendale, Ariz.; and (2) North Vancouver to Albuquerque, N.M. Canexus seeks relief pursuant to the
simplified procedures set forth in Simplified Standards for Rail Rate Cases,
EP 646 (Sub-No.1) (STB served Sept. 5, 2007).
Canexus has elected to utilize the Three-Benchmark method, under which
the total available rate relief is limited to $1 million over a 5-year
period. BNSF filed an answer to the
complaint on December 5, 2011.[1] On
December 15, 2011, the parties jointly filed a motion for a protective
order. The proposed protective order, as
modified in the appendix to this decision, is generally consistent with the
protective orders entered by the Board in recent rate proceedings.[2] It includes provisions governing the
production of highly confidential material and stipulates that the protected
exchange of material will not be deemed a violation of 49 U.S.C. § 11904. Also, in order to avoid the need for routine,
unopposed motions to compel the disclosure of confidential contracts related to
the dispute, the protective order specifically provides for the production of
such contracts to enable a more efficient discovery process. The parties also note that, in conformity
with a recent Memorandum and Order issued by the Federal Railroad Administration
on July 29, 2011, the proposed protective order includes additional
conditions and requirements for the production and protection from unauthorized
disclosure of rail traffic information constituting or containing Sensitive
Security Information. Good cause
exists to grant the motion. The
unrestricted disclosure of confidential, proprietary, or commercially sensitive
material could cause serious competitive injury. Issuance of the requested protective order
will ensure that the material, produced in response to a discovery request or
otherwise, will be used only in connection with this proceeding and not for any
other business or commercial purpose.
The motion conforms with 49 C.F.R. § 1104.14
governing requests for protective orders to maintain confidentiality of
materials submitted to the Board, and 49 C.F.R. § 1114.21(c)
governing protective orders regarding discovery. Accordingly, the request for a protective
order will be granted. This
action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human
environment or the conservation of energy resources. It
is ordered: 1. The joint motion for a protective order by
the parties is granted. 2. The parties are directed to comply with the
protective order set forth in the appendix to this decision. 3. This decision is effective on its service
date. By
the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. APPENDIX PROTECTIVE ORDER 1.
Any party producing information, data, documents, or other
material (hereinafter collectively referred to as “material”) in discovery to
another party to this proceeding, or submitting material in pleadings, that the
party in good faith believes reflects proprietary or confidential information,
may designate and stamp such material as “CONFIDENTIAL,” and such material must
be treated as confidential. Such
material, any copies, and any data or notes derived therefrom: (a) Shall be used
solely for the purpose of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding
arising herefrom, and not for any other business, commercial, or competitive
purpose. (b) May be disclosed
only to employees, counsel, or agents of the party requesting such material who
have a need to know, handle, or review the material for purposes of this
proceeding and any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom, and only where
such employee, counsel, or agent has been given and has read a copy of this
Protective Order, agrees to be bound by its terms, and executes the attached
Undertaking for Confidential Material prior to receiving access to such
materials. (c) Must be destroyed
by the requesting party, its employees, counsel, and agents, at the completion
of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom. However, counsel and consultants for a party
are permitted to retain file copies of all pleadings which they are authorized
to review under this Protective Order, including Paragraph 11. (d) If contained in any
pleading filed with the Board, shall, in order to be kept confidential, be
filed only in pleadings submitted in a package clearly marked on the outside
“Confidential Materials Subject to Protective Order.” See 49 C.F.R. § 1104.14. 2.
Any party producing material in discovery to another party to this
proceeding, or submitting material in pleadings, may
in good faith designate and stamp particular material, such as material
containing shipper-specific rate or cost data, or other competitively sensitive
information, as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.” If
any party wishes to challenge such designation, the party may bring such matter
to the attention of the Board. Material
that is so designated may be disclosed only to outside counsel or outside
consultants of the party requesting such materials who have a need to know,
handle, or review the materials for purposes of this proceeding and any
judicial review proceeding arising herefrom, provided that such outside counsel
or outside consultants have been given and have read a copy of this Protective
Order, agree to be bound by its terms, and execute the attached Undertaking for
Highly Confidential Material prior to receiving access to such materials. Material designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
and produced in discovery under this provision shall be subject to all of the
other provisions of this Protective Order, including without limitation Paragraph
1. 3.
