| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | FD_35622_0 | ||
Case Title:   | STEELRIVER INFRASTRUCTURE PARTNERS LP, STEELRIVER INFRASTRUCTURE ASSOCIATES LLC, STEELRIVER INFRASTRUCTURE FUND NORTH AMERICA LP AND PATRIOT FUNDING LLC--CONTROL EXEMPTION--PATRIOT RAIL CORP., ET AL. | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Chairman | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTS A MOTION TO MODIFY THE PROTECTIVE ORDER TO INCLUDE PROTECTION FOR DOCUMENTS CLASSIFIED "HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL" IN THIS PROCEEDING. IN ADDITION, THE DECISION STAYED THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THE NOTICE OF EXEMPTION IN THIS PROCEEDING UNTIL JUNE 16, 2012. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 32 KB 51 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 39 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
42421 SERVICE DATE – LATE
RELEASE MAY 25, 2012 CO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. FD 35622 SteelRiver Infrastructure
Partners LP, SteelRiver Infrastructure Associates LLC, SteelRiver
Infrastructure Fund North America LP, and Patriot Funding LLC—Control
Exemption— Patriot Rail Corp., et al. Decided:
May 25, 2012 By motion filed May 7, 2012, SteelRiver Infrastructure Partners LP, SteelRiver
Infrastructure Associates LLC, SteelRiver Infrastructure Fund North America LP,
and Patriot Funding LLC (collectively, SteelRiver) sought a protective order pursuant to
49 C.F.R. § 1104.14(b) to protect the confidential and commercially
sensitive information contained in the unredacted Stock Purchase Agreement
(SPA) dated May 4, 2012, among SteelRiver and Patriot Rail Holdings
LLC. With the motion, SteelRiver
included a proposed protective order and undertaking. Concurrently, SteelRiver filed a verified notice of exemption under 49 C.F.R. § 1180.2(d)(2) to acquire control of Patriot Rail Corp. (Patriot) and its rail carrier subsidiaries.[1] SteelRiver filed a redacted public version of
the SPA with its notice, as well as an unredacted version of the SPA under seal. On May 18, 2012, Sierra Railroad Company and Sierra Northern Railway (SERA) (collectively, Sierra) filed a motion for access to the unredacted SPA filed under seal by SteelRiver. Sierra expressed concern that Patriot may be misusing the Board’s exemption procedures to preclude effective review by any legal authority (namely, the Board and the federal court in California adjudicating a dispute between Sierra and Patriot) of the impact of alleged anticompetitive conduct on SERA’s common carrier rights to operate over certain rail facilities in California.[2] Sierra asserts that access to the unredacted SPA is necessary to determine whether its concerns are justified and, if so, whether to seek to stay or revoke the exemption. By decision served on May 18, 2012, the Board granted
a protective order in this proceeding. That
protective order, consistent with SteelRiver’s original request, designates a
single category of “Confidential” information.
The Board indicated that Sierra may access the SPA pursuant to the terms
of the protective order and undertaking adopted in its decision. By motion filed on May 21, 2012, SteelRiver and Patriot now ask the Board to modify the
protective order to include protection for documents classified “Highly
Confidential” and to permit the reclassification of the unredacted SPA as
Highly Confidential.[3] Under the proposed protective order, “Highly
Confidential” materials could only be accessed by outside STB counsel and
consultants that have executed an undertaking.
SteelRiver
and Patriot submit that the modified protective order would facilitate the
potential exchange and use of commercially sensitive information. On
May 22, 2012, Sierra filed a reply in opposition to this motion, arguing that
the restrictions proposed by SteelRiver and Patriot would prevent Sierra from
obtaining informed advice from counsel regarding the position Sierra should
take on the proposed acquisition of control.
Specifically, Sierra requests that its outside
counsel in the federal court action have access to the SPA so that they can
better understand the impact of the proposed acquisition on Sierra’s rights in
the federal court action. Sierra further
requests that its inside counsel and Sierra’s
executive management personnel have access to the SPA so that they can better assess
the impact of the proposed acquisition on Sierra’s rights as a competitor to
one of Patriot’s rail carrier subsidiaries.
