| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | FD_35571_0 | ||
Case Title:   | AMTRAK PETITION FOR DETERMINATION OF PRIIA SECTION 209 COST METHODOLOGY | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION DIRECTED AMTRAK TO SERVE A PETITION AND ITS SUPPLEMENTS ON THE SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION AND THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA NO LATER THAN DECEMBER 20, 2011. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 27 KB 21 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 22 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
42075 SERVICE
DATE – DECEMBER 15, 2011 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. FD 35571 AMTRAK PETITION FOR DETERMINATION
OF PRIIA SECTION 209 COST METHODOLOGY Decided: December 15, 2011 Pursuant to Section 209 of the
Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act of 2008 (PRIIA),[1]
the National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Amtrak) must develop and implement
a single, nationwide standardized methodology for establishing and allocating the
operating and capital costs among the States and Amtrak in connection with the
operation of certain Amtrak routes. PRIIA
Sec. 209(a). In
developing and implementing this methodology, Amtrak must consult with the
Secretary of Transportation, the governors of each relevant State, and the Mayor
of the District of Columbia (or their representatives). Id.
If Amtrak and the States (including the District of Columbia) in which
Amtrak operates these routes do not voluntarily adopt and implement a
methodology, then the Board must determine the appropriate methodology. PRIIA Section 209(c). In a petition filed with the Board on
November 21, 2011, and in supplemental filings made on November 23, December 5,
and December 6, 2011, Amtrak indicates that among 19 “Covered States,”[2]
18 of them have formally agreed to adopt its proposed methodology. One state, Indiana, has declined to adopt the
methodology. As a result, Amtrak requests
that pursuant to PRIIA Section 209(c) and 49 C.F.R. § 1117.1, the Board: (1) determine that the methodology developed jointly
by Amtrak and various States, establishing and allocating costs for
state-supported Amtrak routes (Agreed Methodology), is the appropriate
methodology under Section 209; and (2) require the full implementation of
the Agreed Methodology pursuant to Section 209(c). Amtrak served its petition and
supplements on the 19 “Covered States” because they have an interest in this
matter. Given that the Secretary of
Transportation and the District of Columbia are also named in Section 209, the
Board believes it is prudent that they be notified of the petition and
supplements. Amtrak is therefore directed
– no later than December 20, 2011 – to serve the petition and supplements on
the Secretary of Transportation and the District of Columbia, and
contemporaneously to certify to the Board that it has done so. Those parties will have 20 days from the date
of service to reply, if they choose to do so. The appropriateness of the methodology
will be addressed by the Board in a later decision. This action will not significantly
affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation
of energy resources. It is ordered:
1.
Amtrak is directed – no later than December 20, 2011 – to serve the
petition and supplements on the Secretary of Transportation and the District of
Columbia, and contemporaneously to certify to the Board that it has done
so. Those parties will have 20 days from
the date of service to reply, if they choose to do so. 2. This
decision is effective on the date of service. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings. [1] P.L. 110-432, Div. B, Title II, § 209,
codified at 49 U.S.C. § 24101 note. [2] See Pet., Johnson Decl., ¶4 (listing
Covered States: California, Connecticut,
Illinois, Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Missouri, New Hampshire, New
York, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Texas, Vermont, Virginia,
Washington, and Wisconsin). | |||