Any party producing in discovery
railroad traffic data that has been designated Sensitive Security Information (“SSI”)
by the United States Department of Transportation (“DOT”) or the United States
Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) shall produce such material in
accordance with governing DOT and DHS regulations, rules and policies,
including but not necessarily limited to 49 C.F.R. pts. 15 and 1520,
and the terms and conditions set forth in the Federal Railroad Administration (“FRA”)
memorandum entitled “Authorization to Share Sensitive Security Information
(SSI) With Complainants and Other Parties Involved in Surface Transportation
Board (STB) Administrative Proceedings” (July 29, 2011) (“July 29
Memorandum”) and SSI Order 2011-06-FRA-01 (July 29, 2011).[‡] In addition
to other applicable conditions and requirements, rail traffic SSI shall be
produced only to those outside counsel or consultants to a party who, prior to
production, have (i) reviewed and executed an Undertaking for Highly
Confidential Material; and
(ii) reviewed and executed an Undertaking for SSI Material. Executed copies of Undertakings for Highly
Confidential Material and Undertakings for SSI Material must be provided to the
producing party before that SSI material may be produced to representatives of
the requesting party. 4.
In the event that a party produces material which should have been
designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” and inadvertently fails
to designate the material as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL,” the
producing party may notify the other party in writing within 5 days of
discovery of its inadvertent failure to make the confidentiality
designation. The party who received the
material without the confidentiality designation will return the non-designated
portion (including any and all copies) or destroy it, as directed by the
producing party, or take such other steps as the parties agree to in
writing. The producing party will
promptly furnish the receiving party with properly designated material. 5.
In the event that a party inadvertently produces material that is
protected by the attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, or any other
privilege, the producing party may make a written request within a reasonable
time after the producing party discovers the inadvertent disclosure that the
other party return the inadvertently produced
privileged document. The party who
received the inadvertently produced document will either return the document to
the producing party or destroy the document immediately upon receipt of the
written request, as directed by the producing party. By returning or destroying the document, the
receiving party is not conceding that the document is privileged and is not
waiving its right to later challenge the substantive privilege claim, provided
that it may not challenge the privilege claim by arguing that the inadvertent
production waived the privilege. 6.
If any party intends to use “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material at hearings in this proceeding, or in any judicial
review proceeding arising herefrom, the party so intending shall submit any
proposed exhibits or other documents setting forth or revealing such
“CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material to the Board, or the
court, as appropriate, with a written request that the Board or the court: (a) restrict attendance at the hearings
during discussion of such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material,
and (b) restrict access to the portion of the record or briefs reflecting
discussion of such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material in
accordance with the terms of this Protective Order. 7.
If any party intends to use “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material in the course of any deposition in this proceeding, the
party so intending shall so advise counsel for the party producing the materials,
counsel for the deponent, and all other counsel attending the deposition, and
all portions of the deposition at which any such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material is used shall be restricted to persons who may review
the material under this Protective Order.
All portions of deposition transcripts and/or exhibits that consist of
or disclose “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material shall be kept
under seal and treated as “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material
in accordance with the terms of this Protective Order. 8.
Each party is ordered to produce to the other party rail
transportation contracts or other documents or information which, because of
confidentiality provisions, cannot be produced without a Board order directing
their production to the extent that (1) the other party has requested that
the documents be produced in discovery, and (2) the parties agree that the
requested documents would be properly discoverable in this proceeding but for
the confidentiality provision(s). Such
documents shall be required to be produced only after the other party(ies) to a
contract (or other document subject to a confidentiality provision) who are
entitled to prior notice have been provided written notice and a reasonable
opportunity to object to that production and obtain a ruling from the Board on
that objection. Any documents or
contracts produced pursuant to this Paragraph 8 shall be treated as “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” and shall otherwise be subject to the terms of this Protective
Order. To the extent that material
reflecting the terms of contracts, shipper-specific traffic data, other traffic
data, or other proprietary information is produced by a party in this or any
related proceedings and is held and used by the receiving person in compliance
with this Protective Order, such production, disclosure, and use of the
material and of the data that the material contains will be deemed essential
for the disposition of this and any related proceedings and will not be deemed
a violation of 49 U.S.C. § 11904. 9.
