SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT
    Decision Information

Docket Number:  
AB_565_17_X

Case Title:  
NEW YORK CENTRAL LINES, LLC-- ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION--IN DUTCHESS COUNTY, N.Y.

Decision Type:  
Decision

Deciding Body:  
Director Of Proceedings

    Decision Summary

Decision Notes:  
DECISION: (1) REOPENED THIS PROCEEDING, AND (2) GRANTED A REQUEST FILED BY THE GEORGETOWN AND HIGH LINE RAILWAY COMPANY, LLC, TO ISSUE A NEW NOTICE OF INTERIM TRAIL USE NEGOTIATING PERIOD IN THIS PROCEEDING.

    Decision Attachments

50 KB
21 KB

Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 33 Seconds

Note:
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com.

    Full Text of Decision

42150 SERVICE DATE – LATE RELEASE JANAURY 23, 2012

DO

 

SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD

 

DECISION AND NOTICE OF INTERIM TRAIL USE OR ABANDONMENT

 

Docket No. AB 565 (Sub-No. 17X)

 

NEW YORK CENTRAL LINES, LLC—ABANDONMENT EXEMPTION—IN DUTCHESS COUNTY, N.Y.

 

Decided: January 23, 2012

 

This decision reopens this proceeding and issues a new notice of interim trail use for a portion of the line sought to be abandoned.

 

By decision and notice of interim trail use or abandonment (NITU) served on October 15, 2004 (October 2004 decision), the Board, under 49 U.S.C. 10502, exempted from the prior approval requirements of 49 U.S.C. 10903 the abandonment by New York Central Lines, LLC (NYC), of approximately 4.7 miles of railroad line between milepost QCO 0.0 and milepost QCO 3.2 and between milepost QCK 29.5 and milepost QCK 31.0, in the City and Town of Poughkeepsie, Dutchess County, N.Y. (the line).[1] The October 2004 decision included a NITU under the National Trails System Act, 16 U.S.C. 1247(d), and 49 C.F.R. 1152.29 authorizing a 180-day period for Dutchess County to negotiate an interim trail use/rail banking agreement with NYC for the right-of-way (ROW) (October 2004 NITU). The October 2004 decision also imposed several environmental conditions.

 

By decision and NITU served on August 26, 2009, a second NITU was issued for Poughkeepsie-Highland Bridge Co., Inc., d/b/a Walkway Over the Hudson (Walkway) to negotiate an interim trail use/rail banking agreement with CSXT[2] for a 0.5-mile portion of the 4.7-mile ROW between milepost QCK 29.5 and milepost QCK 30.0. By letter filed on September 10, 2009, CSXT stated that Walkway and CSXT had entered into a Purchase and Sale Agreement for the 0.5-mile portion to be transferred to Walkway.

 

Meanwhile, the NITU negotiating period for the remaining 4.2 miles of the ROW (between milepost QCO 0.0 and milepost QCO 3.2 and between milepost QCK 30.0 and milepost QCK 31.0) under the original October 2004 NITU was extended several times, most recently until September 14, 2010.[3]

 

By decision and NITU served on December 29, 2011, a third NITU was issued for Walkway to negotiate an interim trail use/rail banking agreement with CSXT for a 1.0-mile segment of the line between milepost QCK 30.0 and milepost QCK 31.0.

 

On January 5, 2012, counsel for Georgetown and High Line Railway Company, LLC (GHL) late filed a request for issuance of a NITU for a 3.2-mile segment of the line between milepost QCO 0.0 and milepost QCO 3.2 (the remaining segment of the 4.2 miles of the ROW).[4] In support of its request, GHL asserts that CSXT has not complied with the environmental conditions imposed in this proceeding, including one that required CSXT to complete the New York Department of State’s Coastal Management Program Federal Consistency Assessment (NYDS Coastal Management condition), which GHL asserts was never done. GHL contends that this condition is a regulatory or legal barrier to consummation and that the consummation deadline therefore will not occur until 60 days after CSXT complies with the condition. GHL thus argues that the abandonment authority is still in effect, that CSXT has not consummated the abandonment, and that the 3.2-mile line segment remains eligible for the issuance of a NITU.

