SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT
    Decision Information

Docket Number:  
NOR_42128_0

Case Title:  
SOUTH MISSISSIPPI ELECTRIC POWER ASSOCIATION V. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Decision Type:  
Decision

Deciding Body:  
Director Of Proceedings

    Decision Summary

Decision Notes:  
DECISION GRANTED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, SOUTH MISSISSIPPI ELECTRIC POWER ASSOCIATION'S MOTION TO WITHDRAW IT MOTION TO COMPEL FILED IN THIS PROCEEDING.

    Decision Attachments

8 KB
20 KB

Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 14 Seconds

Note:
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com.

    Full Text of Decision

36371

41810                     SERVICE DATE – LATE RELEASE AUGUST 11, 2011

DO

 

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

 

DECISION

 

Docket No. NOR 42128

 

South mississippi electric power association

v.

NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

 

Decided:  August 11, 2011

 

            This decision grants the motion of South Mississippi Electric Power Association (SMEPA) to withdraw its previously filed motion to compel discovery from Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSR).

 

            On December 28, 2010, SMEPA filed a complaint against defendant NSR challenging the reasonableness of rates for the transportation of coal to SMEPA’s R.D. Morrow, Sr. Generating Station, near Richburg, Miss., from NSR-served mine origins and origin groups in five states, and from NSR-served docks in Mobile, Ala.  On July 22, 2011, SMEPA filed its First Motion to Compel Discovery (motion to compel) from NSR.  NSR filed its reply in opposition to SMEPA’s motion to compel on August 1, 2011.

 

            Subsequently, on August 3, 2011, SMEPA filed a motion to withdraw its motion to compel, stating that NSR’s “objection now has been resolved” and that NSR “has produced data and documents that were the subject of SMEPA’s Motion to Compel.”[1]  In its motion to withdraw, SMEPA also stated that it “has been authorized to represent that [NSR] concurs in the relief requested herein.”

 

            SMEPA’s motion to withdraw its motion to compel will be granted without prejudice.

 

            This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources.

 

It is ordered:

 

1.  SMEPA’s motion to withdraw its motion to compel is granted without prejudice.

 

2.  This decision is effective on its service date.

 

By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings.

 

 

 

 



[1]  Also on August 3, 2011, SMEPA filed a petition to modify the procedural schedule.  NSR filed a reply on August 8, 2011.  That petition will be addressed by a separate decision.