| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | FD_35393_0 | ||
Case Title:   | PROVIDENCE AND WORCESTER RAILROAD COMPANY--PETITION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER--GARDNER BRANCH | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS PROCEEDING. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 24 KB 28 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 25 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
41073 SERVICE DATE – MAY 26, 2011 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. FD 35393 Decided: May 25, 2011 Providence and Worcester Railroad
Company (P&W) on July 20, 2010, filed a petition for a declaratory order
with respect to its Gardner Branch, a 26.1-mile line extending between
Worcester and Gardner, Mass. P&W seeks to construct a second track on the Gardner
Branch right-of-way but claims that it cannot
do so while New England Power Company d/b/a National
Grid occupies a portion of the right-of-way for an electric transmission line. P&W requests that the Board remove
any uncertainty regarding its exclusive jurisdiction over P&W’s use of the Gardner Branch right-of-way and find that P&W has the right to the
exclusive use of the right-of-way and that regulation of its use of the right-of-way
under Massachusetts General Law, c. 164, § 73 by the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities is
preempted under 49 U.S.C. § 10501(b). On August 30, 2010, National Grid filed a reply and a separate motion seeking a protective order under 49 C.F.R. § 1104.14 to protect the production and possible use of information that P&W regards as commercially sensitive and confidential or highly confidential and to protect commercially sensitive and confidential information that National Grid may submit in this proceeding. National Grid claims that a protective order is necessary to protect such information from public disclosure. In a filing on September 7, 2010, P&W argues that there is no need for discovery or a procedural schedule and therefore no need for a protective order. P&W contends there are no material facts at issue, just a single narrow legal issue, whether M.G.L., c. 164, § 73 is preempted under 49 U.S.C. § 10501(b). In P&W’s view National Grid is trying to complicate and expand the scope of this proceeding in an effort to further delay, frustrate, or jeopardize P&W’s plan to expand rail operations over its own right-of-way.[1] In a decision being served simultaneously with this one, the Board is instituting a declaratory order proceeding and directing P&W and National Grid to participate in a meeting to explore any and all options that may help to resolve this dispute. Granting the motion for protective order will permit the fullest possible discussion of the issues at the meeting and will facilitate the sharing of information in this proceeding. Accordingly, good cause exists to grant National Grid’s motion for protective order. Unrestricted disclosure of confidential, proprietary, or commercially sensitive information and data could cause serious competitive injury to the parties. The motion conforms to the Board’s rules at 49 C.F.R. § 1104.14 governing protective orders. Issuance of the protective order will ensure that confidential information will be used solely for this proceeding and not for other purposes. National Grid’s proposed Protective Order and Undertakings, as modified in the Appendix to this decision, will be adopted. This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources. It is ordered: 1. The motion for a protective order is granted, and the Protective Order and Undertakings in the Appendix to this decision are adopted. 2. This decision is effective on its service date. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. APPENDIX PROTECTIVE ORDER 1. Any party producing information, data,
documents, or other material (hereinafter collectively referred to as
“material”) in discovery to another party to this proceeding, or submitting
material in pleadings, that the party in good faith believes reflects
proprietary or confidential information or “critical energy infrastructure
information” as that term is defined in Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
regulations (“CEII”), may designate and stamp such material as “CONFIDENTIAL,”
and such material must be treated as confidential. Such material, any copies, and any data or
notes derived therefrom: (a) Shall be used solely for the purpose of
this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding arising therefrom, and not
for any other business, commercial, or competitive purpose. (b) May be disclosed only to employees,
counsel, or agents of the party requesting such material, who have a need to
know, handle, or review the material for purposes of this proceeding and any
judicial review proceeding arising therefrom, only when such employees,
counsel, or agents have been given and haves read a copy of this Protective
Order, agreed to be bound by its terms, and have executed the attached
Undertaking for Confidential Material prior to receiving access to such
materials. (c) Must be destroyed by the requesting party,
its employees, counsel, and agents at the completion of this proceeding and any
judicial review proceeding arising therefrom.