Sierra also proposes that the Board establish a procedure, including a
Board-sponsored technical conference, that would
enable parties jointly to determine the proper classification of the redacted
SPA materials as either “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” information. In a
letter submitted on May 23, 2012, SteelRiver and Patriot request that the Board
deny the relief sought by Sierra.
SteelRiver and Patriot state that they offered to provide a less
redacted version of the SPA to Sierra’s management, other counsel, and outside
counsel and consultants upon execution of the undertaking required by the Board’s
decision served May 18, 2012. SteelRiver
and Patriot indicate that Sierra has rejected this offer. On May 24, 2012, Sierra replied to SteelRiver’s
and Patriot’s letter. Good cause exists to grant SteelRiver’s and
Patriot’s motion to modify the protective order to include protection for documents classified “Highly
Confidential.” The Board has routinely allowed parties to
protect competitively sensitive or proprietary information by designating
material as “Highly Confidential.”[4] Therefore, the Board will adopt the new
protective order (Revised Protective Order) and undertakings submitted by
SteelRiver and Patriot, as modified to conform to the standard language
typically used regarding information designated as “Highly Confidential.”[5] No party has provided good reason for the
Board to depart from that standard approach.
In accordance with the terms of the protective order, designated
material, whether “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential,” may be used solely
for this proceeding and not for other purposes. The SPA shall be subject to the protective
order and undertakings, as modified, in the Appendix to this decision, which
will supersede the protective order served on May 18, 2012. Further, in accordance with the terms of the Revised
Protective Order (paragraph 6), any party
to this proceeding may challenge the designation of information or documents as
“Confidential” or as “Highly Confidential” by filing a motion with the
Board. In light of this provision, we will not
schedule a technical conference to determine the status of the designated
information. Instead, the parties are
encouraged to work together to resolve their differences regarding designation. If the parties are unable to do so, one or
both parties may file a motion pursuant to paragraph 6 of the Revised
Protective Order. If such a matter needs
to be resolved prior to the filing of any petitions for stay in this case, the appropriate
party shall file a motion with the Board by May 30, 2012, in order to
provide the Board with sufficient time to fully consider any issues presented. Any reply will be due by May 31, 2012. To permit sufficient time for the Board to
rule on any motion regarding the confidentiality designation of the SPA and permit
sufficient time thereafter for Sierra to prepare and file a stay petition if it
chooses to do so, a housekeeping stay of the effective date of SteelRiver’s
notice of exemption will be imposed until June 16, 2012. The deadline for filing petitions to stay the
proceeding beyond that date will be extended to June 8, 2012. This
action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human
environment or the conservation of energy resources. It is ordered: 1. The motion to modify the protective order is
granted, to the extent discussed above. The Revised Protective Order and Undertakings
in the Appendix to this decision are adopted and replace the protective order
and undertaking served May 18, 2012. 2. The unredacted SPA submitted in this
proceeding will be kept under seal by the Board and will not be placed in the
public docket or otherwise disclosed to the public, unless the undertakings are
executed and the terms of the protective order are followed, or unless
otherwise ordered by the Board. 3. As discussed above, motions to challenge the
designation of material as “Confidential” or “Highly Confidential” are due by
May 30, 2012. Any replies will be due by
May 31, 2012. 4. The effective date of SteelRiver’s notice of
exemption is stayed until June 16, 2012.
