| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | AB_55_401 | ||
Case Title:   | CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.--ABANDONMENT--BETWEEN DELPHI AND FRANKFORT, IND. | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING AND MODIFIED THE SECTION 106 HISTORIC PRESERVATION CONDITION. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 159 KB 23 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 86 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
42572 SERVICE
DATE – SEPTEMBER 24, 2012 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. AB 55
(Sub-No. 401) CSX
TRANSPORTATION, INC.—ABANDONMENT—BETWEEN DELPHI AND FRANKFORT, IND. Decided: September 24, 2012 This decision reopens the proceeding
and modifies the existing Section 106 historic preservation condition imposed
in this proceeding. By certificate and decision served
on January 3, 1992 (January 1992 decision), the Board’s predecessor, the
Interstate Commerce Commission (ICC), granted abandonment authority under
49 U.S.C. § 10903 for CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT) to abandon its
25.28-mile line of railroad between milepost QA-112.22 at Delphi and milepost
QA-137.50 at Frankfort, in Carroll and Clinton Counties, Ind. (the line). The January 1992 decision also imposed a
historic preservation condition under Section 106 of the National Historic
Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. § 470 (NHPA).
That condition, recommended by the ICC’s Section of Energy and
Environment (SEE),[1]
requires CSXT to retain its interest in and take no steps to alter the historic
integrity of bridges 113.0 and 121.5 spanning Deer Creek and Wildcat Creek, and
the Depot at Frankfort until the Section 106 process of the NHPA is completed. In a Supplemental Final
Environmental Assessment dated July 30, 2012, OEA states that CSXT recently was
contacted by several groups with concerns about the Wildcat Creek Bridge
located at milepost 121.5. According to
OEA, the Indiana Department of Transportation and the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers have requested that CSXT remove the Wildcat Bridge because, those
agencies state, it has become a danger to navigation and public safety. OEA states that CSXT also believes that the
Wildcat Creek Bridge has become a liability and needs to be dismantled. After
consulting with the Indiana Department of Natural Resources, Division of
Historic Preservation and Archaeology (SHPO), OEA has determined that the demolition
or dismantling of the Wildcat Creek Bridge would be an adverse effect to a
historic property. As a result, OEA
consulted with the SHPO, CSXT, and interested local historic groups to develop
a Memorandum of Agreement (MOA), pursuant to the regulations implementing
Section 106, stipulating the resolution of adverse effects to the Wildcat Creek
Bridge. In the MOA, CSXT agrees to,
among other things, transfer, within two years, ownership of the Deer Creek
Bridge located at milepost 113.0 and the 0.43-mile northern approach to the
Deer Creek Bridge to a qualified trails group in exchange for $1.00, thus
mitigating the loss of the Wildcat Creek Bridge. The MOA was executed on July 9, 2012. OEA states that the filing of the MOA with
the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation completes the Board’s compliance
responsibilities under Section 106 for the Wildcat Creek Bridge. As to the Depot at Frankfort, OEA
states that CSXT informed OEA that it was burned by vandals in 1993 and razed and
that another building is now on the property. For the foregoing reasons, OEA
recommends that the Section 106 historic preservation condition imposed in the
January 1992 decision be modified to remove the Wildcat Creek Bridge and the
Depot at Frankfort from the condition and to replace the existing Section 106
historic preservation condition with a new condition that reads: “CSXT shall retain its interest in and take
no steps to alter the historic integrity of the bridge at milepost 113.0
spanning Deer Creek (the Area of Potential Effect) until the Section 106
process of the NHPA has been completed.
CSXT shall report back to OEA regarding any consultations with the SHPO,
any other Section 106 consulting parties that have been identified, and the
public. CSXT may not relinquish its
interest in or take any steps to alter the historic integrity of the bridge
until the Section 106 process has been completed and the Board has removed this
condition.”[2] Accordingly, this proceeding will be
reopened and the Section 106 historic preservation condition imposed in the
January 1992 decision will be modified as recommended by OEA. Based on OEA’s recommendation, the proposed
abandonment, if implemented as conditioned, will not significantly affect
either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy
resources. It is ordered: 1.
This proceeding is reopened. 2.
Upon reconsideration, the Section 106 historic preservation condition
imposed in the January 1992 decision is replaced with the condition that: CSXT shall retain its interest in and take no
steps to alter the historic integrity of the bridge at milepost 113.0 spanning
Deer Creek (the Area of Potential Effect) until the Section 106 process of the
NHPA has been completed. CSXT shall
report back to OEA regarding any consultations with the SHPO, any other Section
106 consulting parties that have been identified, and the public. CSXT may not relinquish its interest in or
take any steps to alter the historic integrity of the bridge until the Section
106 process has been completed and the Board has removed this condition. 3.
This decision is effective on its date of service. By
the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. [1]
SEE is now the Office
of Environmental Analysis (OEA). [2] Because the revised condition imposed in this
decision prohibits CSXT from relinquishing the Deer Creek Bridge until the
condition is removed, should CSXT reach an agreement with a qualified trails
group for the transfer of the bridge, CSXT will need to seek and obtain removal
of the revised condition before that transfer can be consummated. | |||