| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | FD_35387_0 | ||
Case Title:   | AG PROCESSING INC A COOPERATIVE--PETITION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED, AS DISCUSSED BELOW, A REQUEST FILED BY AG PROCESSING INC A COOPERATIVE, WHICH ASKED THAT TIME BE ADDED TO THE END OF OCTOBER 25, 2011'S PUBLIC SESSION. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 28 KB 18 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 22 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
41950 SERVICE DATE – LATE RELEASE
OCTOBER 19, 2011 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. FD 35387 AG PROCESSING INC A COOPERATIVE—PETITION FOR
DECLARATORY ORDER Decided:
October 19, 2011 On July 20, 2010, Ag Processing Inc A Cooperative (Ag Processing) filed a petition for
declaratory order challenging the reasonableness of a Norfolk Southern Railway
Company (NSR) tariff insofar as it imposes charges and penalties on loaded rail
cars that exceed the car’s weight limit as a result of weather conditions
encountered after the car is delivered to the railroad. The petition was amended to add other
shippers[1]
and
to continue the challenge after NSR revised the tariff. At Petitioners’ request, the Board ordered
the parties to mediate the dispute, but mediation was unsuccessful, and NSR
filed a motion to dismiss the petition on January 27, 2011, along with
confidential materials subject to a protective order. The Petitioners filed their reply on March 8,
2011. In
a decision served on September 22, 2011, the Board instituted a declaratory
order proceeding regarding this matter and announced that the agency would hold
an oral argument on October 25, 2011.
The Board stated that the argument will be broadcast and open to the
public, but that only counsel for both sides will be allowed to present
argument. Both sides were given 20
minutes to present argument, and Petitioners were given the option to reserve
time for rebuttal. The Petitioners have
provided notice that they will be represented by Andrew P. Goldstein, and NSR
has provided notice that it will be represented by Robert A. Wimbish. On October 14, 2011, Petitioners
submitted a filing noting that part of the record consists of highly
confidential material. They ask that the
Board add time at the end of the public session where both sides can present
argument concerning this sensitive material.
Petitioners represent that NSR agrees to the proposal. Petitioners ask for five minutes of
additional time to present argument concerning highly confidential material,
five minutes for NSR’s response, and time for rebuttal if the Petitioners saved
any of their five minutes. The request to close from the public
a portion of the oral argument to present highly confidential material and the
request for additional time will both be granted because they are reasonable
and agreed to by both sides. After the
end of the public session, the video broadcast will be terminated. The hearing room will be cleared except for
Board staff and those who have complied with the protective order to access
highly confidential material for this proceeding. It is ordered: 1.
The Petitioners’ request is granted as discussed above. 2. This decision is effective on the date of
service. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell,
Director, Office of Proceedings. | |||