| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | NOR_42119_0 | ||
Case Title:   | NORTH AMERICA FREIGHT CAR ASSOCIATION V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION EXTENDED THE DUE DATE FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE A REQUEST FOR MEDIATION OR A PROPOSED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE TO DECEMBER 10, 2010, AND HOLDS THIS PROCEEDING IN ABEYANCE UNTIL THEN. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 9 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 17 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
41093 SERVICE DATE –
SEPTEMBER 22, 2010 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. NOR 42119 Decided: September
21, 2010 This decision extends the due date by which the parties
are to file either a request for mediation or a proposed procedural schedule
and holds the proceeding in abeyance until then. On April 15, 2010, North America Freight Car Association
(NAFCA) filed a complaint against Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP), alleging
that provisions of Item 200-A of UP’s Freight Tariff 6004 Series constitute
unreasonable practices and violations of UP’s common carrier obligation. On May 5, 2010, UP filed an answer to
the complaint, generally denying NAFCA’s allegations. By decisions served on June 8, 2010, and August 13, 2010,
the proceeding was held in abeyance until September 10, 2010, so that the
parties could engage in informal discovery and consider mediation to resolve
this dispute or narrow the issues.[1] The parties
also were directed, jointly or separately, to file either a request for
mediation or a proposed procedural schedule by September 10, 2010. In a letter filed on September 10, 2010, NAFCA requests
that the Board extend the negotiation/mediation process until December 10,
2010, and that the proceeding continue to be held in abeyance. In its letter, NAFCA states that UP joins in
this request. NAFCA also states that the
parties have had several conversations and have agreed to explore a settlement
through private negotiations or mediation.
NAFCA states that UP is developing a written outline proposal and that
the parties have scheduled settlement meetings for September and October. The
request is reasonable. The due date for
the parties, jointly or separately, to file either a request for mediation or,
if the parties no longer wish to consider mediation, a proposed procedural
schedule will be extended from September 10, 2010, to December 10, 2010, and
the proceeding will be held in abeyance until that date. This action will not
significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the
conservation of energy resources. It is ordered: 1. The response date for the parties, jointly or
separately, to file either a request for mediation or a proposed procedural
schedule is extended to December 10, 2010. 2. The proceeding
is held in abeyance until December 10, 2010. 3.
This decision is effective on its date of service. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of
Proceedings. [1] On
June 25, 2010, NAFCA filed a motion for a protective order to facilitate
informal discovery, to which UP concurred.
By decision served on July 12, 2010, the motion for a protective order
was granted, and a protective order was adopted. | |||