| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | FD_35302_0 | ||
Case Title:   | BELL OIL TERMINAL, INC. V. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION: (1) ORDERED MEDIATION IN THIS PROCEEDING; AND (2) HELD THIS PROCEEDING IN ABEYANCE FOR 60 DAYS WHILE ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION PROCEDURES ARE ONGOING. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 9 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 23 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
40819 SERVICE
DATE – JUNE 4, 2010 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. FD 35302 BELL OIL TERMINAL, INC. v. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY Decided: June
3, 2010 This decision holds the proceeding in abeyance while the
parties mediate a dispute over a switch connection request. On October 6, 2009, Bell Oil Terminal, Inc. (Bell Oil),
filed a complaint against BNSF Railway Company (BNSF), alleging that BNSF has
violated 49 U.S.C. § 11103 by failing to construct, maintain, and operate
a switch connection between BNSF’s rail line and a private side track to be
constructed by Bell Oil at its Pulaski Terminal in Chicago, Ill., and asking
the Board to require BNSF to do so. On
October 26, 2009, BNSF separately filed an answer and a motion to dismiss
the complaint, alleging that Bell Oil’s complaint is premature. On May
19, 2010, Bell Oil and BNSF jointly filed a request that the Board mediate this
dispute and issue a 60-day “housekeeping” stay to permit the Board-supervised
mediation. The Board’s regulations
provide for the use of alternative dispute resolution (ADR), including
mediation, in cases such as this upon the mutual consent of the parties. See 49 C.F.R. § 1109.1. Because the parties jointly have consented to
mediation in writing, the Board will provide for a 60-day period for
non-binding mediation, and will designate a staff member to serve as
mediator. The proceeding will be held in
abeyance for 60 days while the parties pursue a mediated agreement.[1] Within
5 business days of the effective date of this decision, the mediator shall
contact the parties to discuss ground rules and the time and location of any
meetings. At least 1 principal of each
party, who has the authority to commit that party, shall participate in the
mediation and be present at any session at which the mediator requests that the
principal be present. The parties are
instructed to inform the Board when mediation has ended, with or without a
resolution. The
parties are expected to work together to develop an appropriate confidentiality
agreement and, if necessary, request that a protective order be issued by the
Board. This action will not
significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the
conservation of energy resources. It is ordered: 1. Mediation is ordered as described above. A member of the Board staff will be designated
to serve as mediator pursuant to the instructions set forth above. 2. The proceeding is held in abeyance for 60
days while ADR procedures are ongoing. 3.
This decision is effective on its date of service. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of
Proceedings. [1] A request from Bell Oil to hold the complaint in abeyance pending the disposition of the motion to dismiss currently is pending before the Board. It will be considered in a subsequent decision, if necessary. | |||