5. Petitions to further stay this
proceeding are due by June 8, 2012. 6. This decision is effective on its service
date. By the Board, Chairman Daniel R. Elliott. APPENDIX PROTECTIVE ORDER 1. For purposes of this Protective Order: (a) “Confidential Documents” means documents and other tangible
materials containing or reflecting Confidential Information. (b) “Confidential Information” means traffic data (including but
not limited to waybills, abstracts, study movement sheets, and any documents or
computer tapes containing data derived from waybills, abstracts, study movement
sheets, or other data bases, and cost work papers), the identification of
shippers and receivers in conjunction with shipper-specific or other traffic
data, the confidential terms of contracts with shippers, or carriers,
confidential financial and cost data, and other confidential or proprietary
business or personal information. (c) “Designated Material” means any documents designated or
stamped as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” in accordance with Paragraph
2 or 3 of this Protective Order, and any Confidential Information contained in
such materials. (d) “Proceedings” means those before the Surface Transportation
Board (“Board”) concerning the Notice of Exemption filed in Docket No. FD 35622
and any related proceedings before the Board, and any judicial review
proceedings arising from Docket No. FD 35622 or from any
related proceedings before the Board. 2. If any party to these Proceedings determines
that any part of a document it submits, discovery request it propounds, or a
discovery response it produces, or a transcript of a deposition or hearing in
which it participates, or of a pleading or other paper to be submitted, filed
or served in these Proceedings contains Confidential Information or consists of
Confidential Documents, then that party may designate and stamp such
Confidential Information and Confidential Documents as “CONFIDENTIAL.” Any
information or documents designated or stamped as “CONFIDENTIAL” shall be
handled as provided for hereinafter. 3. If any party to these Proceedings determines
that any part of a document it submits, discovery request it propounds, or a
discovery response it produces, or a transcript of a deposition or hearing in
which it participates, or of a pleading or other paper to be submitted, filed
or served in these Proceedings contains shipper-specific rate or cost data,
trackage rights compensation levels or other competitively sensitive or
proprietary information, then that party may designate and stamp such
Confidential Information as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.” Any information or documents
so designated or stamped shall be handled as provided hereinafter. 4. Information and documents designated or
stamped as “CONFIDENTIAL” may not be disclosed in any way, directly or
indirectly, or to any person or entity except to an employee, counsel,
consultant, or agent of a party to these Proceedings, or an employee of such
counsel, consultant, or agent, who, before receiving access to such information
or documents, has been given and has read a copy of this Protective Order and
has agreed to be bound by its terms by signing a confidentiality undertaking
substantially in the form set forth at Exhibit A to this Order. 5. Information and documents designated or
stamped as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” may not be disclosed in any way, directly or
indirectly, to any employee of a party to these Proceedings, or to any other
person or entity except to an outside counsel or outside consultant to a party
to these Proceedings, or to an employee of such outside counsel or outside
consultant, who, before receiving access to such information or documents, has
been given and has read a copy of this Protective Order and has agreed to be
bound by its terms by signing a confidentiality undertaking substantially in
the form set forth at Exhibit B to this order. 6. Any party to these Proceedings may challenge
the designation by any other party of information or documents as
“CONFIDENTIAL” or as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” by filing a motion with the Board or
with an administrative law judge or other officer to whom authority has been
lawfully delegated by the Board to adjudicate such challenges. 7. Designated Material may not be used for any
purposes, including without limitation any business, commercial or competitive
purposes, other than the preparation and presentation of evidence and argument
in Docket No. FD 35622, any related proceedings before the Surface
Transportation Board, and/or any judicial review proceedings in connection with
Docket No. FD 35622 and/or with any related proceedings. 8. Any party who receives Designated Material in
discovery shall destroy such materials and any notes or documents reflecting
such materials (other than file copies of pleadings or other documents filed
with the Board and retained by outside counsel for a party to these
Proceedings) at the earlier of (1) such time as the party receiving the
materials withdraws from these Proceedings, or (2) the completion of these
Proceedings, including any petitions for reconsideration, appeals, remands. 9. No party may include Designated Material in
any pleading, brief, discovery request or response, or other document submitted
to the Board, unless the pleading or other document is submitted under seal, in
a package clearly marked on the outside as “Confidential Materials Subject to
Protective Order.” See 49 C.F.R. § 1104.14. All pleadings and other
documents so submitted shall be kept confidential by the Board and shall not be
placed in the public docket in these Proceedings except by order of the Board
or of any administrative law judge or other officer in the exercise of authority
