SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT
    Decision Information

Docket Number:  
AB_6_468_X

Case Title:  
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY-ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION-IN KOOTENAI COUNTY, IDAHO

Decision Type:  
Decision

Deciding Body:  
Director Of Proceedings

    Decision Summary

Decision Notes:  
DECISION: (1) REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING; AND (2) REMOVED A CONDITION IMPOSED IN A DECISION SERVED ON NOVEMBER 27, 2009.

    Decision Attachments

10 KB
21 KB
26 KB

Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 27 Seconds

Note:
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com.

    Full Text of Decision

38056

41540 SERVICE DATE – LATE RELEASE MAY 11, 2011

DO

 

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

 

DECISION

 

Docket No. AB 6 (Sub-No. 468X)

 

BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY—ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION—

IN KOOTENAI COUNTY, IDAHO

 

Decided: May 11, 2011

 

By decision served on November 27, 2009, the Board, under 49 U.S.C. 10502, exempted from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10903, the abandonment by BNSF Railway Company (BNSF) of a 6.23-mile rail line between milepost 6.10, near Port Falls, and milepost 12.33, at Coeur d’Alene, in Kootenai County, Idaho. The exemption was subject to environmental and standard employee protective conditions.

 

The environmental conditions required that BNSF: (1) prior to the commencement of any salvage activities, consult with U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Idaho Field Office (USFWS), to assess potential impacts to the Bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), a Federally listed threatened species, and identify any appropriate mitigation measures that may be warranted, and to report the results of the USFWS consultations to the Board’s Section of Environmental Analysis (SEA)[1] in writing prior to the onset of salvage operations; (2) prior to the commencement of any salvage activities, consult with Idaho Department of Environmental Quality, Remediation Section, to ensure that any concerns regarding potential contamination of the right-of-way are addressed, and report the results of these consultations in writing to SEA prior to the onset of salvage operations; (3) notify U.S. Department of Commerce, National Geodetic Survey, at least 90 days prior to beginning salvage activities in order to plan for the possible relocation of 5 station markers; and (4) (a) retain its interest in and take no steps to alter the historic integrity of all historic properties including sites, buildings, structures, and objects within the project right-of-way (Area of Potential Effect) that are eligible for listing or listed in the National Register of Historic Places until the Section 106 process of the National Historic Preservation Act, 16 U.S.C. 470f, has been completed, (b) report to SEA regarding any consultations with the Idaho State Historical Society, Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and the public, and (c) not file its consummation notice or initiate any salvage activities related to abandonment (including removal of tracks and ties) until the Section 106 process has been completed and the Board has removed the condition.[2]

 

On January 4, 2011, OEA sent a letter to USFWS detailing BNSF’s plans to salvage the line, assessing the effect of salvage on the Federally listed threatened Bull trout, and seeking USFWS’ concurrence that salvage would not result in any adverse effect on the Bull trout. By letter dated March 3, 2011, USFWS stated that it concurs with OEA’s determination that salvage, as proposed by BNSF, would not result in any adverse effect on the Federally listed threatened Bull trout. Therefore, based on the information provided, OEA recommends that the USFWS consultation condition imposed in the November 27, 2009 decision be removed. Accordingly, the proceeding will be reopened and the previously imposed USFWS consultation condition will be removed. The remaining 2 salvage conditions listed in the November 27, 2009 decision remain in effect, but are not barriers to consummation.

 

This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources.

 

It is ordered:

 

1. This proceeding is reopened.

 

2. Upon reconsideration, the USFWS consultation condition imposed in the November 27, 2009 decision is removed.

 

3. This decision is effective on its service date.

 

By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings.

 

 



[1] Effective September 1, 2010, SEA became the Office of Environmental Analysis (OEA).

[2] By decision served on March 11, 2010, the proceeding was reopened and the Section 106 historic preservation condition was removed.