| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | NOR_42119_0 | ||
Case Title:   | NORTH AMERICA FREIGHT CAR ASSOCIATION V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED A JOINT REQUEST BY NORTH AMERICA FREIGHT CAR ASSOCIATION AND UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY TO ADOPT THE PROPOSED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE NEGOTIATED BY THE PARTIES. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 9 KB 17 KB 33 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 28 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
41789 SERVICE DATE – LATE
RELEASE AUGUST 2, 2011 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. NOR 42119 Decided: August
2, 2011 This decision adopts the procedural schedule negotiated
by the parties and submitted with North America Freight Car Association’s
(NAFCA) first amended complaint. On April 15, 2010, NAFCA filed a complaint against Union
Pacific Railroad Company (UP), alleging that provisions of Item 200-A of UP’s
Freight Tariff 6004 Series constitute unreasonable practices and violations of
UP’s common carrier obligation. On
May 5, 2010, UP filed an answer to the complaint, generally denying
NAFCA’s allegations. By a series of decisions, the most recent served on
May 13, 2011, the proceeding was held in abeyance until July 8, 2011,
so that the parties could engage in informal discovery and consider mediation
to resolve this dispute or narrow the issues.[1] The parties
also were directed, jointly or separately, to file either a request for
mediation or a proposed procedural schedule by July 8, 2011. On July 7, 2011, NAFCA: (1) filed its first amended complaint;
(2) notified the Board that the parties had failed to reach a negotiated
agreement and advised the Board that no further negotiations appear warranted;
and (3) submitted for the Board’s consideration a procedural schedule
negotiated by the parties with a request for a Board order embracing the
proposed procedural schedule. On
July 27, 2011, UP filed an answer to NAFCA’s first amended complaint. The
request is reasonable. The proposed
procedural schedule, negotiated by the parties, will be adopted. The procedural schedule will be as follows: July 18,
2011 Discovery begins September 16,
2011 Discovery ends October 31,
2011 NAFCA Opening Statement due December 21,
2011 UP Reply Statement due January 27,
2012 NAFCA Rebuttal due This action will not
significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the
conservation of energy resources. It is ordered: 1. NAFCA’s and UP’s joint request to adopt the
proposed procedural schedule is granted. 2. The procedural
schedule set forth above is adopted. 3.
This decision is effective on its date of service. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of
Proceedings. [1] On
June 25, 2010, NAFCA filed a motion for a protective order to facilitate
informal discovery, to which UP concurred.
By decision served on July 12, 2010, the motion for a protective order
was granted, and a protective order was adopted. | |||