| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | FD_35661_0 | ||
Case Title:   | GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD COMPANY--ACQUISITION OF OPERATING EASEMENT--CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION INSTITUTED A PROCEEDING IN THIS DOCKET. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 42 KB 35 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 36 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
42622 SERVICE DATE –
SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. FD 35661 GRAND TRUNK WESTERN RAILROAD
COMPANY—ACQUISITION OF OPERATING EASEMENT—CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC. Decided:
September 11, 2012 On August 13, 2012, Grand Trunk
Western Railroad Company (GTW), an indirect, wholly owned
subsidiary of Canadian National Railway Company (CN), filed a petition for
exemption under 49 U.S.C. § 10502 from the prior approval requirements at 49
U.S.C. §§ 11323-25 to acquire from CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT) an
exclusive, perpetual, non-assignable railroad operating easement over
approximately 2.1 miles of CSXT’s Memphis Terminal Subdivision, between Leewood, Tenn., milepost 00F371.4, and Aulon,
Tenn., milepost 00F373.4 (the Leewood-Aulon Line). The Leewood-Aulon
Line is currently owned by CSXT. Illinois
Central Railroad Company (IC), a GTW affiliate, operates over it via trackage rights. Along
with the proposed easement acquisition by GTW, CSXT would retain local and
overhead trackage rights over the Leewood-Aulon
Line.[1] GTW’s easement acquisition is one
element of an Agreement for Exchange of Perpetual Easements between GTW and
CSXT.[2] In exchange for GTW’s acquiring an easement
from CSXT over the Leewood-Aulon Line, GTW has agreed
to grant CSXT an exclusive, perpetual, non-assignable railroad operating
easement over 22.37 miles of GTW track on the Elsdon
Subdivision between the connection with CSXT at Munster, Ind., milepost 31.07,
and Elsdon, Ill., milepost 8.7, which connects to the
southern end of the BNSF Railway Company’s Corwith
Yard (Elsdon Line).
CSXT currently operates over the Elsdon Line via
trackage rights.[3] As part of CSXT’s acquisition of this easement,
GTW would retain local and overhead trackage rights over
the Elsdon Line.[4] CSXT has
also agreed to convey local and overhead trackage
rights over the line to a number of GTW’s affiliates
and to a CSXT subsidiary, the Baltimore & Ohio Chicago Terminal Railroad
Company. On August 13, 2012, the same
day GTW filed its petition for exemption in this docket, CSXT filed, in Docket
No. FD 35522, an application pursuant to 49 U.S.C. § 11323(a)(2) and 49
C.F.R. pt. 1180 seeking approval for its proposed easement acquisition over the
Elsdon Line,[5]
and notices of exemption were filed in two embraced subdockets
for CSXT’s grants of trackage rights over the Elsdon Line.[6] Today, the Board is issuing a decision
and publishing a notice in the Federal Register
in Docket No. FD 35522 and the two embraced subdockets that accepts that application and the related subdocket filings.
Because
the proposed easement acquisitions in this docket and Docket No. FD 35522 are related parts of the
same overall easement exchange—and indeed, each easement acquisition is essentially
the sole consideration for the other[7]—the
Board is adopting a schedule under which it will consider and rule on the
petition for exemption in this docket and the application in Docket No. FD 35522,
et al., at the same time. To accomplish this goal, today’s decision institutes a
proceeding in this docket[8] and adopts a procedural schedule
that generally matches the schedule announced for Docket No. FD 35522,
et al.[9] Under the procedural schedule for Docket No.
