SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT
    Decision Information

Docket Number:  
NOR_42125_0

Case Title:  
E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY V. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

Decision Type:  
Decision

Deciding Body:  
Director Of Proceedings

    Decision Summary

Decision Notes:  
DECISION GRANTED SEPARATE MOTIONS TO WITHDRAW TWO PREVIOUSLY FILED MOTIONS TO COMPEL DISCOVERY.

    Decision Attachments

9 KB
18 KB
38 KB

Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 31 Seconds

Note:
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com.

    Full Text of Decision

41633 SERVICE DATE – LATE RELEASE MAY 23, 2011

DO

 

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

 

DECISION

 

Docket No. NOR 42125

 

E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY

v.

NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY

 

Decided: May 23, 2011

 

This decision grants separate motions to withdraw 2 previously filed motions to compel discovery.

 

In connection with a complaint challenging the reasonableness of the defendant railroad’s rates for the transportation of 27 different commodities between 160 origin and destination pairs, E.I. du Pont de Nemours and Company (DuPont) filed, on April 14, 2011, a motion to compel discovery from defendant Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSR) to provide documents responsive to DuPont’s Requests for Production (RFP) numbers 167 and 168. NSR replied in opposition to DuPont’s motion on April 25, 2011. On April 20, 2011, NSR filed a motion to compel discovery from DuPont to provide documents responsive to NSR’s RFP number 20. DuPont replied in opposition to NSR’s motion on May 2, 2011.

 

Pursuant to 49 C.F.R.  1114.31(a)(3), Board staff held a conference with DuPont and NSR on May 6, 2011, to assist the parties in resolving these discovery matters. Under 49 C.F.R.  1114.31(a)(4), the Board has 5 business days from the date of the discovery conference to issue a decision on a motion to compel discovery. By decision served on May 13, 2011, based on continuing negotiations between the parties after the discovery conference and with the consent of the parties, the Board extended the deadline for a decision on the motions to compel discovery by 10 days.

 

On May 19, 2011, DuPont filed with the Board a motion to withdraw its motion to compel discovery, and on May 20, 2011, NSR filed a motion to withdraw its motion to compel discovery. Both motions state that the parties have come to an agreement regarding the discovery at issue. Because neither party has received the requested discovery and cannot yet determine whether the documents are sufficiently responsive, both parties ask that their respective motions to withdraw be granted without prejudice.

 

Both Dupont’s motion to withdraw its motion to compel discovery and NSR’s motion to withdraw its motion to compel discovery will be granted without prejudice.

 

This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources.

 

It is ordered:

 

1. DuPont’s motion to withdraw its motion to compel discovery is granted without prejudice.

 

2. NSR’s motion to withdraw its motion to compel discovery is granted without prejudice.

 

3. This decision is effective on the date of service.

 

By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings.