| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | NOR_42120_0 | ||
Case Title:   | CARGILL, INCORPORATED V. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER IN THIS PROCEEDING. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 25 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 33 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
40888 SERVICE
DATE – LATE RELEASE JUNE 24, 2010 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD CORRECTED DECISION Docket No. NOR 42120 CARGILL, INCORPORATED v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER Decided: June
15, 2010 On April 19, 2010, Cargill, Incorporated (Cargill), filed
a complaint against BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) under 49 U.S.C.
§ 11701(b), seeking the prescription of reasonable fuel surcharge practices and
monetary damages. On May 24, 2010, Cargill
filed a motion seeking a protective order under 49 C.F.R.
§ 1104.14 to protect confidential and commercially sensitive material. Cargill submits that a protective order is
necessary to facilitate the potential exchange and use of commercially
sensitive material in this proceeding.
BNSF in its report on the parties’ conference, filed on May 26, 2010,
acknowledges that the parties have agreed to the terms of a proposed protective
order and states that it does not oppose the motion for a protective order.[1]
Good cause exists to grant the motion for protective
order. Unrestricted disclosure of
confidential, proprietary, or commercially sensitive information and data could
cause serious competitive injury to the parties. The motion conforms with
the Board’s rules at 49 C.F.R. § 1104.14
governing protective orders. Issuance of
the protective order will ensure that confidential information will be used solely for this proceeding and not for other
purposes. Accordingly, the motion for a protective
order will be granted,[2]
and the proposed Protective Order and Undertakings, as modified in the Appendix
to this decision, will be adopted.[3]
This action will not significantly affect either the
quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources. It is ordered: 1. The motion for
a protective order is granted, and the Protective
Order and Undertakings in the Appendix to this decision are adopted. 2. This decision
is effective on the service date. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of
Proceedings. APPENDIX PROTECTIVE
ORDER 1. Any
party producing information, data, documents or other material (hereinafter
collectively referred to as “material”) in discovery to another party to this
proceeding, or submitting material in pleadings, that the party in good faith
believes reflects proprietary or confidential information, may designate and
stamp such material as “CONFIDENTIAL,”
and such material must be treated as confidential. Such material, any copies, and any data or
notes derived therefrom: (a) Shall
be used solely for the purpose of
this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom,
and not for any other business, commercial, or competitive purpose. (b) May
be disclosed only to employees, counsel, or agents of the party requesting such
material who have a need to know, handle, or review the material for purposes
of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom, and only where such employee, counsel, or agent
has been given and has read a copy of this Protective Order, agrees to be bound
by its terms, and executes the attached Undertaking for Confidential Material,
prior to receiving access to such materials. (c)
Must be destroyed by the requesting party, its employees, counsel, and
agents, at the completion of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding
arising herefrom.
However, outside counsel and consultants for a party are
permitted to retain file copies of all pleadings filed with the Board. (d) If contained in any pleading filed with
the Board shall, in order to be kept confidential, be
filed only in pleadings submitted in a package clearly marked on the outside
“Confidential Materials Subject to Protective Order.” See
49 C.F.R. § 1104.14. 2. Any
party producing material in discovery to another party to this proceeding, or
submitting material in pleadings, may in good faith
designate and stamp particular material, such as material containing
shipper-specific rate or cost data or other competitively sensitive information,
as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.” If any party
wishes to challenge such designation, the party may bring such matter to the
attention of the Board. Material that is so designated may be disclosed only to outside
counsel or outside consultants of the party requesting such materials who have
a need to know, handle, or review the materials for purposes of this proceeding
and any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom,
provided that such outside counsel or outside consultants have been given and
have read a copy of this Protective Order, agree to be bound by its terms, and
execute the attached Undertaking for Highly Confidential Material prior to
receiving access to such materials.
