SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT
    Decision Information

Docket Number:  
FD_35302_0

Case Title:  
BELL OIL TERMINAL, INC. V. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY

Decision Type:  
Decision

Deciding Body:  
Director Of Proceedings

    Decision Summary

Decision Notes:  
DECISION GRANTED THE REQUEST, FILED BY BELL OIL TERMINAL, INC. AND BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, TO EXTEND THE MEDIATION PERIOD IN THIS PROCEEDING UNTIL DECEMBER 1, 2010.

    Decision Attachments

9 KB


Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 18 Seconds

Note:
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com.

    Full Text of Decision

35729

41212 SERVICE DATE – LATE RELEASE NOVEMBER 10, 2010

DO

 

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

 

DECISION

 

Docket No. FD 35302

 

BELL OIL TERMINAL, INC. v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY

 

Decided: November 10, 2010

 

On October 6, 2009, Bell Oil Terminal, Inc. (Bell Oil), filed a complaint against BNSF Railway Company (BNSF), alleging that BNSF has violated 49 U.S.C. 11103 by failing to construct, maintain, and operate a switch connection between BNSF’s rail line and a private side track to be constructed by Bell Oil at its Pulaski Terminal in Chicago, Ill., and asking the Board to require BNSF to do so. On October 26, 2010, BNSF separately filed an answer and a motion to dismiss the complaint, alleging that Bell Oil’s complaint is premature.

 

On May 19, 2010, Bell Oil and BNSF jointly filed a written request that the Board mediate this dispute and issue a 60-day “housekeeping” stay to permit the Board-supervised mediation. By decision served on June 4, 2010, the Board ordered a 60-day period for nonbinding mediation and held this proceeding in abeyance for 60 days (until August 3, 2010), while the parties pursued a mediated agreement.[1] At the request of the parties, the mediation period was subsequently extended until November 1, 2010, and the proceeding was held in abeyance until then.

 

In a letter filed on October 28, 2010, Bell Oil requests that the Board extend the mediation process for an additional 30 days, or until December 1, 2010, and represents that it is authorized to state that BNSF supports the requested extension. Bell Oil also indicates that the parties have made some progress, but need more time to resolve their dispute through mediation.

 

The request is reasonable and will be granted. Accordingly, the time for mediation will be extended until December 1, 2010, and the proceeding will be held in abeyance until then while the parties pursue a mediated agreement.

 

This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources.

 

It is ordered:

 

1. The request to extend the time to mediate is granted, and the mediation period is extended until December 1, 2010.

 

2. The proceeding is held in abeyance until December 1, 2010, while mediation between the parties is ongoing.

 

3. This decision is effective on its date of service.

 

By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings.

 



[1] A request from Bell Oil to hold the complaint in abeyance pending the disposition of the motion to dismiss currently is pending before the Board. It will be considered in a subsequent decision, if necessary.