However, counsel for a party is permitted to retain file copies of all
pleadings filed with the Board which they were authorized to review under
this Protective Order, including paragraph 10 of this Protective Order. (d) If contained in any pleading filed with
the Board shall, in order to be kept confidential, be filed only in pleadings
submitted in a package clearly marked on the outside “Confidential Materials
Subject to Protective Order.” See
49 C.F.R. §
1104.14. 2. Any party producing material in
discovery to another party to this proceeding or submitting material in
pleadings may in good faith designate and stamp particular material, such as
material containing shipper-specific rate or cost data or other competitively
sensitive information, as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.” If any party wishes to challenge such
designation, the party may bring such material to the attention of the
Board. Material that is so designated
may be disclosed only to outside counsel or outside consultants of the party
requesting such materials who have a need to know, handle, or review the
materials for purposes of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding
arising therefrom, provided that such outside counsel or outside consultants
have been given and have read a copy of this Protective Order, agreed to be
bound by its terms, and executed the attached Undertaking for Highly
Confidential Material prior to receiving access to such materials. Material designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
and produced in discovery under this provision shall be subject to all of the
other provisions of this Protective Order, including without limitation
paragraph 1 of this Protective Order. 3. In the event a party produces material
which should have been designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
and inadvertently fails to designate the material as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL,” the producing party may notify the receiving party in writing
within 5 days of discovery of the producing party’s inadvertent failure to make
the confidentiality designation. The
party who received the material without the confidentiality designation will either
return or destroy the non-designated portion (including any and all copies), as
directed by the producing party, or take such other steps as the parties agree
to in writing. The producing party will
promptly furnish the receiving party with properly designated material. 4. In the event that a party inadvertently
produces material that is protected by the attorney-client privilege, work
product doctrine, or any other privilege, the producing party within a
reasonable time after it discovers the inadvertent disclosure may make a
written request that the receiving party return the inadvertently produced
privileged document. The party who
received the inadvertently produced document will either return or destroy the
document immediately upon receipt of the written request, as directed by the
producing party. By returning or
destroying the document, the receiving party is not conceding that the document
is privileged and is not waiving its right to later challenge the substantive
privilege claim, provided that it may not challenge the privilege claim by
arguing that the inadvertent production waived the privilege. 5. If any party intends to use
“CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material at hearings in this
proceeding, or in any judicial review proceeding arising therefrom, the party
so intending shall submit any proposed exhibits or other documents setting
forth or revealing such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material to
the Board, or the court, as appropriate, with a written request that the Board
or the court: (a) restrict attendance at
the hearings during discussion of such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material; and (b) restrict access to the portion of the record or
briefs reflecting discussion of such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material in accordance with the terms of this Protective Order. 6. If any party intends to use
“CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material in the course of any
deposition in this proceeding, the party so intending shall so advise counsel
for the party producing the materials, counsel for the deponent, and all other
counsel attending the deposition, and all portions of the deposition at which
any such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material is used shall be
restricted to persons who may review the material under this Protective
Order. All portions of deposition
transcripts and/or exhibits that consist of or disclose “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material shall be kept under seal and treated as
“CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material in accordance with the
terms of this Protective Order. 7. To the extent that material reflecting
shipper-specific traffic data or other proprietary information is produced by a
party in this or any related proceedings and is held and used by the receiving
person in compliance with this Protective Order, such production, disclosure,
and use of the material and of the data that the material contains will be
deemed essential for the disposition of this and any related proceedings and
will not be deemed a violation of 49 U.S.C. § 11904. 8. Except for this proceeding, the parties
agree that if a party is required by law or order of a governmental or judicial
body to release “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material produced by
the other party or copies or notes thereof as to which it obtained access
pursuant to this Protective Order, the party so required shall notify the
producing party in writing within 3 working days of the determination that the
“CONFIDENTIAL” material, “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material, or copies or notes are
to be released, or within 3 working days prior to such release, whichever is
soonest, to give the producing party the opportunity to contest the release. The provisions of this paragraph
notwithstanding, the parties agree to use their best efforts to prevent disclosure
of CEII to a government or judicial body (other than the Board) without a
protective order from such government or judicial body preventing disclosure of
CEII to the public. 9. Information that is publicly available
or obtained outside of this proceeding from a person with a right to disclose
it shall not be subject to this Protective Order even if the same information
is produced and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” in this
proceeding. 10. Each party has a right to view its own
data, information, and documentation (i.e., information originally generated or
compiled by or for that party), even if that data, information, and
