| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | MCF_21047_0 | ||
Case Title:   | FRANK SHERMAN, FSCS CORPORATION, TMS WEST COAST, INC., EVERGREEN TRAILS, INC. AND CABAMA COACHES, LLC-ACQUISTION AND CONSOLIDATION OF ASSESTS-AMERICA CHARTERS, LTD, AMERICAN COACH LINES OF JACKSONVILLE, INC., AMERICAN COACH LINES OF MIAMI, INC., AMERICAN COACH LINES OF ORLANDO, INC., CUSA, ASL, LLC, CUSA BCCAE, LLC CUSA, CC, LLC, CUSA |FL, LLC, CUSA GCBS, LLC, CUSA, GCT, CUSAK-TCS, LLC, AND MIDNIGHT SUN TOURS, ICNC. | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Entire Board | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED THE REQUEST FILED BY FRANK SHERMAN AND VARIOUS CARRIER AND NON CARRIER ENTITIES CONTROLLED BY HIM FOR APPROVAL TO ACQUIRE THE ASSETS OF 12 SEPARATE INTERSTATE MOTOR PASSENGER COMMON CARRIER SUBSIDIARIES CURRENTLY CONTROLLED BY COACH AMERICA HOLDINGS, INC. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 58 KB 44 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 48 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
42654 SERVICE DATE – SEPTEMBER 6, 2012 EB SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. MCF 21047 FRANK
SHERMAN, FSCS CORPORATION, TMS WEST COAST, INC., EVERGREEN
TRAILS, INC. AND CABANA COACHES, LLC - ACQUISITION AND
CONSOLIDATION OF ASSETS - AMERICA CHARTERS, LTD., AMERICAN
COACH LINES OF JACKSONVILLE, INC., AMERICAN COACH LINES
OF MIAMI, INC., AMERICAN COACH LINES OF ORLANDO, INC., CUSA
ASL, LLC, CUSA BCCAE, LLC, CUSA CC, LLC, CUSA FL, LLC, CUSA GCBS,
LLC, CUSA GCT, LLC, CUSA K-TCS, LLC, AND MIDNIGHT SUN TOURS, INC. Digest:[1] This decision grants the request filed by Frank
Sherman and various carrier and noncarrier entities
controlled by him for approval to acquire the assets of 12 separate interstate
motor passenger common carrier subsidiaries currently controlled by Coach
America Holdings, Inc. Decided: September
5, 2012 On June 4, 2012,
Frank Sherman (Sherman) together with FSCS Corporation (FSCS), TMS West Coast,
Inc. (TMS West), Evergreen Trails, Inc. d/b/a Horizon Coach Lines (Evergreen), and
Cabana Coaches, LLC (Cabana) (collectively, Applicants) filed an application under
49 U.S.C. § 14303 and the Board’s regulations at 49 C.F.R. pt. 1182 to acquire
the assets of 12 separate interstate motor passenger common carrier
subsidiaries of noncarrier Coach America Holdings,
Inc. (Coach America)—American Charters, Ltd. (Charters); American Coach Lines
of Jacksonville, Inc.
(Coach-Jacksonville); American Coach Lines of Miami, Inc. (Coach-Miami);
American Coach Lines of Orlando, Inc. (Coach-Orlando); CUSA ASL, LLC; CUSA
BCCAE, LLC; CUSA CC, LLC; CUSA FL, LLC; CUSA GCBS, LLC; CUSA GCT, LLC; CUSA
K-TCS, LLC; and Midnight Sun Tours, Inc. (Midnight Sun) (collectively, Coach America
Subsidiaries)—and to consolidate certain of those assets into Evergreen and
others into Cabana. Notice
of the finance application was served and published in the Federal Register
on July 3, 2012 (77 Fed. Reg. 39,571). A copy of the notice was also served on the
U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration
(FMCSA); the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division; the U.S.
