| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | NOR_41191_1 | ||
Case Title:   | AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY V. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED THE REQUEST OF AEP TEXAS NORTH COMPANY TO DISMISS ITS COMPLAINT AGAINST BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY WITH PREJUDICE. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 18 KB 19 KB 40 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 36 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
41960 SERVICE DATE -
OCTOBER 26, 2011 DO Surface transportation
board Decision Docket No. NOR 41191 (Sub-No. 1) Aep Texas North Company v. BNSF Railway Company Decided:
October 25, 2011 This decision grants the request of
AEP Texas North Company (AEP Texas) to dismiss its complaint against BNSF
Railway Company (BNSF) with prejudice. AEP Texas challenged the reasonableness of
rates charged by BNSF to transport coal from mine origins in the Powder River
Basin of Wyoming to the Oklaunion Generating Station
near Vernon, Tex. In a decision served
September 10, 2007, the Board determined that AEP Texas had failed to show that
the rates were unreasonable. Both
parties petitioned the Board for reconsideration. AEP Texas sought reconsideration of, among
other things, the Board’s previously published
cost-of-capital findings for the railroad industry as applied in this rate
case. In a decision served on May 15,
2009, the Board reaffirmed its use of the cost-of-capital figures and found
that the challenged rates still had not been shown to be unreasonable. AEP Texas appealed this decision to the
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, which vacated the
Board’s decision, in part, and remanded to the Board to reassess the “decisionmaking for the 2005 cost of equity estimate.” AEP Tex. N. Co. v. STB, 609 F.3d 432, 444 (D.C. Cir. 2010). On October 19, 2011, AEP Texas filed a petition
to dismiss with prejudice its complaint against BNSF, stating that the parties
have reached a voluntary settlement on all matters at issue in this proceeding. AEP Texas’s petition will be granted, and
this proceeding will be discontinued. This decision will not significantly affect
the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources. It is ordered: 1. AEP Texas’s petition is granted. The complaint is dismissed with prejudice,
and this proceeding is discontinued. 2.
This decision is effective on its service date. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Office of Proceedings. | |||