| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | NOR_42127_0 | ||
Case Title:   | INTERMOUNTAIN POWER AGENCY v. UNION PACIFIC RIALROAD COMPANY | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION ESTABLISHES A PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE AND PROTECTIVE ORDER FOR THIS PROCEEDING. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 25 KB 65 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 67 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
41352 SERVICE
DATE – JANUARY 27, 2011 DO SURFACE
TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. NOR 42127 INTERMOUNTAIN
POWER AGENCY v. UNION
PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY REQUEST FOR
PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE AND PROTECTIVE ORDER Decided: January 26, 2011 This decision establishes a procedural schedule and
a protective order for this proceeding. Intermountain Power Agency (IPA) challenges the
reasonableness of rates established by Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP) for unit train coal transportation service to IPA’s
electric generating facilities at Lynndyl, Utah. IPA alleges that UP possesses market dominance
over the traffic and requests that maximum reasonable rates be prescribed
pursuant to the Board’s Stand-Alone Cost test.
IPA also alleges that UP’s failure to disclose its rates within 10
business days of when IPA requested them was an unreasonable practice. On January 6, 2011, IPA and UP
jointly filed a report on their conference held pursuant to 49 C.F.R. § 1111.10(b). The report contains a proposed procedural
schedule and a stipulated protective order.
The parties request the following procedural schedule: Discovery Completed April
13, 2011 Complainant Files Opening Evidence July 13, 2011 Defendant Files Reply Evidence October
11, 2011 Complainant Files Rebuttal Evidence December
2, 2011 Parties File Closing Briefs January 18, 2012 The parties’ jointly proposed procedural schedule
will be adopted for this proceeding. The parties are reminded that they may
request a staff-supervised discovery conference. In an effort to maintain the procedural
schedule that will be adopted here, the parties are encouraged to request such
a conference at least 60 days prior to the end of the scheduled discovery
period. The
stipulated protective order, as set forth in the appendix to this decision, is
consistent with the protective orders entered by the Board in recent rate
proceedings.[1] It includes provisions governing the
production of highly confidential material and other related provisions
required by Procedures to Expedite Resolution of Rail Rate Challenges to Be
Considered Under the Stand-Alone Cost Methodology, 6 S.T.B. 805,
813-15 (2003). The protective order also
stipulates (at paragraph 7) that the protected exchange of material will not be
deemed a violation of 49 U.S.C. § 11904. Also at paragraph 7, in order to avoid the
need for routine, unopposed motions to compel the disclosure of confidential
contracts related to the dispute, the protective order specifically provides
for the production of such contracts to enable a more efficient discovery
process. Good cause exists to grant the
request for protective order.[2] The unrestricted disclosure of confidential,
proprietary, or commercially sensitive material could cause serious competitive
injury. Issuance of the requested
protective order will ensure that the material, produced in response to a
discovery request or otherwise, will be used only in connection with this proceeding
and not for any other business or commercial purpose. Accordingly, the request for protective order
will be granted. This decision will not
significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the
conservation of energy resources. It
is ordered: 1. The
parties’ proposed procedural schedule is adopted for this proceeding. 2.
The parties’ proposed protective order is adopted for this proceeding. 3.