Material designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” and produced in discovery
under this provision shall be subject to all of the other provisions of this
Protective Order, including without limitation paragraph 1. 3. In the
event that a party produces material which should have
been designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” and inadvertently
fails to designate the material as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL,” the
producing party may notify the other party in writing within 5 days of
discovery of its inadvertent failure to make the confidentiality designation. The party who received the material without
the confidentiality designation will return the non-designated portion
(including any and all copies) or destroy it, as
directed by the producing party, or take such other steps as the parties agree
to in writing. The producing party will
promptly furnish the receiving party with properly designated material. 4. In the
event that a party inadvertently produces material that is protected by the
attorney-client privilege, work product doctrine, or any other privilege, the producing
party may make a written request within a reasonable time after the producing
party discovers the inadvertent disclosure that the other party
return the inadvertently produced privileged document. The party who received the inadvertently
produced document will either return the document to the producing party or
destroy the document immediately upon receipt of the written request, as
directed by the producing party. By
returning or destroying the document, the receiving party is not conceding that
the document is privileged and is not waiving its right to later challenge the
substantive privilege claim, provided that it may not
challenge the privilege claim by arguing that the inadvertent production waived
the privilege. 5. If
any party intends to use “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material
at hearings in this proceeding, or in any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom, the party so intending shall submit any proposed
exhibits or other documents setting forth or revealing such “CONFIDENTIAL”
and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material to the Board, or the court, as
appropriate, with a written request that the
Board or the court: (a) restrict
attendance at the hearings during discussion of such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material; and (b) restrict access to the portion of the
record or briefs reflecting discussion of such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material in accordance with the terms of this Protective Order. 6. If
any party intends to use “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material
in the course of any deposition in this proceeding, the party so intending
shall so advise counsel for the party producing the materials, counsel for the
deponent, and all other counsel attending the deposition, and all portions of
the deposition at which any such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
material is used shall be restricted to persons who may review the material
under this Protective Order. All portions of deposition transcripts and/or
exhibits that consist of or disclose “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material shall be kept under seal and treated
as “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material in accordance with the
terms of this Protective Order. 7. Each
party is ordered to produce to the other party documents or information which,
because of confidentiality provisions, cannot be produced without a Board order
directing their production to the extent that (1) the other party has requested
that the documents be produced in discovery, and (2) the parties agree that the
requested documents would be properly discoverable in this proceeding but for
the confidentiality provision(s). Such documents shall be required to be
produced only after the other party(ies) who are entitled to prior notice have been provided
written notice and a reasonable opportunity to object to that production and
obtain a ruling from the Board on that objection. Any documents produced pursuant to this
Section 7 shall be treated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
and shall otherwise be subject to the terms of this Protective Order. To the extent that material
reflecting the terms of contracts, shipper-specific data, traffic data, or
other proprietary information is produced by a party in this or any related
proceedings and is held and used by the receiving person in compliance with
this Protective Order, such production, disclosure, and use of the material and
of the data that the material contains will be deemed essential for the
disposition of this and any related proceedings and will not be deemed a
violation of 49 U.S.C. § 11904. 8. Except
for this proceeding, the parties agree that if a party is required by law or
order of a governmental or judicial body to release “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material produced by the other party or copies or notes thereof
as to which it obtained access pursuant to this Protective Order, the party so
required shall notify the producing party in writing within 3 working days of
the determination that the “CONFIDENTIAL” material, “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
material, or copies or notes are to be released, or within 3 working days prior
to such release, whichever is soonest, to permit the producing party the
opportunity contest the release. 9. Information that is publicly available or obtained outside
of this proceeding from a person with a right to disclose it shall not be
subject to this Protective Order even if the same information is produced and designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” in this proceeding. 10. Each party has a right to view its own data, information and
documentation (i.e., information originally generated or compiled by or for
that party), even if that data, information and documentation has been
designated as Highly Confidential by a producing party, without securing prior
permission from the producing party. If a party (the “filing party”) files and
serves upon the other party (the “reviewing party”) a pleading or evidence
containing the filing party’s Highly Confidential material, the filing party
shall also prepare and serve contemporaneously upon the reviewing party a
Confidential Version of the pleading or evidence from which the filing party’s
Highly Confidential material has been redacted.
The Confidential Version may be provided in
hardcopy or electronic format at the option of the filing party, and may be
disclosed to those personnel employed by the reviewing party who have read a
copy of this Protective Order and executed the attached Undertaking for
Confidential Material (“In-house Personnel”).
