| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | FD_35466_1 | ||
Case Title:   | BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY--TEMPORARY TRACKAGE RIGHTS EXEMPTION--UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Entire Board | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED A PETITION FOR PARTIAL REVOCATION OF THE BOARD-APPROVED TRACKAGE RIGHTS CLASS EXEMPTION TO PERMIT BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY LOCAL TRACKAGE RIGHTS OVER CERTAIN LINES OF UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY TO EXPIRE AT MIDNIGHT ON DECEMBER 10, 2011, AS AGREED BY THE PARTIES. DISCONTINUANCE OF THE TRACKAGE RIGHTS OPERATIONS ARE SUBJECT TO STANDARD LABOR PROTECTIVE CONDITIONS. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 12 KB 22 KB 31 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 31 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
41428 SERVICE DATE – APRIL 5, 2011 EB SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. FD 35466 (Sub-No. 1) BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY –TEMPORARY TRACKAGE RIGHTS EXEMPTION– UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY Decided: March 30, 2011 Digest:[1] This decision grants partial revocation of a Board-approved exemption to permit rights granted by one railroad to another railroad to operate over certain of its lines to expire at midnight on December 10, 2011. By petition filed on February 8, 2011,
BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) requests that the Board partially revoke the class
exemption to permit the trackage
rights arrangement exempted in Docket No. FD 35466[2]
to expire at midnight on December 10, 2011.
BNSF
states that the trackage rights arrangement exempted
in Docket No. FD 35466 is necessary to permit BNSF to move empty and loaded
ballast trains to and from the ballast pit at Elsey,
Cal., which is adjacent to the UP rail line, for use in the maintenance of
BNSF’s tracks. But BNSF is only seeking,
and UP is only willing to grant, temporary operating rights over UP’s trackage until midnight on December 10, 2011. DISCUSSION
AND CONCLUSION Although BNSF and UP have
expressly agreed on the duration of the proposed temporary trackage
rights arrangement, trackage rights approved under
the class exemption at 49 C.F.R. § 1180.2(d)(7) typically
remain effective indefinitely, regardless of any contract provisions. Occasionally, trackage
rights exemptions have been granted for a limited time period rather than in
perpetuity. See Union Pac. R.R.–Trackage Rights Exemption–The Burlington N. and Santa Fe Ry.,
FD 34242 (Sub-No. 1) (STB served Oct. 7, 2002). Under 49
U.S.C. § 10502, the Board may exempt a person, class of persons, or a
transaction or service, in whole or in part, when it finds that: (1) continued regulation is not necessary to
carry out the rail transportation policy of 49 U.S.C. § 10101; and (2) either
the transaction or service is of limited scope, or regulation is not necessary
to protect shippers from the abuse of market power. BNSF’s
temporary trackage rights already have been
authorized under the class exemption at 49 C.F.R. § 1180.2(d)(7). See R.R. Consolidation Procedures,
1 I.C.C.2d 270 (1985). Granting partial
revocation in these circumstances will promote the rail transportation policy
by eliminating the need to file a second pleading seeking discontinuance when
the arrangement expires, thereby promoting rail transportation policy goals at
49 U.S.C. § 10101(2), (4), (5), (7), and (15).
Moreover, limiting the term of the trackage
rights is consistent with the limited scope of the transaction previously
exempted and will have no adverse impact on shippers on the line because the trackage rights that are the subject of the exemption are
solely for the movement of empty and loaded ballast trains for use in the
maintenance of BNSF’s tracks. Therefore,
we will grant the petition and permit the trackage
rights exempted in Docket No. FD 35466 to expire at midnight
on December 10, 2011. In
order to provide the statutorily mandated protection to any employee adversely
affected by the discontinuance of trackage rights, we
will impose the employee protective conditions set forth in Oregon
Short Line Railroad–Abandonment Portion Goshen Branch Between Firth & Ammon, in Bingham & Bonneville Counties, Idaho, 360
I.C.C. 91 (1979). This
action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human
environment or the conservation of energy resources. It is ordered: 1.
The petition for partial revocation is granted. 2.
Under 49 U.S.C. § 10502, the trackage rights
described in Docket No. FD 35466 are exempted, as discussed above, to
permit the trackage rights to expire at midnight on
December 10, 2011, subject to the employee protective conditions set forth
in Oregon Short Line Railroad–Abandonment Portion Goshen Branch
Between Firth & Ammon, in Bingham & Bonneville
Counties, Idaho, 360 I.C.C. 91 (1979). 3.
Notice will be published in the Federal Register on April 5, 2011. 4. This decision is effective on May 5,
2011. Petitions to stay must be filed by
April 15, 2011. Petitions for
reconsideration must be filed by April 25, 2011. By the Board, Chairman Elliott and
Commissioner Mulvey. [1] The digest constitutes no part of the decision of the Board but has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It may not be cited to or relied upon as precedent. Policy Statement on Plain Language Digests in Decisions, EP 696 (STB served Sept. 2, 2010). [2] In that
docket, on February 8, 2011, BNSF filed a verified notice of exemption under
the Board’s class exemption procedures at 49 C.F.R. § 1180.2(d)(7). The notice
covered the agreement by Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) to grant local trackage rights to BNSF over UP’s lines extending between: (1) UP milepost 93.2 at Stockton, Cal., on
UP’s Oakland Subdivision, and UP milepost 219.4 at Elsey,
Cal., on UP’s Canyon Subdivision, a distance of approximately 126.2 miles; and
(2) UP milepost 219.4 at Elsey, Cal., and UP milepost
280.7 at Keddie, Cal., on UP’s Canyon Subdivision, a
distance of 61.3 miles. BNSF states that
the trackage rights are only temporary rights, but,
because they are “local” rather than “overhead” rights, they do not qualify for
the Board’s class exemption for temporary trackage
rights at 49 C.F.R. § 1180.2(d)(8).
See BNSF Ry.–Temporary Trackage
Rights Exemption–Union Pac. R.R., FD 35466 (STB served Feb. 24, 2011). | |||