| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | NOR_42130_0 | ||
Case Title:   | SUNBELT CHLOR ALKALI PARTNERSHIP V. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS PROCEEDING. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 39 KB 31 KB 87 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 74 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
41839 SERVICE
DATE – SEPTEMBER 6, 2011 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. NOR 42130 v. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Decided: September 2, 2011 This
decision grants a motion for a protective order for this proceeding. Sunbelt
Chlor Alkali Partnership challenges the
reasonableness of rates and service terms established by Norfolk Southern
Railway Company and Union Pacific Railroad Company for the transportation of
chlorine from McIntosh, Ala., to On
August 22, 2011, the parties jointly filed a motion for protective
order. The proposed protective order, as
set forth in the appendix to this decision, is generally consistent with the
protective orders entered by the Board in recent rate proceedings.[1] It includes provisions governing the
production of highly confidential material and other related provisions
required by Procedures to Expedite Resolution of Rail Rate Challenges to Be
Considered Under the Stand-Alone Cost Methodology, 6 S.T.B. 805,
813-15 (2003). The proposed protective
order stipulates at paragraph 8 that the protected exchange of material will
not be deemed a violation of 49 U.S.C. § 11904. Also at paragraph 8, in order to avoid the
need for routine, unopposed motions to compel the disclosure of confidential
contracts related to the dispute, the protective order specifically provides
for the production of such contracts to enable a more efficient discovery
process. The parties also note that, in
conformity with a recent Order and Memorandum issued by the Federal Railroad
Administration on July 29, 2011, the proposed protective order includes
additional conditions and requirements, at paragraph 3, for the production and
protection from unauthorized disclosure of rail traffic information
constituting or containing Sensitive Security Information. Good
cause exists to grant the request for protective order. The unrestricted disclosure of confidential,
proprietary, or commercially sensitive material could cause serious competitive
injury. Issuance of the requested
protective order will ensure that the material, produced in response to a
discovery request or otherwise, will be used only in connection with this
proceeding and not for any other business or commercial purpose. The motion conforms with
49 C.F.R. § 1104.14 governing requests for protective orders to
maintain confidentiality of materials submitted to the Board, and 49 C.F.R.
§ 1114.21(c) governing protective orders regarding discovery. Accordingly, the request for protective order
will be granted. This action will not significantly affect either the
quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources. It
is ordered: 1. The joint motion for protective order by the
parties is granted. 2. The parties are directed to comply with the
protective order in the appendix to this decision. 3. This decision is effective on its service
date. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings. APPENDIX PROTECTIVE ORDER 1.
Any party producing
information, data, documents, or other material (hereinafter collectively
referred to as “material”) in discovery to another party to this proceeding, or
submitting material in pleadings, that the party in good faith believes
reflects proprietary or confidential information, may designate and stamp such
material as “CONFIDENTIAL,” and such material must be treated as confidential. Such material, any copies, and any data or
notes derived therefrom: (a) Shall be used solely for the purpose of this proceeding and
any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom, and
not for any other business, commercial, or competitive purpose. (b) May be disclosed only to employees, counsel, or agents of the
party requesting such material who have a need to know, handle, or review the
material for purposes of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding
arising herefrom, and only where such employee,
counsel, or agent has been given and has read a copy of this Protective Order,
agrees to be bound by its terms, and executes the attached Undertaking for
Confidential Material prior to receiving access to such materials. (c) Must be destroyed by the requesting party, its employees,
counsel, and agents, at the completion of this proceeding and any judicial
review proceeding arising herefrom. However, counsel and consultants for a party
are permitted to retain file copies of all pleadings which they were authorized
to review under this Protective Order, including Paragraph 10. (d) If contained in any pleading filed with the Board, shall, in
order to be kept confidential, be filed only in pleadings submitted in a
package clearly marked on the outside “Confidential Materials Subject to
Protective Order.” See 49 C.F.R.
§ 1104.14. 2.