Department of Transportation, Office of the General Counsel; the Federal Trade
Commission, Bureau of Competition, Premerger Notification Office; and two
parties that had filed comments in opposition to the proposed transaction: Michael Yusim, an
individual, and the Ventura County Transportation Commission
(VCTC).[2] Based on our review of the record, we are
granting the application. BACKGROUND Sherman, an individual who controls motor passenger carriers, owns and controls over 95% of the stock of FSCS. FSCS, a noncarrier holding company incorporated in the State of Maryland, owns TMS West, a noncarrier holding company incorporated in the State of Washington; TMS Canada Holdings Ltd. (TMS Canada), a Canadian holding company; and Cabana, an interstate motor passenger carrier incorporated in the State of Maryland and headquartered in the State of Florida. TMS Canada owns Horizon Coach Lines, Ltd. (Horizon), a motor passenger carrier registered and based in British Columbia, Can. that operates in Canada and the United States. TMS West owns Evergreen, an interstate motor passenger carrier incorporated and headquartered in the State of Washington. The
transaction contemplates that: (1) the
assets of Charters; Coach-Jacksonville; Coach-Orlando; CUSA ASL, LLC; CUSA
BCCAE, LLC; CUSA CC, LLC; CUSA FL, LLC; CUSA GCBS, LLC; CUSA GCT, LLC; and CUSA
K-TCS, LLC, would be purchased by either FSCS or Evergreen to be operated under
the Horizon Coach Lines name; and (2) the assets of Coach-Miami and Midnight
Sun would be purchased by either FSCS or Cabana and consolidated into
Cabana. Cabana would also adopt the
d/b/a name “Horizon Coach Lines,” and the assets consolidated into Cabana would
be operated under that name. Under an
asset purchase agreement, see infra, another company controlled
by Sherman, Transportation Management Services, Inc. (TMS), obtained the right
to purchase the Coach America Subsidiaries.
TMS is to assign its right to purchase to either FSCS or to Evergreen
and Cabana. If TMS assigns its right to
purchase to Evergreen and Cabana, Cabana will receive the right to purchase the
assets of Coach-Miami and Midnight Sun, and Evergreen will receive the right to
purchase the assets of all of the other Coach America Subsidiaries identified
above. [3] Evergreen, Cabana, and each of the 12 Coach
America Subsidiaries currently hold charter and/or regular route
interstate operating authority issued by FMCSA.[4] The Coach
America Subsidiaries are currently involved in proceedings instituted under
Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, having filed a voluntary petition for relief
with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on January 3, 2012.
On January 13, 2012, the Coach America
Subsidiaries also filed a motion to sell substantially all of their assets and
effectively to liquidate. According to
Applicants, the proposed acquisition is evidenced by an Asset Purchase
Agreement that was entered into by the parties on May 18, 2012, and was
approved by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware at a hearing
on May 22, 2012. DISCUSSION
AND CONCLUSIONS Jurisdiction Under 49 U.S.C. §§
14303(a)[5]
and (g), transactions effecting the acquisition of motor passenger carrier
assets require Board approval where they involve a purchase,
lease, or contract to operate property of another carrier by any number of
carriers whose aggregate gross
operating revenues exceed $2 million during a period of 12 consecutive months
ending not more than six months before the date of agreement of the
parties. Here Applicants seek to acquire
the assets of a number of motor passenger carriers
whose aggregate gross
operating revenues exceeded $2 million during the 12-month period preceding the
filing date of the application.
Accordingly, Board approval of the proposed transaction is required. Statutory Standard for
Approval Under 49 U.S.C. §
14303(b), we must approve and authorize a transaction that we find consistent
with the public interest, taking into consideration at least: (1) the effect of the transaction on the
adequacy of transportation to the public; (2) the total fixed charges that
result; and (3) the interest of the affected carrier employees. In determining whether the transaction is
consistent with the public interest, the Board may evaluate other factors,
including whether the transaction would have any anticompetitive effects. Adequacy of
transportation to the public. Applicants assert that the proposed
transaction will benefit the traveling public.
Specifically, they contend that the
transaction will consolidate the assets and operations of the Coach America
Subsidiaries into Applicants’ financially
healthy group of carriers. This, they
claim, will give the Coach
America Subsidiaries greater
access to working capital, better credit ratings, and reduced borrowing costs,
which in turn will facilitate any borrowing needed for fleet modernization and
other improvements that will benefit the traveling public. The traveling public, according to
Applicants, will benefit from the Coach America Subsidiaries having greater access to capital resources, favorable
debt restructuring, significant interest cost savings, and reduced operating
costs resulting from enhanced volume purchasing. In addition, Applicants contend that the
services provided by the Coach America
Subsidiaries will benefit from more
centralized management, which will facilitate savings in such administrative
areas as accounting, coordinated purchasing services, coordinated driver
training services, and vehicle sharing to ensure maximum utilization and
operational efficiency of equipment. Applicants also assert
that the proposed transaction will have no adverse impact on competition. They
state that the competition between the Coach America Subsidiaries on the one
hand and Evergreen or Cabana on the other hand is very limited. In the Houston,
Tex. area, Applicants note
that CUSA GCT, LLC, provides charter and commuter contract services, whereas
Evergreen primarily focuses on contract operations for cruise lines and large
events such as conventions and trade shows.