Except for this proceeding, the parties agree that if a party is
required by law or order of a governmental or judicial body to release
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material produced by the other party or
copies or notes thereof as to which it obtained access pursuant to this
Protective Order, the party so required shall notify the producing party in
writing within 3 working days of the determination that the “CONFIDENTIAL”
material, “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material, or copies or notes are to be
released, or within 3 working days prior to such release, whichever is soonest,
to permit the producing party the opportunity to contest the release. 10. Information
that is publicly available or obtained outside of this proceeding from a person
with a right to disclose it publicly shall not be subject to this Protective
Order even if the same information is produced and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL”
or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” in this proceeding. 11. Each
party has a right to view its own data, information, and documentation (i.e.,
information originally generated or compiled by or for that party), even if
that data, information, and documentation has been designated as “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” by a producing party, without securing prior permission from the
producing party. If a party (the “filing
party”) files and serves upon the other party (the “reviewing party”) a pleading
or evidence containing “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material of the filing party, the
filing party shall also contemporaneously provide to outside counsel for the reviewing
party a list of the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” information of the filing party contained
in the pleading that must be redacted from the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” version
prior to review by the in-house personnel of the reviewing party. 12. Any
party filing with the Board a “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” pleading
in this proceeding should simultaneously file a public version of the pleading. UNDERTAKING CONFIDENTIAL
MATERIAL I,
_______________________________, have read the Protective Order served on December
29, 2011 governing the production of confidential documents in STB Docket No.
NOR 42132, understand the same, and agree to be bound by its terms. I agree not to use or permit the use of any
data or information obtained under this Undertaking, or to use or permit the
use of any techniques disclosed or information learned as a result of receiving
such data or information, for any purposes other than the preparation and presentation
of evidence and argument in STB Docket No. NOR 42132 or any
judicial review proceeding arising herefrom. I further agree not to disclose any data or
information obtained under this Protective Order to any person who has not
executed an Undertaking in the form hereof.
At the conclusion of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding
arising herefrom, I will promptly destroy any copies of such designated
documents obtained or made by me or by any outside counsel or outside
consultants working with me, provided, however, that counsel and consultants
may retain copies of pleadings which they were authorized to review under the
Protective Order. I understand and
agree that money damages would not be a sufficient remedy for breach of this
Undertaking and that parties producing confidential documents shall be entitled
to specific performance and injunctive or other equitable relief as a remedy
for any such breach, and I further agree to waive any requirement for the
securing or posting of any bond in connection with such remedy. Such remedy shall not be deemed to be the
exclusive remedy for breach of this Undertaking but shall be in addition to all
remedies available at law or equity. ___________________________________ Dated:______________________________ UNDERTAKING HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL As outside [
counsel ] [ consultant ] for _______________________________, for which I am
acting in this proceeding, I, _______________________________, have read the
Protective Order served on December 29, 2011 governing the production of
confidential documents in STB Docket No. NOR 42132, understand the same, and
agree to be bound by its terms. I
further agree not to disclose any data, information or material designated
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” to any person or entity who: (i) is not eligible for
access to “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material under the terms of the Protective Order,
or (ii) has not executed an Undertaking for Highly Confidential Material
in the form hereof. I also understand
and agree, as a condition precedent to my receiving, reviewing, or using copies
of any documents designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” that I will limit my use of
those documents and the information they contain to this proceeding and any
judicial review proceeding arising herefrom; that I will take all necessary
steps to assure that said documents and information will be kept on a