documentation has been designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” by a producing party,
without securing prior permission from the producing party. If a party (the “filing party”) files and
serves upon another party (the “reviewing party”) a pleading or evidence
containing the filing party’s “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material, the filing party shall
also prepare and serve contemporaneously upon the reviewing party a
“CONFIDENTIAL” version of the pleading or evidence from which the filing
party’s “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material has been redacted. The “CONFIDENTIAL” version may be provided in
hardcopy or electronic format at the option of the filing party, and may be
disclosed to those personnel employed by the reviewing party who have read a
copy of this Protective Order and executed the attached Undertaking for Confidential
Material (“In-house Personnel”). In lieu
of preparing a “CONFIDENTIAL” version, the filing party may (simultaneously with the party’s submission to the Board of its “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” version) make available to outside counsel for any other party a
list of all “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” information
that must be redacted from its “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” version prior to
review by In-house Personnel, and outside counsel for any other party must then
redact that material from the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” version before permitting
any clients to review the submission. 11. Any party filing with the Board a
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” pleading in this proceeding should
simultaneously file a public version of the pleading. UNDERTAKING CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL I,
_______________________________, have read the Protective Order served on May 26,
2011, governing the production of confidential documents in FD 35393,
understand the same, and agree to be bound by its terms. I agree not to use or permit the use of any
data or information obtained under this Undertaking, or to use or permit the
use of any techniques disclosed or information learned as a result of receiving
such data or information, for any purposes other than the preparation and
presentation of evidence and argument in FD 35393 or any judicial review
proceeding arising therefrom. I further
agree not to disclose any data or information obtained under this Protective
Order to any person who has not executed an Undertaking in the form
hereof. At the conclusion of this proceeding
and any judicial review proceeding arising therefrom, I will promptly destroy
any copies of such designated documents obtained or made by me or by any
outside counsel or outside consultants working with me, provided, however, that
outside counsel may retain file copies of pleadings filed with the Board. I
understand and agree that money damages would not be a sufficient remedy for
breach of this Undertaking and that parties producing confidential documents
shall be entitled to specific performance and injunctive or other equitable
relief as a remedy for any such breach, and I further agree to waive any
requirement for the securing or posting of any bond in connection with such
remedy. Such remedy shall not be deemed
to be the exclusive remedy for breach of this Undertaking but shall be in
addition to all remedies available at law or equity. Signed:___________________________________ Print:_____________________________________ Affiliation:________________________________ Dated:____________________________________ UNDERTAKING HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL As outside
[counsel] [consultant] for _________________________, for which I am acting in
this proceeding, I have read the Protective Order served on May 26, 2011,
governing the production of confidential documents in FD 35393, understand the
same, and agree to be bound by its terms.
I further agree not to disclose any data, information, or material
designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” to any person or entity who: (i) is not eligible for access to “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material under the terms of the Protective Order, or
(ii) has not executed a “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” undertaking in the form
hereof. I also understand and agree, as
a condition precedent to my receiving, reviewing, or using copies of any
documents designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL,” that I will limit my use of those
documents and the information they contain to this proceeding and any judicial
review proceeding arising therefrom, that I will take all necessary steps to
assure that said documents and information will be kept on a confidential basis
by any outside counsel or outside consultants working with me, that under no
circumstances will I permit access to said documents or information by
personnel of my client, its subsidiaries, affiliates, or owners, and that at
the conclusion of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding arising therefrom,
I will promptly destroy any copies of such designated documents obtained or
made by me or by any outside counsel or outside consultants working with me,
provided, however, that outside counsel may retain file copies of pleadings
filed with the Board. I further
understand that I must destroy all notes or other documents containing such
highly confidential information in compliance with the terms of the Protective
Order. Under no circumstances will I
permit access to documents designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” by, or disclose any
information contained therein to, any persons or entities for which I am not
acting in this proceeding. I
understand and agree that money damages would not be a sufficient remedy for
breach of this Undertaking and that parties producing confidential documents
shall be entitled to specific performance and injunctive or other equitable relief
as a remedy for any such breach, and I further agree to waive any requirement
for the securing or posting of any bond in connection with such remedy. Such remedy shall not be deemed to be the
exclusive remedy for breach of this Undertaking but shall be in addition to all
remedies available at law or equity. ____________________________________ OUTSIDE
[COUNSEL] [CONSULTANT] Print:________________________________ Affiliation:___________________________ Dated: _____________________________ [1] On September 9, 2010, National Grid filed a motion to strike portions of P&W’s reply, arguing that it impermissibly addresses the merits of the dispute. P&W filed a reply to the motion on September 10, 2010. The Board will address the motion in a subsequent decision. | |||