lawfully delegated by the Board. 10. No party may include Designated Material in
any pleading, brief, discovery request or response, or other document submitted
to any forum other than this Board in these Proceedings unless (1) the pleading
or other document is submitted under seal in accordance with a protective order
that requires the pleading or other document to be kept confidential by that
tribunal and not be placed in the public docket in the proceeding, or (2) the
pleading or other document is submitted in a sealed package clearly marked,
“Confidential Materials Subject to Request for Protective Order,” and is
accompanied by a motion to that tribunal requesting issuance of a protective
order that would require the pleading or other document be kept confidential
and not be placed in the public docket in the proceeding, and requesting that,
if the motion for protective order is not issued by that tribunal, the pleading
or other document be returned to the filing party. 11. No party may present or otherwise use any
Designated Material at a Board hearing in these Proceedings, unless that party
has previously submitted, under seal, all proposed exhibits and other documents
containing or reflecting such Designated Material to the Board, to an administrative
law judge or to another officer to whom relevant authority has been lawfully
delegated by the Board, and has accompanied such submission with a written
request that the Board, administrative law judge or other officer (a) restrict
attendance at the hearing during any discussion of such Designated Material,
and (b) restrict access to any portion of the record or briefs reflecting
discussion of such Designated Material in accordance with this Protective
Order. 12. If any party intends to use any Designated
Material in the course of any deposition in these Proceedings, that party shall
so advise counsel for the party producing the Designated Material, counsel for
the deponent, and all other counsel attending the deposition. Attendance at any
portion of the deposition at which any Designated Material is used or discussed
shall be restricted to persons who may review that material under the terms of
this Protective Order. All portions of deposition transcripts or exhibits that
consist of, refer to, or otherwise disclose Designated Material shall be filed
under seal and be otherwise handled as provided in Paragraph 9 of this
Protective Order. 13. To the extent that materials reflecting
Confidential Information are produced by a party in these proceedings, and are
held and/or used by the receiving person in compliance with Paragraphs 1, 2 or
3 above, such production, disclosure, holding, and use of the materials and of
the data that the materials contain are deemed essential for the disposition of
this and any related proceedings and will not be deemed a violation of 49
U.S.C. § 11904 or of any other relevant provision of the ICC Termination Act of
1995. 14. All parties must comply with all of the
provisions of this Protective Order unless the Board or an administrative law
judge or other officer exercising authority lawfully delegated by the Board
determines that good cause has been shown warranting suspension of any of the
provisions herein. 15. Nothing in this Protective Order restricts
the right of any party to disclose voluntarily any Confidential Information
originated by that party, or to disclose voluntarily any Confidential Documents
originated by that party, if such Confidential Information or Confidential
Documents do not contain or reflect any Confidential Information originated by
any other party. 16. All parties must file simultaneously a public
version of any Highly Confidential or Confidential submission filed with the
Board whether the submission is designated a Highly Confidential Version or
Confidential Version. When filing a Highly Confidential Version, the filing
party does not need to file a Confidential Version with the Board, but must
make available (simultaneously with the party’s submission to the Board of its
Highly Confidential Version) a Confidential Version reviewable by any other
party’s in-house counsel. The Confidential Version may be served on other
parties in electronic format only. In lieu of preparing a Confidential Version,
the filing party may (simultaneously with the party’s submission to the Board
of its Highly Confidential Version) make available to outside counsel for any
other party a list of all “highly confidential” information that must be
redacted from its Highly Confidential Version prior to review by in-house personnel,
and outside counsel for any other party must then redact that material from the
Highly Confidential Version before permitting any clients to review the
submission. Exhibit A UNDERTAKING – CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL I, ____________________________, have read the Protective Order
served on May 25, 2012, governing the production and use of Confidential
Information and Confidential Documents in Docket No. FD 35622 understand the same, and agree to be bound by its terms. I
agree not to use or permit the use of any Confidential Information or
Confidential Documents obtained pursuant to that Protective Order, or to use or
to permit the use of any methodologies or techniques disclosed or information
learned as a result of receiving such data or information, for any purpose,
other than the preparation and presentation of evidence and argument in Docket
No. FD 35622, any related proceedings before the Surface Transportation Board,
and/or any judicial review proceedings in connection with Docket No. FD 35622 and/or with any related proceedings. I further
agree not to disclose any Confidential Information, Confidential Documents,
methodologies, techniques, or data obtained pursuant to the Protective Order