confidential basis by any outside counsel or outside consultants working with
me; that under no circumstances will I permit access to said documents or
information by personnel of my client, its subsidiaries, affiliates, or owners;
and that at the conclusion of this proceeding and any judicial review
proceeding arising herefrom I will promptly destroy any copies of such
designated documents obtained or made by me or by any outside counsel or
outside consultants working with me, provided, however, that outside counsel
and consultants may retain file copies of pleadings filed with the Board. I further understand that I must destroy all
notes or other documents containing “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” information in
compliance with the terms of the Protective Order. Under no circumstances will I permit access
to documents designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” by, or disclose any information
contained therein to, any persons or entities for which I am not acting in this
proceeding. I understand and
agree that money damages would not be a sufficient remedy for breach of this
Undertaking and that parties producing confidential documents shall be entitled
to specific performance and injunctive or other equitable relief as a remedy
for any such breach, and I further agree to waive any requirement for the
securing or posting of any bond in connection with such remedy. Such remedy shall not be deemed to be the
exclusive remedy for breach of this Undertaking but shall be in addition to all
remedies available at law or equity. ______________________________________ OUTSIDE
[COUNSEL] [CONSULTANT] TO _________________________ [Party
name] Dated: _______________________________ UNDERTAKING HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL SECURITY SENSITIVE INFORMATION AND MATERIAL I, _______________________________, have
read the Federal Railroad Administration’s (“FRA”) Order 2011-06-FRA-01
designating certain railroad traffic information as Sensitive Security
Information (“SSI”) and the July 29, 2011 FRA memorandum entitled
“Authorization to Share Sensitive Security Information (SSI) With Complainants
and Other Parties Involved in Surface Transportation Board (STB) Administrative
Proceedings” (“July 29 Memorandum”). I
agree to be bound by the terms of Order 2011-06-FRA-01 and the July 29
Memorandum for rail traffic SSI data or information produced in discovery or
submitted as evidence (including evidence or materials derived or compiled from
SSI produced in this proceeding) in STB Docket No. NOR 42132. I have also executed an Undertaking for
Highly Confidential Material, and acknowledge that all SSI produced in this proceeding
is also designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” and
is subject to all of the requirements and limitations that apply to “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material, as well as the additional requirements set forth in
this undertaking. I have been advised and hereby acknowledge
that BNSF Railway Company’s conditional disclosure of SSI data or information
in STB Docket No. NOR 42132 pursuant to Order 2011-06-FRA-01 and the July 29
Memorandum makes me a “covered person” within the meaning of 49 C.F.R.
§§ 15.7(m) and 1520.7 as to any such SSI information I receive, access,
review, and/or use. I understand my
duties and responsibilities as a “covered person” under federal law and
applicable regulations (including but not limited to 49 C.F.R. pts. 15
and 1520), and will comply with those responsibilities. I understand that unauthorized disclosure of
SSI may result in civil penalty or other action. Pursuant to 49 C.F.R. §§ 15.19 and
1520.19, I agree to destroy all SSI data or information in my possession,
custody, or control after the conclusion of STB Docket No. NOR
42132, including the final disposition of any appeals of the Board’s final
decision in that docket. ______________________________________ OUTSIDE
[COUNSEL] [CONSULTANT] TO _________________________ [Party
name] Dated: _______________________________ [1] On December 14, 2011, BNSF filed a Motion to Permit Consideration of 2011 TIH Movements from BNSF Traffic Data in Selecting Comparison Group, and requested expedited consideration of its motion on December 16, 2011. Canexus filed its opposition to BNSF’s request for expedited consideration on December 19, 2011. These filings will be addressed in a separate decision. [2] See, e.g., Sunbelt Chlor Alkali P’ship v. Norfolk S. Ry., NOR 42130 (STB served Sept. 6, 2011); E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Norfolk S. Ry., NOR 42125 (STB served Jan. 11, 2011); M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. CSX Transp., Inc., NOR 42123 (STB served Aug. 4, 2010). [‡] A party producing rail traffic information containing or constituting SSI in discovery or submitting such material in pleadings should also comply with other applicable requirements of DOT and DHS SSI regulations governing the use and handling of SSI, including the SSI marking requirements set forth in 49 C.F.R. § 15.13 or, if that is not practicable, the alternative marking requirements set forth in the July 29 Memorandum. | |||