SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT
    Decision Information

Docket Number:  
FD_35516_0

Case Title:  
CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.-TRACKAGE RIGHTS EXEMPTION-NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Decision Type:  
Decision

Deciding Body:  
Director Of Proceedings

    Decision Summary

Decision Notes:  
DECISION: (1) REJECTED A NOTICE OF EXEMPTION FILED BY NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY (NSR); AND (2) DETERMINED THAT NSR'S MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER FILED IN THIS PROCEEDING IS MOOT.

    Decision Attachments

11 KB
23 KB

Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 16 Seconds

Note:
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com.

    Full Text of Decision

35729

41677 SERVICE DATE – LATE RELEASE JUNE 14, 2011

DO

 

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

 

DECISION

 

Docket No. FD 35516

 

CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.—TRACKAGE RIGHTS EXEMPTION—NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

 

Decided: June 14, 2011

 

On May 16, 2011, Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSR) filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 U.S.C. 10502 and 49 C.F.R. 1180.2(d)(7) to permit CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT) to acquire from NSR nonexclusive local trackage rights over approximately 11.6 miles of NSR’s line of railroad between milepost WG 12.0 near Helen, W. Va., and milepost WG 23.6 at Pemberton, W.Va. (the Line).[1]

 

The notice indicates that CSXT currently leases 13.5 miles of rail line between milepost WG 12.0 near Helen, W. Va., and milepost WG 25.5 at McVey, W. Va., which includes the Line. See CSX Transp., Inc.—Lease and Operation Exemption—Norfolk & W. Ry., FD 32768 (ICC served Oct. 27, 1995). According to NSR, it may terminate the lease on 30 days’ notice, provided that NSR offers CSXT trackage rights or another appropriate agreement granting CSXT continuing rights to operate over the Line with its own trains and crews.[2] The notice indicates that NSR has elected to terminate the lease and has offered CSXT a draft trackage rights agreement that would govern CSXT’s continued provision of common carrier service over the Line. It further states that NSR “understands” that its notice will “convert CSXT's leasehold interest in the Line to a local trackage rights tenancy, thereby enabling CSXT to continue to provide common carrier service over the Line.” Notice at 6 n.4.

 

The notice of exemption will be rejected because the circumstances here are not appropriate for consideration under the abbreviated class exemption procedures of 49 C.F.R.  1180.4(g). First, NSR states that the notice is filed “on behalf of the parties hereto,” Notice at 4, which presumably means on behalf of NSR and CSXT, the entities identified in the notice as parties to the transaction. There is no indication, however, that CSXT has authorized NSR to act on its behalf. That alone is a sufficient basis to reject the notice. Cf. Single—Continuance In Control Exemption—Charlotte S. R.R., FD 35253 (STB served Mar. 4, 2011) (rejecting a notice filed purportedly on behalf of a number of petitioners, one of whom did not consent to or know about the filing before it was made). Additionally, it is at least unusual, if not unprecedented, for the grantor of trackage rights to file such a notice, as it is not the grant but the acquisition of trackage rights that requires Board authorization. See 49 U.S.C. 11323(a)(6); cf. 49 U.S.C. 11324(a) (the Board may begin a proceeding to authorize the acquisition of trackage rights “on application of the person seeking the authority”). NSR cites no authority for the proposition that a trackage rights grantor may use the notice of exemption process to seek trackage rights authority for a third party, absent any indication that the grantee consents to such a filing on its behalf. Moreover, NSR cites no authority for the proposition that the filing of a notice can automatically “convert” a third party’s operating authority from one form to another, as NSR seeks to do here.

 

Because NSR’s notice will be rejected, the motion for protective order is moot.

 

This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources.

 

It is ordered:

 

1. NSR’s notice of exemption is rejected.

 

2. NSR’s motion for protective order is moot.

 

3. This decision is effective on the date of service.

By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings.



[1] A redacted version of the trackage rights agreement between NSR and CSXT was filed with the notice of exemption. NSR concurrently filed the unredacted version of the agreement under seal along with a motion for protective order.

[2] NSR states that this lease provision only requires that trackage rights or a suitable alternative be offered with respect to the Line itself, not the additional 1.9 miles between milepost WG 23.6 at Pemberton and milepost WG 25.5 at McVey included in the lease. The notice states that “NSR anticipates that CSXT will proceed under a separate docket to obtain authority to terminate its common carrier status between Pemberton and McVey in keeping with its obligation under the Lease.”