| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | NOR_42120_0 | ||
Case Title:   | CARGILL, INCORPORATED V. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED A MODIFIED JOINT MOTION TO REVISE THE PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE IN THIS PROCEEDING FILED BY CARGILL, INCORPORATED AND BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 18 KB 17 KB 39 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 35 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
41766 SERVICE DATE – LATE
RELEASE JULY 19, 2011 DO SURFACE
TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. NOR 42120 CARGILL, INCORPORATED v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY Decided:
July 18, 2011 In connection with a
complaint filed under 49 U.S.C. § 11701(b), Cargill, Incorporated
(Cargill), on March 31, 2011, filed a motion to compel discovery from
defendant, BNSF Railway Company (BNSF).
On April 11, 2011, BNSF replied in opposition, and, at the Board’s
request, Cargill filed a response on April 15, 2011. Pursuant to 49 C.F.R. § 1114.31(a)(3), Board
staff held a conference with Cargill and BNSF on April 26, 2011, to assist them
in resolving these discovery matters.
Following the conference, the parties engaged in further discussions and
resolved the remaining issues in the motion to compel. In a decision served on June 24, 2011, the
Board granted Cargill’s motion to withdraw its motion to compel discovery
without prejudice. On July 12, 2011, Cargill and BNSF filed a modified
joint motion to revise the procedural schedule that was adopted by the Board in
a decision served on January 4, 2011, and was the subject of a joint motion to
revise that was filed on April 13, 2011.
They
request that the procedural schedule be modified as follows: June
24, 2011—End of Discovery August
25, 2011— Cargill Opening Statement October
24, 2011— BNSF Reply Statement November
23, 2011—Cargill Rebuttal Statement Cargill and BNSF both reserve the right under the modified proposed procedural schedule to seek
follow-up on discovery served on or before June 24, 2011, and to object to any
such follow-up requests. The revised procedural schedule is reasonable and
will be adopted. This action will not significantly
affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of
energy resources. It is ordered: 1. Cargill’s and BNSF’s modified joint motion to
revise the procedural schedule is granted. The
procedural schedule set forth above is adopted.
2. This decision is effective on the date of
service. By the Board, Rachel D.
Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. | |||