In the Miami, Fla. area, Applicants note that charter operations account
for almost two thirds of Coach-Miami’s business and that contract business with
cruise lines accounts for about 14% of its revenues, whereas charter operations
account for about 10% of Cabana’s business and contract business with cruise
lines accounts for about 90% of its revenues. Applicants assert that many other motor
passenger carriers in the Miami area compete for this business and that Evergreen
and Cabana will continue to face competition from private vehicles and other
transportation modes with respect to the services at issue. Fixed charges. Applicants assert that the transaction will not have a material adverse impact on fixed charges associated with the services currently provided by the Coach America Subsidiaries, Evergreen, and Cabana. They note that interest charges associated with the operations currently provided by the Coach America Subsidiaries should decline as a result of the proposed transaction. Affected carrier employees. Applicants state that under the terms of the purchase agreement, they will make “at will” employment offers to at least 75% of the employees primarily related to the businesses to be acquired at the time of the transaction closing. In addition, Applicants state that a number of the Coach America Subsidiaries—Charters; CUSA BCCAE, LLC; CUSA CC, LLC; CUSA FL, LLC; CUSA GCBS, LLC; CUSA GCT, LLC; and CUSA K-TCS, LLC— hold intrastate operating authorities that will be transferred to Evergreen as a result of the transaction. They assert that under 49 U.S.C. § 14303(f), Board approval of the proposed transaction would allow the acquisition of the assets of the Coach America Subsidiaries to be accomplished without the need for potentially prolonged formal action by any state regulatory authorities, relieving Applicants from burdensome regulatory requirements. Applicants
certify that: (1) Evergreen, Cabana, and
the Coach America Subsidiaries hold satisfactory safety ratings from the FMCSA;
(2) Evergreen, Cabana, and the Coach America Subsidiaries have the requisite
insurance coverage under 49 U.S.C. § 13906; and (3) neither
Evergreen nor Cabana and none of the Coach America Subsidiaries are domiciled
in Mexico or owned or controlled by persons of that country. Noting that the proposed transaction only
involves the acquisition and consolidation of carrier assets that are already
used to provide bus services, Applicants also assert that the proposed transaction
will result in no significant operational changes or have adverse environmental
impacts. On June 6, 2012, Michael Yusim filed a letter in opposition to both the request for interim approval and this application for permanent authority. Mr. Yusim contends that Midnight Sun discriminated against him and another driver employed by Midnight Sun for accurately reporting their hours of service under the rules administered by the FMCSA. He states that the two cases are pending before the U. S. Secretary of Labor (Secretary) and have been stayed by the Bankruptcy Court. Mr. Yusim requests that the Board, in the public interest, disallow the sale of any subsidiaries of Coach America until the Secretary is allowed to hear and decide the two cases, and that Applicants be required to produce certain documents relating to hours of service reporting.[6] In a response
filed on June 11, 2012, Applicants assert that Mr. Yusim
has filed multiple motions in the Bankruptcy Court seeking relief from the
automatic stay provisions of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 362, and objecting to the proposed sale
of Midnight
Sun. They claim that the bankruptcy
court has denied Mr. Yusim’s requests and has refused
to permit his individual claims against Midnight Sun to move forward. According to Applicants, the bankruptcy court
will consider Mr. Yusim’s claims in due course,
consistent with customary practice, and if his claims are valid he may receive
distributions along with other unsecured creditors, in accordance with the
priorities of the Bankruptcy Code. The
proposed transaction is intended to transfer the assets of Midnight Sun and the
other Coach America Subsidiaries to Applicants, and Applicants had nothing to
do with the cases that are pending before the Secretary and the Bankruptcy Court. These cases are against Midnight Sun and its
parent entities, and as such they may go forward in the appropriate forums without
delaying a transaction that is in the public interest—one that is intended to ensure
a continuation of the many transportation services currently provided by the
Coach America Subsidiaries. Thus, we
will not delay our consideration of the proposed transaction, nor will we require
Applicants to produce documents relating to hours of service reporting with
respect to claims that are within the purview of the Secretary and the Bankruptcy
Court and are expected to be addressed by them in due course. Applicants
have submitted the information required by 49 C.F.R. § 1182.2(a)(7). Specifically,
Applicants have submitted information sufficient to demonstrate that the
proposed transaction is consistent with the public interest under 49 U.S.C. § 14303(b), in
that it should
have a positive effect on the adequacy of transportation to the public—including
no adverse impact on competition—and should not result in an increase in fixed
charges. Moreover, Applicants plan to
offer employment to the majority of the employees primarily related to the
businesses to be acquired.[7] Accordingly, we find that the proposed
transaction is consistent with the public interest under § 14303(b)
and is otherwise necessary to ensure continued motor passenger service to the traveling
public. Therefore, we are approving
and authorizing the proposed
transaction, as required when such findings are made under § 14303(b).
