| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | AB_55_682_X | ||
Case Title:   | CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.--ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION--IN GREENBRIER AND FAYETTE COUNTIES, W. VA. | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED A REQUEST TO EXTEND THE NOTICE OF INTERIM TRAIL USE NEGOTIATING PERIOD UNTIL FEBRUARY 10, 2012. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 16 KB 18 KB 33 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 32 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
41825 SERVICE DATE – SEPTEMBER 12, 2011 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. AB 55 (Sub-No. 682X) CSX TRANSPORTATION, INC.—ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION—IN GREENBRIER AND FAYETTE COUNTIES, W. VA. Decided: September 12, 2011 CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT)
filed a notice of exemption under 49 C.F.R. pt. 1152 subpart F—Exempt
Abandonments to abandon a 16.7-mile line of railroad on CSXT’s Southern
Region, Huntington-East Division, Sewell Subdivision, between milepost CAF 27,
near Rainelle, and milepost CAF 43.7, near Nallen, in
Greenbrier and Fayette Counties, W. Va.
Notice of the exemption was served and published in the Federal Register
on April 3, 2008 (April 2008 notice) (73 Fed. Reg.
18,322-23). By decision and
notice of interim trail use or abandonment (NITU) served on
August 29, 2008, the proceeding was reopened and a 180-day period was
authorized for Greenbrier County Commission and the Fayette County Commission
(the Counties) to negotiate an interim trail use/rail banking agreement with
CSXT for the right-of-way involved in this proceeding, pursuant to the National
Trails System Act, 16 U.S.C. § 1247(d) (Trails Act). By a series of
decisions served from February 24, 2009, to
March 9, 2011, the NITU negotiating period was extended until August 14, 2011. On August 15, 2011, the Counties filed a request for an extension of the negotiating period for 180 days. The Counties state that the purchase of the property was made available through a grant through the West Virginia Division of Transportation, Division of Highways (Division of Highways), Recreation Trail program. The Counties state that the parties have concluded a final NITU agreement, but that the Division of Highways has not yet disbursed the grant funds to pay for the trail. The Counties anticipate that the final disbursement will be completed within the next 60 days. By letter filed on August 29, 2011, CSXT concurs with the extension request.[1] Where, as here, the carrier has
not consummated the abandonment at the end of the previously imposed
negotiating period and has indicated its willingness to continue negotiations
by agreeing to an extension, the Board retains jurisdiction and the NITU
negotiating period may be extended.[2] Under the circumstances, further extension of
the negotiating period is warranted. See
Birt v. STB, 90 F.3d 580, 588-90 (D.C.
Cir. 1996); This decision will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources. It is ordered: 1. The Counties’ request to extend the NITU negotiating period is granted. 2. The negotiating period under the NITU is extended until February 10, 2012. 3. This decision is effective on its service date. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. [1] CSXT notes that, under 49 C.F.R. § 1152.29(e)(2), the requested extension of the NITU negotiating period creates a regulatory barrier to consummation of the abandonment. For that reason, if the NITU negotiating period expires without the parties having reached an agreement, CSXT’s notice of consummation will be due not later than 60 days thereafter. See 49 C.F.R. § 1152.29(e)(2). [2] See Rail Aban.—Use-of-Rights-of-Way as Trails Supplemental Trails Act Procedures, 4 I.C.C.2d 152, 157-58 (1987). | |||