|SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT|
|RAILROAD REVENUE ADEQUACY - 2010 DETERMINATION|
|DECISION FINDS THAT ONE CLASS I RAILROAD (UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY) WAS REVENUE ADEQUATE FOR THE YEAR 2010, MEANING THAT ONE OF THE CLASS I RAILROADS ACHIEVED A RATE OF RETURN EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE BOARD’S CALCULATION OF THE AVERAGE COST OF CAPITAL TO THE FREIGHT RAIL INDUSTRY.|
| 255 KB|
|Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 1 Minutes|
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com.
|Full Text of Decision|
43498 SERVICE DATE – JANUARY 2, 2014
SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD
Docket No. EP 552 (Sub-No. 15)
RAILROAD REVENUE ADEQUACY—2010 DETERMINATION
Digest: Taking into consideration BNSF Railway Company’s refiled 2010 R-1 data, the Board finds that one Class I railroad (Union Pacific Railroad Company) was revenue adequate for the year 2010, meaning that one of the Class I railroads achieved a rate of return equal to or greater than the Board’s calculation of the average cost of capital to the freight rail industry.
Decided: December 31, 2013
This annual determination of railroad revenue adequacy under 49 U.S.C. § 10704(a)(3) is made in accordance with the standards and procedures developed in Standards for Railroad Revenue Adequacy (Standards I), 364 I.C.C. 803 (1981), Standards for Railroad Revenue Adequacy (Standards II), 3 I.C.C.2d 261 (1986), and Supplemental Reporting of Consolidated Information for Revenue Adequacy (Supplemental Reporting), 5 I.C.C.2d 65 (1988). Pursuant to those procedures, which are essentially mechanical, a railroad is considered revenue adequate under 49 U.S.C. § 10704(a) if it achieves a rate of return on net investment (ROI) equal to at least the current cost of capital for the railroad industry.
In Railroad Cost of Capital—2010, EP 558 (Sub-No. 14) (STB served Oct. 3, 2011), we determined that the 2010 railroad industry cost of capital was 11.03%. By comparing this figure to the 2010 ROI data obtained from the carriers’ Annual Report R-1 Schedule 250 filings, we have calculated a revenue adequacy figure for each of the Class I freight railroads that were in operation as of December 31, 2010.
A summary of the ROIs for all Class I railroads is set forth in Appendix A to this decision. Appendix B provides the railroads’ R-1 Schedule 250 data that was used to compute the ROIs. We find one carrier (Union Pacific Railroad Company) to be revenue adequate for 2010. Our findings with respect to the Class I carriers will be final on the effective date of this decision.
This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources.
It is ordered:
1. This decision is effective on January 2, 2014.
2. Notice of this decision will be published in the Federal Register.
By the Board, Chairman Elliott, Vice Chairman Begeman, and Commissioner Mulvey.
 The digest constitutes no part of the decision of the Board but has been prepared for the convenience of the reader. It may not be cited to or relied upon as precedent. Policy Statement on Plain Language Digests in Decisions, EP 696 (STB served Sept. 2, 2010).
 The Board determined the revenue adequacy for 2010 of each Class I railroad in a previous decision served in this docket on November 3, 2011. Now that BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) has refiled its R-1 reports for 2010-2012 in compliance with Western Coal Traffic League—Petition for Declaratory Order, FD 35506 (served July 25, 2013), this decision reflects that filing and includes a revised determination of BNSF’s revenue adequacy for 2010. This updated decision also replaces the name “Norfolk Southern Railway Company” with “Norfolk Southern Combined Railroad Subsidiaries” and adds a footnote to accompany that change. The November 3, 2011 decision remains unchanged in all other respects.
 See n. 2.
 Pursuant to Standards I, Standards II, and Supplemental Reporting, revenue adequacy determinations for Class I carriers are made on a system-wide basis, which includes certain railroad affiliates.