Any party producing material
in discovery to another party to this proceeding, or submitting material in
pleadings, may in good faith designate and stamp
particular material, such as material containing shipper-specific rate or cost
data, or other competitively sensitive information, as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.”If
any party wishes to challenge such designation, the party may bring such matter
to the attention of the Board. Material
that is so designated may be disclosed only to outside counsel or outside
consultants of the party requesting such materials who have a need to know,
handle, or review the materials for purposes of this proceeding and any
judicial review proceeding arising herefrom, provided
that such outside counsel or outside consultants have been given and have read
a copy of this Protective Order, agree to be bound by its terms, and execute
the attached Undertaking for Highly Confidential Material prior to receiving
access to such materials. Material
designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” and produced in discovery under this
provision shall be subject to all of the other provisions of this Protective
Order, including without limitation paragraph 1. Nothing in this Protective Order shall
prevent the defendants from agreeing to provide each other with access to
railroad data, information, and documents designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” in
order to provide for and facilitate their joint defense in this proceeding. 3.
Any party producing in discovery
railroad traffic data that has been designated Sensitive Security Information (“SSI”)
by the United States Department of Transportation (“DOT”) or the United States
Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) shall produce such material in
accordance with governing DOT and DHS regulations, rules and policies,
including but not necessarily limited to 49 C.F.R. pts. 15 and 1520,
and the terms and conditions set forth in the FRA Administrator’s
“Authorization to Share Sensitive Security Information (SSI) With Complainants
and Other Parties Involved in Surface Transportation Board (STB) Administrative
Proceedings,” (July 29, 2011), and SSI Order 2011-06-FRA-01 (July 29,
2011).[†] In addition
to other applicable conditions and requirements, rail traffic SSI shall be
produced only to those outside counsel or consultants to a Party who, prior to
production, have (i) reviewed and executed an Undertaking for
Highly Confidential Material; and (ii) reviewed and executed an
“Undertaking for SSI Material.” Executed
copies of Undertakings for Highly Confidential Material and Undertakings for
SSI Material must be provided to the producing party before that SSI material
may be produced to representatives of a requesting Party. 4.
In the event that a party
produces material which should have been designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” and inadvertently fails to designate the material as
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL,” the producing party may notify the other
party in writing within 5 days of discovery of its inadvertent failure to make
the confidentiality designation. The
party who received the material without the confidentiality designation will
return the non-designated portion (including any and all copies) or destroy it,
as directed by the producing party, or take such other steps as the parties
agree to in writing. The producing party
will promptly furnish the receiving party with properly designated material. 5.
In the event that a party
inadvertently produces material that is protected by the attorney-client
privilege, work product doctrine, or any other privilege, the producing party
may make a written request within a reasonable time after the producing party
discovers the inadvertent disclosure that the other party
return the inadvertently produced privileged document. The party who received the inadvertently
produced document will either return the document to the producing party or
destroy the document immediately upon receipt of the written request, as
directed by the producing party. By
returning or destroying the document, the receiving party is not conceding that
the document is privileged and is not waiving its right to later challenge the
substantive privilege claim, provided that it may not challenge the privilege
claim by arguing that the inadvertent production waived the privilege. 6.
If any party intends to use
“CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material at hearings in this
proceeding, or in any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom,
the party so intending shall submit any proposed exhibits or other documents
setting forth or revealing such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
material to the Board, or the court, as appropriate, with a written request
that the Board or the court: (a) restrict
attendance at the hearings during discussion of such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material; and (b) restrict access to the portion of
the record or briefs reflecting discussion of such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material in accordance with the terms of this Protective
Order. 7.
If any party intends to use
“CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material in the course of any
deposition in this proceeding, the party so intending shall so advise counsel
for the party producing the materials, counsel for the deponent, and all other
counsel attending the deposition, and all portions of the deposition at which
any such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material is used shall be
restricted to persons who may review the material under this Protective
Order. All portions of deposition
transcripts and/or exhibits that consist of or disclose “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material shall be kept under seal and treated as
“CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material in accordance with the
terms of this Protective Order. 8.
