| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | AB_55_682_X | ||
Case Title:   | CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.--ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION--IN GREENBRIER AND FAYETTE COUNTIES, W. VA. | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED A REQUEST FILED BY GREENBRIER COUNTY COMMISSION AND THE FAYETTE COUNTY COMMISSION TO EXTEND A NOTICE OF INTERIM TRAIL USE OR ABANDONMENT NEGOTIATING PERIOD UNTIL AUGUST 14, 2011. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 10 KB 18 KB 34 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 30 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
41461 SERVICE DATE – MARCH 9, 2011 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. AB 55 (Sub-No. 682X) CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.—ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION—IN GREENBRIER AND FAYETTE COUNTIES, W. VA. Decided: March 8, 2011 CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT) filed a notice of exemption under 49 C.F.R. pt. 1152 subpart F—Exempt Abandonments to abandon a 16.7-mile line of railroad on CSXT’s Southern Region, Huntington-East Division, Sewell Subdivision, between milepost CAF 27, near Rainelle, and milepost CAF 43.7, near Nallen, in Greenbrier and Fayette Counties, W. Va. Notice of the exemption was served and published in the Federal Register on April 3, 2008 (April 2008 notice) (73 Fed. Reg. 18,322-23). By decision and notice of interim trail use or abandonment (NITU) served on August 29, 2008, the proceeding was reopened and a 180-day period was authorized for Greenbrier County Commission and the Fayette County Commission (the Counties) to negotiate an interim trail use/rail banking agreement with CSXT for the right-of-way involved in this proceeding, pursuant to the National Trails System Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1247(d) (Trails Act). By decisions served on February 24, 2009, August 25, 2009, March 15, 2010, and August 24, 2010, the NITU negotiating period was extended until February 15, 2011. On February 15, 2011, the Counties filed a request for an extension of the negotiating period for 180 days.[1] The Counties state that the parties desire to continue negotiations for a NITU, and the county commissions and CSXT have agreed to a purchase agreement. The Counties also state that the conclusion of the purchase is dependent on the completion of an environmental assessment. By letter filed on February 22, 2011, CSXT concurs with the extension request.[2] Where, as here, the carrier has
not consummated the abandonment at the end of the previously imposed
negotiating period and has indicated its willingness to continue negotiations
by agreeing to an extension, the Board retains jurisdiction and the NITU
negotiating period may be extended.[3] Under the circumstances, further extension of
the negotiating period is warranted. See
Birt v. STB, 90 F.3d 580, 588-90 (D.C.
Cir. 1996); This decision will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources. It is ordered: 1. The Counties’ request to extend the NITU negotiating period is granted. 2. The negotiating period under the NITU is extended until August 14, 2011. 3. This decision is effective on its service date. By the Board, Joseph H. Dettmar, Acting Director, Office of Proceedings. [1] The Counties incorrectly identified February 17, 2011, as the expiration of the NITU negotiating period. The NITU extension will be calculated from the correct date of February 15, 2011. [2] CSXT notes that, under 49 C.F.R. § 1152.29(e)(2), the requested extension of the NITU negotiating period creates a regulatory barrier to consummation of the abandonment. For that reason, if the NITU negotiating period expires without the parties having reached an agreement, CSXT’s notice of consummation will be due not later than 60 days thereafter. See 49 C.F.R. § 1152.29(e)(2). [3] See Rail Aban.—Use-of-Rights-of-Way as Trails Supplemental Trails Act Procedures, 4 I.C.C.2d 152, 157-58 (1987). | |||