| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | MCF_21035_0 | ||
Case Title:   | STAGECOACH GROUP PLC AND COACH USA, INC., ET AL.—ACQUISITION OF CONTROL—TWIN AMERICA, LLC | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS PROCEEDING. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 18 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 28 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
40565 SERVICE DATE – LATE RELEASE JANUARY 29, 2010 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION STB Docket No. MC-F-21035 STAGECOACH GROUP PLC AND COACH USA, INC., ET AL.– ACQUISTION OF
CONTROL–TWIN Decided: January 29, 2010 On August 19, 2009, Stagecoach Group PLC, a noncarrier, its noncarrier intermediate subsidiaries (Stagecoach Transport Holdings plc, SCUSI Ltd., Coach USA Administration, Inc.), Coach USA, Inc., International Bus Services, a motor passenger carrier (MC-155937) controlled by Coach USA, City Sights Twin, LLC, a noncarrier, and Mr. Zev Marmurstein (collectively, Applicants), filed an application under 49 U.S.C. 14303 to acquire control of Twin America, LLC when it becomes a carrier. By decision served January 12, 2010, the Board adopted a procedural schedule to allow interested persons to submit additional comments and evidence in opposition to the application. On January 27, 2010, Applicants filed a motion for protective order under 49 CFR 1104.14(b) to submit confidential documents or information in this proceeding. On January 28, 2010, the New York
State Attorney General (NYSAG) filed a reply in opposition to the motion for
protective order. The NYSAG argues that
the protective order would contravene section 343 of the New York General
Business Law and would restrain the Attorney General from disclosing
information uncovered in its ongoing investigation involving the
Applicants. The NYSAG also argues that
Applicants have already disclosed confidential documents and have cited from
confidential documents in the pleadings before the Board and in the state
investigation, thus waiving their right to claim them as covered by the
protective order. The protective order will be issued, as attached in Appendix A. First, the Board is not precluded by state
law from issuing a protective order.
Such an order may provide that parties who are required to disclose
commercially sensitive information in connection with a proceeding must hold
that information in confidence and undertake that they are willing to do
so. Second, the effect of this order is
prospective only. Disclosures that
Applicants have made of commercially sensitive information to NYSAG before the
issuance of this order lie beyond the scope of the order. Moreover, the scope of the order governs only
the use of commercially sensitive information in connection with this
proceeding. NYSAG has not explained, nor
does the record before us indicate, how an undertaking to treat commercially
sensitive information in confidence would inhibit a criminal investigation or
prosecution. Applicants submit that a protective
order is necessary because the comments and reply comments may contain
commercially sensitive and confidential information that could cause
competitive or other harm to Applicants if they were made
public. The motion conforms with the
Board’s rules at 49 CFR 1104.14 governing protective orders to maintain the
confidentiality of materials submitted to the Board. Issuance of the protective order will ensure
that confidential information will be used solely for this proceeding and not
for other purposes. Accordingly, the
motion for protective order will be granted and any
confidential information shall be subject to the Protective Order and
Undertaking as modified in the Appendix to this decision.[1]
This decision will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources. It is ordered: 1. The Protective Order and Undertaking in the Appendix to this decision are adopted. 2. This decision is effective on its service date. By the Board, Joseph H. Dettmar, Acting Director, Office of Proceedings.
