| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | FD_35468_0 | ||
Case Title:   | PINELAWN CEMETERY--PETITION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED NEW YORK & ATLANTIC RAILWAY COMPANY'S REQUEST TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE FOR FILING A REPLY TO PINELAWN CEMETERY'S PETITION TO MARCH 7, 2011. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 7 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 17 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
41438 SERVICE DATE – LATE RELEASE FEBRUARY 24, 2011 DO Surface Transportation Board Decision Docket No. FD 35468 PINELAWN CEMETERY—PETITION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER Decided: February 24, 2011 On February 3, 2011, Pinelawn Cemetery (Pinelawn) filed a petition for declaratory order asking the Board to declare that track in the Farmingdale Yard in Farmingdale, N.Y., is not now, nor ever has been, a “line of railroad” over which the Board has exclusive jurisdiction. Rather, petitioner argues, the track at issue is excepted spur track under 49 U.S.C. § 10906. Pinelawn is the owner of the property where the Farmingdale Yard is located. In 1997, the New York & Atlantic Railway Company (NY&A) obtained authority from the Board to operate the track in the yard. By letter filed February 14, 2011, NY&A requested the Board to extend the filing deadline for replies to Pinelawn’s petition to March 7, 2011. NY&A states that Pinelawn has agreed to NY&A’s proposed deadline. The Board has good cause to grant NY&A’s extension request and will do so. This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human
environment or the conservation of energy resources. It is ordered: 1. NY&A’s request to extend the deadline for filing a reply to Pinelawn’s petition is granted. 2. Replies to Pinelawn’s petition are due on or before March 7, 2011. 3.
This decision is
effective on its service date. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. | |||