The parties are directed to comply with the protective order in the
appendix to this decision. 4. This decision is effective on its service
date. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings. APPENDIX PROTECTIVE ORDER 1. Any party producing information, data, documents, or other
material (hereinafter collectively referred to as “material”) in discovery to
another party to this proceeding, or submitting material in pleadings, that the
party in good faith believes reflects proprietary or confidential information,
may designate and stamp such material as “CONFIDENTIAL,” and such material must
be treated as confidential. Such
material, any copies, and any data or notes derived therefrom: (a) Shall be used solely for the purpose of this proceeding and
any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom, and
not for any other business, commercial, or competitive purpose. (b) May be disclosed only to employees, counsel, or agents of
the party requesting such material who have a need to know, handle, or review
the material for purposes of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding
arising herefrom, and only where such employee,
counsel, or agent has been given and has read a copy of this Protective Order,
agrees to be bound by its terms, and executes the attached Undertaking for
Confidential Material prior to receiving access to such materials. (c) Must be destroyed by the requesting party, its employees,
counsel, and agents, at the completion of this proceeding and any judicial
review proceeding arising herefrom. However, counsel and consultants for a party
are permitted to retain file copies of all pleadings which they were authorized
to review under this Protective Order, including Paragraph 10. (d) If contained in any pleading filed with the Board shall, in
order to be kept confidential, be filed only in pleadings submitted in a
package clearly marked on the outside “Confidential Materials Subject to
Protective Order.” See 49 C.F.R. §
1104.14. 2. Any party producing material in
discovery to another party to this proceeding, or submitting material in
pleadings, may in good faith designate and stamp
particular material, such as material containing shipper-specific rate or cost
data or other competitively sensitive information, as “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL.” If any party wishes to
challenge such designation, the party may bring such matter to the attention of
the Board. Material that is so designated
may be disclosed only to outside counsel or outside consultants of the party
requesting such materials who have a need to know, handle, or review the
materials for purposes of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding
arising herefrom, provided that such outside counsel
or outside consultants have been given and have read a copy of this Protective
Order, agree to be bound by its terms, and execute the attached Undertaking for
Highly Confidential Material prior to receiving access to such materials. Material designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
and produced in discovery under this provision shall be subject to all of the
other provisions of this Protective Order, including without limitation
paragraph 1. 3. In the event that a party produces
material which should have been designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
and inadvertently fails to designate the material as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL,” the producing party may notify the other party in writing within
5 days of discovery of its inadvertent failure to make the confidentiality
designation. The party who received the
material without the confidentiality designation will return the non-designated
portion (including any and all copies) or destroy it, as directed by the
producing party, or take such other steps as the parties agree to in writing. The producing party will promptly furnish the
receiving party with properly designated material. 4. In the event that a party
inadvertently produces material that is protected by the attorney-client
privilege, work product doctrine, or any other privilege, the producing party
may make a written request within a reasonable time after the producing party
discovers the inadvertent disclosure that the other party
return the inadvertently produced privileged document. The party who received the inadvertently
produced document will either return the document to the producing party or
destroy the document immediately upon receipt of the written request, as
directed by the producing party. By
returning or destroying the document, the receiving party is not conceding that
the document is privileged and is not waiving its right to later challenge the
substantive privilege claim, provided that it may not challenge the privilege
claim by arguing that the inadvertent production waived the privilege. 5. If any party intends to use
“CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material at hearings in this
proceeding, or in any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom,
the party so intending shall submit any proposed exhibits or other documents
setting forth or revealing such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
material to the Board, or the court, as appropriate, with a written request
that the Board or the court: (a)
restrict attendance at the hearings during discussion of such “CONFIDENTIAL”
and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material; and (b) restrict access to the portion
of the record or briefs reflecting discussion of such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material in accordance with the terms of this Protective
Order. 6. If any party intends to use
“CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material in the course of any
deposition in this proceeding, the party so intending shall so advise counsel
for the party producing the materials, counsel for the deponent, and all other
counsel attending the deposition, and all portions of the deposition at which
any such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material is used shall be
restricted to persons who may review the material under this Protective
Order. All portions of deposition transcripts
and/or exhibits that consist of or disclose “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material shall be kept under seal and treated as “CONFIDENTIAL”
and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material in accordance with the terms of this
Protective Order. 7. Each party is ordered to produce
to the other party rail transportation contracts or other documents or
information which, because of confidentiality provisions, cannot be produced
without a Board order directing their production to the extent that (1) the
other party has requested that the contracts be produced in discovery, and
(2) the parties agree that the requested contracts would be properly
discoverable in this proceeding but for the confidentiality provision(s). Such documents shall be required to be
produced only after the other party(ies) to a
contract (or other document subject to a confidentiality provision) who are
entitled to prior notice have been provided written notice and a reasonable
opportunity to object to that production and obtain a ruling from the Board on
that objection. Any documents or
contracts produced pursuant to this Section 7 shall be treated as “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” and shall otherwise be subject to the terms of this Protective
Order. To the extent that material
reflecting the terms of contracts, shipper-specific traffic data, other traffic
data, or other proprietary information is produced by a party in this or any
related proceedings and is held and used by the receiving person in compliance
with this Protective Order, such production, disclosure, and use of the
material and of the data that the material contains will be deemed essential
for the disposition of this and any related proceedings and will not be deemed
a violation of 49 U.S.C. § 11904. 8. Except for this proceeding, the
parties agree that if a party is required by law or order of a governmental or
judicial body to release “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material
produced by the other party or copies or notes thereof as to which it obtained
access pursuant to this Protective Order, the party so required shall notify
the producing party in writing within 3 working days of the determination that
the “CONFIDENTIAL” material, “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material, or copies or notes
are to be released, or within 3 working days prior to such release, whichever
is soonest, to permit the producing party the opportunity to contest the
release. 9. Information that is publicly
available or obtained outside of this proceeding from a person with a right to
disclose it shall not be subject to this Protective Order even if the same
information is produced and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” in this proceeding. 10. Each party has a right to view its
own data, information and documentation (i.e., information originally generated
or compiled by or for that party), even if that data, information and
documentation has been designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” by a producing
party, without securing prior permission from the producing party. If a party (the “filing party”) files and
serves upon the other party (the “reviewing party”) a pleading or evidence
containing the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material of the filing party, the filing
party shall also contemporaneously provide to outside counsel for the reviewing
party a list of the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” information of the filing party
contained in the pleading that must be redacted from the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
version prior to review by the In-house Personnel of the reviewing party. 11. Any party filing with the Board a
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” pleading in this proceeding should
simultaneously file a public version of the pleading. UNDERTAKING CONFIDENTIAL
MATERIAL I,
_______________________________, have read the Protective Order served on January
27, 2011, governing the production of confidential
documents in STB Docket No. 42127, understand the same, and agree to be
bound by its terms. I agree not to use
or permit the use of any data or information obtained under this Undertaking,
or to use or permit the use of any techniques disclosed or information learned
as a result of receiving such data or information, for any purposes other than
the preparation and presentation of evidence and argument in STB Docket No.
