| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | NOR_42119_0 | ||
Case Title:   | NORTH AMERICA FREIGHT CAR ASSOCIATION V. UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION EXTENDED THE DUE DATE FOR THE PARTIES TO FILE EITHER A REQUEST FOR MEDIATION OR A PROPOSED PROCEDURAL SCHEDULE AND HOLDS THE PROCEEDING IN ABEYANCE UNTIL JULY 8, 2011. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 9 KB 16 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 12 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
41615 SERVICE
DATE – MAY 13, 2011 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. NOR 42119 Decided: May
12, 2011 This decision extends the due date by which the parties
are to file either a request for mediation or a proposed procedural schedule
and holds the proceeding in abeyance until then. On April 15, 2010, North America Freight Car Association
(NAFCA) filed a complaint against Union Pacific Railroad Company (UP), alleging
that provisions of Item 200-A of UP’s Freight Tariff 6004 Series constitute
unreasonable practices and violations of UP’s common carrier obligation. On May 5, 2010, UP filed an answer to
the complaint, generally denying NAFCA’s allegations. By a series of decisions, the most recent served on
March 15, 2011, the proceeding was held in abeyance
until May 9, 2011, so that the parties could engage in informal discovery
and consider mediation to resolve this dispute or narrow the issues.[1] The parties
also were directed, jointly or separately, to file either a request for
mediation or a proposed procedural schedule by May 9, 2011. In a letter filed on May 6, 2011, NAFCA requests
that the Board extend the negotiation/mediation process until July 8,
2011, and that the proceeding continue to be held in abeyance. In its letter, NAFCA states that the parties
recently have exchanged proposed new versions of the tariff provision at issue
and hope that negotiations are reaching a dispositive point. The
request is reasonable. The due date for
the parties, jointly or separately, to file either a request for mediation or,
if the parties no longer wish to consider mediation, a proposed procedural
schedule will be extended from May 9, 2011, to July 8, 2011, and the
proceeding will be held in abeyance until that date. This action will not
significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the
conservation of energy resources. It is ordered: 1. The date for the parties, jointly or
separately, to file either a request for mediation or a proposed procedural
schedule is extended to July 8, 2011. 2. The proceeding
is held in abeyance until July 8, 2011. 3.
This decision is effective on its date of service. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of
Proceedings. [1] On
June 25, 2010, NAFCA filed a motion for a protective order to facilitate
informal discovery, to which UP concurred.
By decision served on July 12, 2010, the motion for a protective order
was granted, and a protective order was adopted. | |||