FD 35661: any person who wishes to
participate in this proceeding as a party of record must file a notice of
intent to participate no later than September 26, 2012; all comments, protests,
requests for conditions, and any other evidence and argument in opposition to
the petition, must be filed by November 9, 2012; and responses to comments,
protests, requests for conditions, and other opposition, as well as
petitioner’s rebuttal in support of the petition, must be filed by November 29,
2012. The Board plans to issue its final
decision by February 8, 2013. It
is ordered: 1. Under 49 U.S.C. § 10502(b),
a proceeding is instituted in this docket. 2. Interested parties are directed to follow the
procedural schedule in the attached Appendix A. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. APPENDIX A: PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE August 13, 2012 GTW’s
petition for exemption filed with the Board. September
26, 2012 Notices of intent to
participate due. November
9, 2012 Comments due from all parties
on the petition for exemption. November
29, 2012 Replies to comments due. Petitioner’s rebuttal in
support of the petition due. February
8, 2013 Final decision served. [1] CSXT’s retained trackage rights would limit the total number of CSXT trains operating over the Leewood-Aulon Line to 16 trains per day, but the parties may agree to increase that number. See CSX Transp., Inc.—Acquis. of Operating Easement—Grand Trunk W. R.R., FD 35522, application, vol. 2, Exh. E of Exh. F, § 3.2 (filed August 13, 2012). [2] See CSX Transp., Inc.—Acquis. of Operating Easement—Grand Trunk W. R.R., FD 35522, application, vol. 2 (filed Aug. 13, 2012). Volume 2 includes this overarching agreement and a number of related agreements. [3] See CSX
Transp., Inc.—Trackage Rights Exemption—Grand Trunk
W. R.R., FD 35346 (STB served Feb. 12, 2010). [4] In the agreement by which GTW is retaining trackage rights over the Elsdon Line, GTW (referred to in the agreement as CN) agrees that its traffic shall not be limited over the line, except that the total number of CN/Union Pacific Railroad Company interchange trains using the Line between Blue Island (at or near milepost 19.3) and Munster (Milepost 31.07) is limited to two trains in each direction per day. See CSX Transp., Inc.—Acquis. of Operating Easement—Grand Trunk W. R.R., FD 35522, application, vol. 2, p. 2 and Exh. E of Exh. E, § 3.2 (Filed August 13, 2012). The agreement in Docket No. 35522 (Sub-No. 2) in which CSXT grants trackage rights to the GTW affiliates includes a similar limit to two trains in each direction per day. See CSX Transp., Inc.—Acquis. of Operating Easement—Grand Trunk W. R.R., FD 35522, application, vol. 2, Exh. F of Exh. E, § 3.2 (filed Aug. 13, 2012). [5]
See CSX
Transp. Inc.—Acquis. of
Operating Easement—Grand Trunk W. R.R., FD 35522 (application filed
Aug. 13, 2012). Volume 2 of the application
filed in Docket No. FD 35522 includes the agreement for GTW’s easement
over the Leewood-Aulon Line and the agreement for
CSXT to retain trackage rights over that line. A protective order is being served today in
Docket No. FD 35522.
The proceeding in this Docket No. 35661 is considered a “related
proceeding” under the terms of that protective order. [6] See Balt. & Ohio Chi. Terminal R.R.—Trackage Rights Exemption—CSX Transp., Inc., FD 35522 (Sub-No. 1) (verified notice of exemption filed Aug. 13, 2012, in volume 3 of the application in FD 35522); Chi., Cent. & Pac. R.R., Elgin, Joliet & E. R.R., Ill. Cent. R.R., & Wisc. Cent. Ltd.—Trackage Rights Exemption—CSX Transp., Inc., FD 35522 (Sub-No. 2) (verified notice of exemption filed Aug. 13, 2012, in volume 3 of the application in FD 35522). [7] See CSX
Transp., Inc.—Acquis. of
Operating Easement—Grand Trunk W. R.R., FD 35522, application, vol. 1, p. 5 (filed Aug. 13, 2012). [8] The Board
must decide whether to begin an appropriate proceeding within 90 days after
receiving a petition for exemption. Any
proceeding shall be completed with nine months after it is begun. See 49 U.S.C. § 10502(b).
[9] An environmental review is not necessary for GTW to acquire the easement over the Leewood-Aulon Line. GTW explains in its petition that the proposed acquisition would not result in any operational changes that would exceed the thresholds of 49 C.F.R. § 1105.7(e)(4) and (5), and that this Tennessee transaction would not result in any action that would normally require environmental documentation. Additionally, as noted by GTW, under 49 C.F.R. § 1105.8(b)(1), this proposed easement acquisition is also exempt from historic preservation reporting requirements. | |||