APPENDIX A PROTECTIVE ORDER 1. For the purposes of this Protective Order: (a) “Confidential Documents” means documents
and other tangible materials containing or reflecting Confidential Information. (b) “Confidential Information” means traffic
data (including but not limited to study movement sheets and databases),
financial and cost data, business plans, market assessments, and other
confidential or proprietary business or personal information. (c) “Designated Material” means any
documents designated or stamped as “CONFIDENTIAL” in accordance with paragraph
3 of this Protective Order, and any Confidential Information contained in such
materials. (d) These “Proceedings” consist of STB
Finance Docket No. MC-F-21035, and any related
proceedings before the Surface Transportation Board (Board) and any judicial
review proceedings arising from STB Finance Docket No. MC-F-21035
or from any related proceedings before the Board. 2. If any party to these Proceedings
determines that any part of a document it submits, of a discovery request or
response, of a transcript of a deposition or hearing, or of a pleading or other
paper filed or served in these Proceedings contains Confidential Information or
consists of Confidential Documents, then that party may designate and stamp
such Confidential Information and Confidential Documents as
“CONFIDENTIAL.” Any information or
documents designated or stamped as “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be handled as provided
for hereafter. 3. Designated
material and any copies, data or notes derived therefrom: (a) Shall be
used solely for the purpose of these Proceedings. (b) May be
disclosed only to counsel of the party requesting or receiving such material, counsel’s
support staff, or outside experts or consultants retained in this proceeding
who have a need to know, handle, or review the material for purposes of these
Proceedings, and only where such counsel, counsel’s support staff, or outside
expert or consultant has been given and has read a copy of this Protective
Order, agrees to be bound by its terms, and executes the attached Undertaking
for Confidential Material prior to receiving access to such materials. (c) Must be
destroyed by the requesting or receiving party at the completion of these
Proceedings. However, counsel and
consultants for a party are permitted to retain file copies of all pleadings
which they were authorized to review under this Protective Order. (d) Shall, in
order to be kept confidential, be submitted to the Board under seal in a
package clearly marked on the outside “Confidential Materials Subject to
Protective Order.” See 49 CFR
1104.14. (e) Shall be
clearly labeled as “CONFIDENTIAL” in any submission made to the Board. 4. If any party intends to use
“CONFIDENTIAL” material at any hearings in these Proceedings, the party so
intending shall submit any proposed exhibits or other documents setting forth
or revealing such “CONFIDENTIAL” material to the Board, or the court, as
appropriate, with a written request that the Board or the court: (a) restrict attendance at the hearings
during discussion of such “CONFIDENTIAL” material; and (b) restrict access to
the portion of the record or briefs reflecting discussion of such “CONFIDENTIAL”
material in accordance with the terms of this Protective Order. 5. Any party to these Proceedings may
challenge the designation by any other party of information or documents as
“CONFIDENTIAL” by filing a motion with the Board or with an administrative law
judge or other officer to whom authority has been lawfully delegated by the
Board to adjudicate such challenge(s). 6. Except for these Proceedings, the
parties agree that if a party is required by law or order of a governmental or
judicial body to release any “CONFIDENTIAL” material as to which it obtained
access subject to this Protective Order, the party so required shall notify the
producing party in writing within 3 working days of the determination that the
“CONFIDENTIAL” material, or copies or notes are to be released, or within 3
working days prior to such release, whichever is soonest, to permit the
producing party the opportunity to contest the release. 7. Information that is publicly available
from a person with a right to disclose it shall not be subject to this
Protective Order even if the same information is produced and designated as
“CONFIDENTIAL” in this proceeding. 8. Any party filing with the Board a
“CONFIDENTIAL” pleading in this proceeding should simultaneously file a public
version of the pleading. UNDERTAKING CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL I,
_______________________________, [as outside counsel or support staff] or [as
outside consultant or expert] have read the Protective Order served on January
29, 2010, governing the production of confidential documents in STB MC-F-21035,
understand the same, and agree to be bound by its terms. I agree not to use or permit the use of any
data or information obtained under this Undertaking, or to use or permit the
use of any techniques disclosed or information learned as a result of receiving
such data or information, for any purposes other than the preparation and
presentation of evidence and argument in STB Finance Docket No. MC-F-21035 or any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom. I
further agree not to disclose any data or information obtained under this
Protective Order to any person who has not executed an Undertaking in the form
hereof. At the conclusion of this
proceeding and any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom,
I will promptly destroy any copies of such designated documents obtained or
made by me or by any outside counsel or outside consultants working with me,
provided, however, that counsel and consultants may retain copies of pleadings
which they were authorized to review under the Protective Order. I understand and agree that money damages would not be a sufficient
remedy for breach of this Undertaking and that parties producing confidential
documents shall be entitled to specific performance and injunctive or other equitable
relief as a remedy for any such breach, and I further agree to waive any
requirement for the securing or posting of any bond in connection with such
remedy. Such remedy shall not be
deemed to be the exclusive remedy for breach of this Undertaking but shall be
in addition to all remedies available at law or equity. ___________________________________ Dated:______________________________ | |||