|SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT|
|BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY--TEMPORARY TRACKAGE RIGHTS EXEMPTION--UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY|
|DECISION REVOKED THE CLASS EXEMPTION AS IT PERTAINS TO THE TRACKAGE RIGHTS DESCRIBED IN DOCKET NO. FD 35676 TO PERMIT THE TRACKAGE RIGHTS TO EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 31, 2012, SUBJECT TO EMPLOYEE PROTECTIVE CONDITIONS.|
| 12 KB|
|Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 17 Seconds|
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com.
|Full Text of Decision|
42696 SERVICE DATE – LATE RELEASE NOVEMBER 30, 2012
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
Docket No. FD 35676 (Sub-No. 1)
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY—TEMPORARY TRACKAGE RIGHTS EXEMPTION—
UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY
Digest: This decision authorizes the expiration of certain Board approved rights by one carrier to operate over the lines of another carrier, even though such rights typically continue indefinitely.
Decided: November 26, 2012
By petition filed on September 18, 2012, BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) requests that the Board partially revoke the trackage rights class exemption, 49 C.F.R. § 1180.2(d)(7), as it pertains to the trackage rights arrangement exempted in Docket No. FD 35676, to permit those trackage rights to expire at midnight on December 31, 2012.
BNSF states that the trackage rights arrangement exempted in Docket No. FD 35676 is intended to permit BNSF to move empty and loaded ballast trains to and from the ballast pit at Elsey, which is adjacent to the UP rail line, for use in BNSF’s maintenance-of-way (MOW) projects. The parties’ agreement provides that the trackage rights are temporary and are to expire at midnight on December 31, 2012.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Although BNSF and UP have expressly agreed on the duration of the proposed temporary trackage rights arrangement, trackage rights approved under the class exemption at 49 C.F.R. § 1180.2(d)(7) typically remain effective indefinitely, regardless of any contract provisions. Occasionally, trackage rights exemptions have been granted for a limited time period rather than in perpetuity. See, e.g., Union Pac. R.R.–Trackage Rights Exemption–The Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry., FD 34242 (Sub-No. 1) (STB served Oct. 7, 2002).
Under 49 U.S.C. § 10502, the Board may exempt a person, class of persons, or a transaction or service, in whole or in part, when it finds that: (1) continued regulation is not necessary to carry out the rail transportation policy of 49 U.S.C. § 10101; and (2) either the transaction or service is of limited scope, or regulation is not necessary to protect shippers from the abuse of market power.
BNSF’s temporary trackage rights were already authorized under the class exemption at 49 C.F.R. § 1180.2(d)(7). See R.R. Consolidation Procedures—Trackage Rights Exemption, 1 I.C.C.2d 270 (1985). Granting partial revocation in these circumstances will promote the rail transportation policy by eliminating the need to file a second pleading seeking discontinuance when the agreement expires, thereby promoting rail transportation policy goals at 49 U.S.C. § 10101(2), (4), (5), (7), and (15). Moreover, limiting the term of the trackage rights is consistent with the limited scope of the transaction previously exempted and will have no adverse impact on shippers on the line because the trackage rights that are the subject of the exemption are solely for the movement of empty and loaded ballast trains for use in BNSF’s MOW projects. Therefore, we will grant the petition and permit the trackage rights exempted in Docket No. FD 35676 to expire at midnight on December 31, 2012.
To provide the statutorily mandated protection to any employee adversely affected by the discontinuance of trackage rights, we will impose the employee protective conditions set forth in Oregon Short Line Railroad–Abandonment Portion Goshen Branch Between Firth & Ammon, in Bingham & Bonneville Counties, Idaho, 360 I.C.C. 91 (1979) (Oregon Short Line).
This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources.
It is ordered:
1. The petition for partial revocation is granted.
2. Under 49 U.S.C. § 10502, the trackage rights described in Docket No. FD 35676 are exempted, as discussed above, to permit the trackage rights to expire at midnight on December 31, 2012, subject to the employee protective conditions set forth in Oregon Short Line.
3. Notice will be published in the Federal Register on December 3, 2012.
4. This decision is effective on December 30, 2012. Petitions to stay must be filed by December 10, 2012. Petitions for reconsideration must be filed by December 20, 2012.
By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice Chairman Mulvey, and Commissioner Begeman.
 The digest constitutes no part of the decision of the Board but has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It may not be cited to or relied upon as precedent. Policy Statement on Plain Language Digests in Decisions, EP 696 (STB served Sept. 2, 2010).
 In that docket, on September 18, 2012, BNSF filed a verified notice of exemption under the Board’s class exemption procedures at 49 C.F.R. § 1180.2(d)(7). The notice covered the agreement by Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) to grant local trackage rights to BNSF over UP’s lines between: (1) UP milepost 93.2 at Stockton, Cal., on UP’s Oakland Subdivision, and UP milepost 219.4 at Elsey, Cal., on UP’s Canyon Subdivision, a distance of 126.2 miles; and (2) UP milepost 219.4 at Elsey, and UP milepost 280.7 at Keddie, Cal., on UP’s Canyon Subdivision, a distance of 61.3 miles. See BNSF Ry.–Temp. Trackage Rights Exemption–Union Pac. R.R., FD 35676 (STB served Oct. 4, 2012). In its petition for partial revocation, BNSF states that the trackage rights are only temporary rights, but, because they are “local” rather than “overhead” rights, they do not qualify for the Board’s class exemption for temporary trackage rights at 49 C.F.R. § 1180.2(d)(8).