except to persons who are also bound by the terms of the Order and who have
executed Undertakings in the form hereof, and that at the conclusion of this
proceeding (including any proceeding on administrative review, judicial review,
or remand), I will promptly destroy any documents containing or reflecting
materials designated or stamped as “CONFIDENTIAL”, other than file copies, kept
by outside counsel, of pleadings and other documents filed with the Board. I understand and agree that money damages would not be a
sufficient remedy for breach of this Undertaking and that parties producing
confidential information or confidential documents shall be entitled to
specific performance and injunctive and/or other equitable relief as a remedy
for any such breach, and I further agree to waive any requirement for the
securing or posting of any bond in connection with such remedy. Such remedy
shall not be deemed to be the exclusive remedy for breach of this Undertaking
but shall be in addition to all remedies available at law or equity. ___________________________________________ Dated: Exhibit B UNDERTAKING – HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL I, ____________________, am outside
[counsel] [consultant] for ____________________, for whom I am acting in this
proceeding. I have
read the Protective Order served on May 25, 2012, governing the production
and use of Confidential Information and Confidential Documents in Docket No. FD
35622 understand the same, and agree to be bound by
its terms. I agree not to use or to permit the use of any Confidential
Information or Confidential Documents obtained pursuant to that Protective
Order, or to use or to permit the use of any methodologies or techniques
disclosed or information learned as a result of receiving such data or
information, for any purpose other than the preparation and presentation of
evidence and argument in Docket No. FD 35622, any related proceedings before
the Surface Transportation Board, or any judicial review proceedings in
connection with Docket No. FD 35622 and/or with any related
proceedings. I further agree not to disclose any Confidential
Information, Confidential Documents, methodologies, techniques, or data
obtained pursuant to the Protective Order except to persons who are also bound
by the terms of the Order and who have executed undertakings in the form
hereof. I also understand and agree, as a condition precedent to my
receiving, reviewing, or using copies of any information or documents
designated or stamped as ‘HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”, that I will take all necessary
steps to assure that said information or documents be kept on a confidential
basis by any outside counsel or outside consultants working with me, that under
no circumstances will I permit access to said materials or information by
employees of my client or its subsidiaries, affiliates, or owners, and that at
the conclusion of this proceeding (including any proceeding on administrative
review, judicial review, or remand), I will promptly destroy any documents
containing or reflecting information or documents designated or stamped as “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL”, other than file copies, kept by outside counsel, of pleadings
and other documents filed with the Board. I understand and agree that money damages would not be a
sufficient remedy for breach of this undertaking and that other parties
producing confidential information or confidential documents shall be entitled
to specific performance and injunctive and/or other equitable relief as a
remedy for any such breach, and I further agree to waive any requirement for
the securing or posting of any bond in connection with such remedy. Such remedy
shall not be deemed to be the exclusive remedy for breach of this Undertaking
but shall be in addition to all remedies available at low or equity. _____________________________ OUTSIDE [COUNSEL]
[CONSULTANT] TO _____________________________ [Party Name] Dated: [1] Notice of the
control exemption was served and published in the Federal Register (77 Fed.
Reg. 30,589) on May 23, 2012. [2] Patriot and Sierra are currently involved in litigation before the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California in Patriot Rail Corp. v. Sierra Railroad Co., No. 2:09-CV-00009-MCE-EFB. Among other things, Sierra alleges that Patriot relied on proprietary financial and operational data received from Sierra to organize the Sacramento Valley Railroad Company, LLC (SAV) and bid against Sierra for the right to provide service within the McClellan industrial park in McClellan, Cal. In Sierra Railroad v. Sacramento Valley Railroad, STB Docket No. NOR 42133, Sierra alleges that SAV, McClellan Business Park, and the County of Sacramento failed to maintain reasonable practices under the Interstate Commerce Act by interfering with SERA’s common carrier obligation to provide service within the McClellan industrial park while at the same time failing to seek adverse discontinuance of SERA’s operating authority. [3] SteelRiver and
Patriot included a new proposed protective order, a confidential undertaking,
and a highly confidential undertaking with their motion. [4] See, e.g.,
Nittany & Bald Eagle R.R.—Temporary Trackage Rights Exemption—Norfolk S.
Ry., FD 35597 (STB served March 28, 2012); Sierra R.R. v. Sacramento
Valley R.R., NOR 42133 (STB served March 9, 2012). [5] The Revised
Protective Order provides that “Highly Confidential” information and documents
may be disclosed to “outside counsel,” rather than “outside STB counsel,” as
suggested by SteelRiver and Patriot.
Parties should note that, by execution of the Highly Confidential
Undertaking (Exhibit B), the undersigned counsel represents that he or she is
acting as outside counsel for a party “in this proceeding.” | |||