| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | NOR_42126_0 | ||
Case Title:   | UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY D.B.A. AMEREN MISSOURI AND MISSOURI CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION: (1) ADOPTED THE PARTIES' PROPOSED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE; AND (2) ADOPTED THE PARTIES' PROPOSED MODIFICATION TO THE PROTECTIVE ORDER AND UNDERTAKINGS. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 14 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 23 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
41354 SERVICE
DATE – LATE RELEASE JANUARY 14, 2011 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD Docket No. NOR 42126 UNION ELECTRIC COMPANY D.B.A. AMEREN MISSOURI AND
MISSOURI CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY Docket No. FD 33508 MISSOURI CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY –ACQUISITION AND OPERATION EXEMPTION– LINES OF UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY Docket No. FD 33537 GRC HOLDINGS CORPORATION –ACQUISITION EXEMPTION– LINES OF UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY REQUEST FOR PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE Decided: January
14, 2011 This decision establishes a procedural schedule for
this proceeding and modifies the protective order and undertakings previously
adopted for this proceeding. On January 3, 2011, Union Electric Company d/b/a Ameren Missouri (Ameren
Missouri) and the Missouri Central Railroad Company (MCRR) (collectively,
Ameren/MCRR)
and Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) jointly filed a report on their
conference held pursuant to 49 C.F.R. § 1111.10. The report contains a proposed procedural schedule,
as follows: Discovery Closes March
18, 2011 Opening Evidence of Ameren/MCRR April 18, 2011 Reply Evidence of UP June 17, 2011 Rebuttal Evidence of Ameren/MCRR July 18, 2011 The proposed procedural schedule will be adopted for
this proceeding. The parties are reminded that they may
request a staff-supervised discovery conference. In an effort to maintain the procedural
schedule that will be adopted here, the parties are encouraged to request such
a conference sufficiently in advance of the close of the discovery period to
permit resolution of the dispute. The report
also contains a request to make the following modifications to the protective
order and undertakings adopted by the Board in its decision served December 21,
2010 in this proceeding:
and
in-house counsel for a party are permitted to retain file copies of all
pleadings that they were authorized to review under this Protective Order
and in-house counsel may retain
file copies of all pleadings that they were authorized to review. The parties state that these
modifications to the protective order and undertakings will allow in-house
counsel for parties to retain copies of pleadings that contain materials that
they would be permitted to review under the protective order and are consistent
with protective orders previously adopted by the Board. The proposed modifications are reasonable and
will be adopted. This decision will not
significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the
conservation of energy resources. It
is ordered: 1. The parties’ proposed procedural
schedule is adopted. 2.
The parties’ proposed modifications to the protective order and
undertakings are adopted. 3. This decision is effective on its service
date. By
the Board, Joseph H. Dettmar, Acting Director, Office
of Proceedings. | |||