In lieu of preparing a “CONFIDENTIAL” version, the
filing party may (simultaneously with the party’s submission to the Board of
its “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” version) make available to outside counsel for any
other party a list of all “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” information that must be
redacted from its “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” version prior to review by in-house
personnel, and outside counsel for any other party must then redact that
material from the “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” version before permitting any clients
to review the submission. 11. Any party filing with the Board a “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” pleading in this proceeding should simultaneously file a public
version of the pleading. UNDERTAKING CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL I, _______________________________, have read the
Protective Order served June 16, 2010, governing the production of
confidential documents in Docket No. 42120, understand the same, and agree to
be bound by its terms. I agree not to use or permit the use of any data or information
obtained under this Undertaking, or to use or permit the use of any techniques
disclosed or information learned as a result of receiving such data or
information, for any purposes other than the preparation and presentation of
evidence and argument in Docket No. 42120 or any judicial review proceeding
arising herefrom. I further agree not to disclose any data or
information obtained under this Protective Order to any person who has not
executed an Undertaking in the form hereof.
At the conclusion of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding
arising herefrom, I will promptly destroy any copies
of such designated documents obtained or made by me or by any outside counsel
or outside consultants working with me, provided, however, that outside counsel
may retain file copies of pleadings filed with the Board. I understand and agree that money
damages would not be a sufficient remedy for breach of this Undertaking and
that parties producing confidential documents shall be entitled to specific
performance and injunctive or other equitable relief as a remedy for any such
breach, and I further agree to waive any requirement for the securing or
posting of any bond in connection with such remedy. Such remedy shall not be deemed to be the exclusive remedy for breach of this Undertaking
but shall be in addition to all remedies available at law or equity. ___________________________________ Dated: UNDERTAKING HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL As outside [counsel] [consultant] for , for which I am
acting in this proceeding, I have read the Protective Order served June 16,
2010, governing the production of confidential documents in Docket No. 42120,
understand the same, and agree to be bound by its terms. I further agree not to disclose any data,
information or material designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” to any person or
entity who: (i) is not eligible for access to HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL material under the terms of the Protective Order, or (ii) has not
executed a HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL undertaking in the form hereof. I also understand and
agree, as a condition precedent to my receiving, reviewing, or using copies of
any documents designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL,” that I will limit my use of
those documents and the information they contain to this proceeding and any
judicial review proceeding arising herefrom, that I
will take all necessary steps to assure that said documents and information
will be kept on a confidential basis by any outside counsel or outside
consultants working with me, that under no circumstances will I permit access
to said documents or information by personnel of my client, its subsidiaries,
affiliates, or owners, and that at the conclusion of this proceeding and any
judicial review proceeding arising herefrom, I will
promptly destroy any copies of such designated documents obtained or made by me
or by any outside counsel or outside consultants working with me, provided,
however, that outside counsel may retain file copies of pleadings filed with
the Board. I further understand
that I must destroy all notes or other documents containing such highly
confidential information in compliance with the terms of the Protective
Order. Under no circumstances will I
permit access to documents designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” by, or disclose any
information contained therein to, any persons or entities for which I am not
acting in this proceeding. I understand and agree that money
damages would not be a sufficient remedy for breach of this Undertaking and
that parties producing confidential documents shall be entitled to specific
performance and injunctive or other equitable relief as a remedy for any such
breach, and I further agree to waive any requirement for the securing or
posting of any bond in connection with such remedy. Such remedy shall not be deemed to be the exclusive remedy for breach of this Undertaking
but shall be in addition to all remedies available at law or equity. _____________________________
OUTSIDE
[COUNSELCONSULTANT] Dated: [1] On May 28, 2010, BNSF filed a motion for partial
dismissal of the complaint and requested that the Board rule on the motion
before it adopts a procedural schedule. That motion will be
addressed in a subsequent Board decision. [2] This decision
corrects the decision that was served on June 16,
2010. That decision had incorrectly stated
that Cargill’s complaint was filed on May 24, 2010,
that Cargill’s motion for a protective order was “concurrently” filed on that
date, and that BNSF’s motion for partial dismissal was filed on May 26, 2010. [3] A proposed Protective Order and Undertakings were included with the motion. | |||