This action will
not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the
conservation of energy resources. It
is ordered: 1.
Applicants are granted permanent
authority to acquire the assets of the Coach America Subsidiaries, as discussed
above. 2.
This decision is effective on its service date. 3.
A copy of this decision will be served on: (1) the U.S. Department of Transportation,
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.,
Washington, DC 20590; (2) the U.S. Department of Justice, Antitrust Division,
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20530; (3) the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Office of the General Counsel, 1200 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.,
Washington, DC 20590; (4) the Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Competition,
Premerger Notification Office, 600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC
20580; (5) Michael Yusim, 7499 Eagle Point Drive,
Delray Beach, FL 33446; and (6) the Ventura County
Transportation Commission, represented by Mitchel B. Kahn, 300 Esplanade
Dr., Suite 1170, Oxnard, CA 93036. By the Board, Chairman
Elliott, Vice Chairman Mulvey, and Commissioner Begeman. [1] The digest constitutes no part of the decision of the Board but has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It may not be cited to or relied upon as precedent. Policy Statement on Plain Language Digests in Decisions, EP 696 (STB served Sept. 2, 2010). [2] On June 19, 2012, VCTC, a California public agency that operates a regional bus system, filed a Request for Delay. VCTC withdrew the request on June 29, 2012. [3] A request for interim approval to acquire management and operational control of the assets under 49 U.S.C. § 14303(i) was included in this filing (Docket No. MCF 21047 TA). In a decision served on June 29, 2012, interim approval was granted, effective on the service date of the decision. In that decision, the Board specified that “to the extent valid leases and other contracts are associated with the assets being acquired, Applicants are reminded that these leases and other contracts must be honored consistent with the language in § 14303(i) concerning the provision ‘of adequate and continuous service to the public. [4] CUSA GCBS, LLC, and CUSA K-TCS, LLC, discontinued operations in April 2012. The assets of these companies will be consolidated into Evergreen, but Evergreen does not plan to resume the services previously offered by these companies. [5] The provisions of 49 U.S.C. § 14303(a) state
as follows: (a)
Approval Required.—The following
transactions involving motor carriers of passengers
subject to jurisdiction under subchapter I of chapter 135 may be carried out only with the
approval of the Board: (1)
Consolidation or merger of the
properties or franchises of at least 2 carriers into one
operation for the ownership, management, and operation of the previously separately
owned properties. (2)
A purchase, lease, or contract to
operate property of another carrier by any number
of carriers. (3)
Acquisition of control of a carrier by
any number of carriers. (4) Acquisition of control of at least 2 carriers by a person that is not a carrier. (5)
Acquisition of control of a carrier by a
person that is not a carrier but that controls any number of carriers. [6] Mr. Yusim reiterated these arguments in a filing on June 12, 2012, in response to Applicants’ June 11, 2012 reply to Mr. Yusim’s initial letter in opposition and again on August 22, 2012, in response to Applicants’ August 20, 2012 reply in support of the application and request for an expedited decision. While 49 C.F.R. § 1104.13(c) prohibits the filing of a reply to a reply, we will accept Applicants’ June 11, 2012 filing and Mr. Yusim’s June 12 and August 22, 2012 filings in the interest of compiling a complete record. Our acceptance of these additional filings will neither prejudice any party nor prolong our reaching a decision. [7] Although Mr. Yusim makes broad allegations that this proposed transaction is not in the public interest, he provides no specific evidence challenging Applicants’ representations under the three-part criteria of § 14303(b). | |||