Each party is ordered to
produce to the other party rail transportation contracts or other documents or
information which, because of confidentiality provisions, cannot be produced
without a Board order directing their production to the extent that (1) the
other party has requested that the documents be produced in discovery, and (2) the
parties agree that the requested documents would be properly discoverable in
this proceeding but for the confidentiality provision(s). Such documents shall be required to be
produced only after the other party(ies) to a
contract (or other document subject to a confidentiality provision) who are
entitled to prior notice have been provided written notice and a reasonable
opportunity to object to that production and obtain a ruling from the Board on
that objection. Any documents or
contracts produced pursuant to this Section 8 shall be treated as “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” and shall otherwise be subject to the terms of this Protective
Order. To the extent that material
reflecting the terms of contracts, shipper-specific traffic data, other traffic
data, or other proprietary information is produced by a party in this or any
related proceedings and is held and used by the receiving person in compliance
with this Protective Order, such production, disclosure, and use of the
material and of the data that the material contains will be deemed essential
for the disposition of this and any related proceedings and will not be deemed
a violation of 49 U.S.C. § 11904. 9.
Except for this proceeding,
the parties agree that if a party is required by law or order of a governmental
or judicial body to release “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material produced
by the other party or copies or notes thereof as to which it obtained access
pursuant to this Protective Order, the party so required shall notify the
producing party in writing within 3 working days of the determination that the
“CONFIDENTIAL” material, “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material, or copies or notes are
to be released, or within 3 working days prior to such release, whichever is
soonest, to permit the producing party the opportunity to contest the release. 10.
Information that is publicly
available or obtained outside of this proceeding from a person with a right to
disclose it publicly shall not be subject to this Protective Order even if the
same information is produced and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” in this proceeding. 11.
Each party has a right to
view its own data, information and documentation (i.e., information originally
generated or compiled by or for that party), even if that data, information and
documentation has been designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” by a producing
party, without securing prior permission from the producing party. If a party or parties (the “filing party or
parties”) file and serve upon another party or parties (the “reviewing party or
parties”) a pleading or evidence containing the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material
of the filing party or parties, the filing party or parties shall also
contemporaneously provide to outside counsel for the reviewing party or parties
a list of the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” information of the filing party or parties
contained in the pleading that must be redacted from the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
version prior to review by the In-house Personnel of the reviewing party or
parties. 12.
Any party filing with the
Board a “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” pleading in this proceeding
should simultaneously file a public version of the pleading. UNDERTAKING CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL I,
_______________________________, have read the Protective Order served on September 6,
2011, governing the production of confidential documents in STB Docket No. NOR
42130, understand the same, and agree to be bound by its terms. I agree not to use or permit the use of any
data or information obtained under this Undertaking, or to use or permit the
use of any techniques disclosed or information learned as a result of receiving
such data or information, for any purposes other than the preparation and
presentation of evidence and argument in STB Docket No. NOR
42130 or any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom. I further agree not to disclose any data or
information obtained under this Protective Order to any person who has not
executed an Undertaking in the form hereof.
At the conclusion of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding
arising herefrom, I will promptly destroy any copies
of such designated documents obtained or made by me or by any outside counsel
or outside consultants working with me, provided, however, that counsel and
consultants may retain copies of pleadings which they were authorized to review
under the Protective Order. I
understand and agree that money damages would not be a sufficient remedy for
breach of this Undertaking and that parties producing confidential documents
shall be entitled to specific performance and injunctive or other equitable
relief as a remedy for any such breach, and I further agree to waive any
requirement for the securing or posting of any bond in connection with such
remedy. Such remedy shall not be deemed
to be the exclusive remedy for breach of this Undertaking but shall be in
addition to all remedies available at law or equity. ___________________________________ Dated:______________________________ UNDERTAKING HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL As outside [ counsel ] [ consultant ] for
_______________________, for which I am acting in this proceeding, I have read
the Protective Order served on September 6, 2011, governing the production
of confidential documents in STB Docket No. NOR 42130, understand the same, and