42127 or any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom. I further agree not to disclose any data or
information obtained under this Protective Order to any person who has not
executed an Undertaking in the form hereof.
At the conclusion of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding
arising herefrom, I will promptly destroy any copies
of such designated documents obtained or made by me or by any outside counsel
or outside consultants working with me, provided, however, that counsel may
retain copies of pleadings which they were authorized to review under the
Protective Order. I understand and agree that money damages would not be a
sufficient remedy for breach of this Undertaking and that parties producing
confidential documents shall be entitled to specific performance and injunctive
or other equitable relief as a remedy for any such breach, and I further agree
to waive any requirement for the securing or posting of any bond in connection
with such remedy. Such remedy shall not
be deemed to be the exclusive remedy for breach of this Undertaking but shall
be in addition to all remedies available at law or equity. __________________________________ Dated:
____________________________ UNDERTAKING HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL As outside [counsel] [consultant]
for _______________________________, for which I am acting in this proceeding,
I have read the Protective Order served on January 27, 2011, governing the production of confidential documents in STB
Docket No. 42127, understand the same, and agree to be bound by its
terms. I further agree not to disclose
any data, information or material designated
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” to any person or entity who: (i) is not eligible
for access to “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material under the terms of the Protective
Order, or (ii) has not executed a “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” undertaking in the
form hereof. I also understand and
agree, as a condition precedent to my receiving, reviewing, or using copies of
any documents designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL,” that I will limit my use of
those documents and the information they contain to this proceeding and any
judicial review proceeding arising herefrom, that I
will take all necessary steps to assure that said documents and information
will be kept on a confidential basis by any outside counsel or outside
consultants working with me, that under no circumstances will I permit access
to said documents or information by personnel of my client, its subsidiaries,
affiliates, or owners, and that at the conclusion of this proceeding and any
judicial review proceeding arising herefrom, I will
promptly destroy any copies of such designated documents obtained or made by me
or by any outside counsel or outside consultants working with me, provided,
however, that outside counsel and consultants may retain file copies of
pleadings filed with the Board. I
further understand that I must destroy all notes or other documents containing
such highly confidential information in compliance with the terms of the Protective
Order. Under no circumstances will I
permit access to documents designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” by, or disclose any
information contained therein to, any persons or entities for which I am not
acting in this proceeding. I understand and agree that money damages would not be a
sufficient remedy for breach of this Undertaking and that parties producing
confidential documents shall be entitled to specific performance and injunctive
or other equitable relief as a remedy for any such breach, and I further agree
to waive any requirement for the securing or posting of any bond in connection
with such remedy. Such remedy shall not
be deemed to be the exclusive remedy for breach of this Undertaking but shall
be in addition to all remedies available at law or equity. ____________________________________ OUTSIDE
[COUNSELCONSULTANT] Dated: ______________________________ [1] See, e.g., E.I. DuPont de Nemours
& Co. v. Norfolk S. Ry., NOR 42125 (STB served Jan. 11,
2011); M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. CSX Transp., Inc., NOR 42123
(STB served Aug. 4, 2010); Total Petrochemicals USA, Inc. v. CSX
Transp., Inc., NOR 42121 (STB served June 23, 2010); US
Magnesium, L.L.C. v. Union Pac. R.R., NOR 42116 (STB served
Dec. 16, 2009). | |||