agree to be bound by its terms. I
further agree not to disclose any data, information or material designated
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” to any person or entity who: (i) is
not eligible for access to “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material under the terms of
the Protective Order, or (ii) has not executed a “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
undertaking in the form hereof. I also
understand and agree, as a condition precedent to my receiving, reviewing, or
using copies of any documents designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL,” that I will
limit my use of those documents and the information they contain to this
proceeding and any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom,
that I will take all necessary steps to assure that said documents and
information will be kept on a confidential basis by any outside counsel or
outside consultants working with me, that under no circumstances will I permit
access to said documents or information by personnel of my client, its
subsidiaries, affiliates, or owners, and that at the conclusion of this
proceeding and any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom,
I will promptly destroy any copies of such designated documents obtained or
made by me or by any outside counsel or outside consultants working with me,
provided, however, that outside counsel and consultants may retain file copies
of pleadings filed with the Board. I
further understand that I must destroy all notes or other documents containing
such highly confidential information in compliance with the terms of the
Protective Order. Under no circumstances
will I permit access to documents designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” by, or
disclose any information contained therein to, any persons or entities for
which I am not acting in this proceeding. I understand and agree that money damages would not be a
sufficient remedy for breach of this Undertaking and that parties producing
confidential documents shall be entitled to specific performance and injunctive
or other equitable relief as a remedy for any such breach, and I further agree
to waive any requirement for the securing or posting of any bond in connection
with such remedy. Such remedy shall not
be deemed to be the exclusive remedy for breach of this Undertaking but shall
be in addition to all remedies available at law or equity. ____________________________________ OUTSIDE
[COUNSEL] [CONSULTANT] Dated: _____________________________ UNDERTAKING HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL SECURITY SENSITIVE INFORMATION AND MATERIAL I
________________________have read FRA Order 2011-06-FRA-01 designating certain
railroad traffic information as Sensitive Security Information (“SSI”) and the
July 29, 2011 memorandum from FRA Administrator Joseph C. Szabo titled “Authorization to Share Sensitive Security
Information (SSI) With Complainants and Other Parties Involved in Surface
Transportation Board (STB) Administrative Proceedings” (hereafter “July 29
Memorandum”). I agree to be bound by the
terms of FRA Order 2011-06-FRA-01 and the July 29 Memorandum for rail
traffic SSI data or information produced in discovery or submitted as evidence
(including evidence or materials derived or compiled from SSI produced in this
proceeding) in STB Docket No. NOR 42130. I have also executed an Undertaking for
Highly Confidential Material, and acknowledge that all SSI produced in this
proceeding is also designated HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL and is subject to all of the requirements and limitations that
apply to HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL material, as well as the additional requirements
set forth in this undertaking. I have been advised and
hereby acknowledge that Norfolk Southern Railway Company’s and Union Pacific
Railroad Company’s conditional disclosure of SSI data or information in STB
Docket No. NOR 42130 pursuant to FRA Order 2011-06-FRA-01 and the July 29 Memorandum
makes me a “covered person” within the meaning of 49 C.F.R.
§§ 15.7(m) and 1520.7 as to any such SSI information I receive, access,
review, and/or use. I understand my
duties and responsibilities as a “covered person” under federal law and applicable
regulations (including but not limited to 49 C.F.R. pts. 15 and
1520), and will comply with those responsibilities. I understand that unauthorized disclosure of
SSI may result in civil penalty or other action. Pursuant to 49 C.F.R. §§ 15.19 and
1520.19, I agree to destroy all SSI data or information in my possession,
custody, or control after the conclusion of STB Docket No. NOR
42130, including the final disposition of any appeals of the STB final decision
in that docket. ______________________________________ OUTSIDE [COUNSEL] [CONSULTANT] TO _________________________ [Party name] Dated: _______________________________ [1] See, e.g., E.I. du Pont de Nemours & Co. v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., NOR 42125 (STB served Jan. 11, 2011); M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. CSX Transp., Inc., NOR 42123 (STB served Aug. 4, 2010); Total Petrochemicals USA, Inc. v. CSX Transp., Inc., NOR 42121 (STB served June 23, 2010). [†] A party producing rail traffic information containing or constituting SSI in discovery or submitting such material in pleadings should also comply with other applicable requirements of DOT and DHS SSI regulations governing the use and handling of SSI, including the SSI marking requirements set forth in 49 C.F.R. § 15.13 or, if that is not practicable, the marking requirements of July 29, 2011 memorandum from Federal Railroad Administration Administrator Joseph C. Szabo titled “Authorization to Share Sensitive Security Information (SSI) With Complainants and Other Parties Involved in Surface Transportation Board (STB) Administrative Proceedings.” | |||