 

In a response filed on January 6, 2012, CSXT concurs that it has not complied with the conditions imposed in the October 2004 decision and has not consummated the abandonment of the rail line between milepost QCO 0.0 and milepost QCO 3.2. Additionally, CSXT agrees to negotiate interim trail use/rail banking with GHL for the 3.2-mile segment between milepost QCO 0.0 and milepost QCO 3.2.

 

Trail use requests may be accepted as long as the Board retains jurisdiction over the ROW and the carrier is willing to enter into negotiations. That is the case here. Although many consultation conditions typically are not regulatory barriers to consummation, the NYDS Coastal Management condition, which requires consultation with the New York Department of State, Coastal Management Program, may affect land or water uses within a coastal zone (49 U.S.C.  1105.9), and thus is a barrier to consummation in this case. See Puget Sound & Pac. R.R.―Aban. Exemption―in Grays Harbor Cnty, Wash., AB 1023 (Sub-No. 1X), slip op. at 4 (STB served Sept. 13, 2011). Because CSXT has not yet complied with that condition, the abandonment authority remains in effect and cannot yet be consummated, and the Board retains jurisdiction over the line. And, as noted above, CSXT has agreed to negotiate with GHL regarding the 3.2-mile segment.

 

In its request, GHL has included a statement of willingness to assume full financial responsibility for the management of, for any legal liability arising out of the transfer or use of, and for the payment of any and all taxes that may be levied or assessed against, the ROW, as required at 49 C.F.R. 1152.29, and has acknowledged that the use of the ROW for trail purposes is subject to possible future reconstruction and reactivation of the line for rail service.

 

Because CSXT agrees to GHL’s request for a new NITU and GHL’s request complies with the requirements of 49 C.F.R.  1152.29, a fourth NITU will be issued. The parties may negotiate an agreement during the 180-day period prescribed below. If the parties reach a mutually acceptable final agreement, no further Board action is necessary. If no agreement is reached within 180 days, CSXT may fully abandon the 3.2-mile line segment. See 49 C.F.R.  1152.29(d)(1). Use of the ROW for trail purposes is subject to any future use of the property for restoration of railroad operations.

 

This action will not significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the conservation of energy resources.

 

It is ordered:

 

1. This proceeding is reopened.

 

2. GHL’s late-filed request for a NITU under 16 U.S.C. 1247(d) is granted.

 

3. Upon reconsideration, the October 2004 decision exempting the abandonment of the line described above is modified to the extent necessary to implement interim trail use/rail banking as set forth below to permit GHL to negotiate with CSXT for a period of 180 days commencing from the service date of this decision and notice (until July 21, 2012) for trail use for the 3.2-mile segment of the line between mileposts QCO 0.0 and QCO 3.2.

 

4. If an interim trail use/rail banking agreement is reached, it must require the trail user to assume, for the term of the agreement, full responsibility for the management of, for any legal liability arising out of the transfer or use of (unless the user is immune from liability, in which case it need only indemnify the railroad against any potential liability), and for the payment of any and all taxes that may be levied or assessed against, the ROW.

 

5. Interim trail use/rail banking is subject to any future use of the property for restoration of railroad operations and to the user’s continuing to meet the financial obligations for the ROW.

 

6. If interim trail use is implemented and subsequently the user intends to terminate trail use, it must send the Board a copy of this decision and notice and request that it be vacated on a specified date.

 

7. If an agreement for interim trail use/rail banking is reached by July 21, 2012, interim trail use may be implemented. If no agreement is reached by that time and there are no legal or regulatory barriers to consummation, CSXT may fully abandon the 3.2 line segment between mileposts QCO 0.0 and QCO 3.2. See 49 C.F.R.  1152.29(d)(1).

 

8. This decision is effective on its service date.

 

By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings.



[1] The October 2004 decision also embraced Docket No. AB 873X, New York & Eastern Railway, LLC—Discontinuance Exemption—in Dutchess County, N.Y., and Docket No. AB 55 (Sub-No. 652X), CSX Transportation, Inc.—Discontinuance Exemption—in Dutchess County, N.Y., in which New York and Eastern Railway, LLC, and CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSXT), sought an exemption to discontinue service over the line.

[2] CSXT is the successor to NYC. See CSX Corp.—Control & Operating Leases/Agreements—Conrail Inc., FD 33388 (Sub-No. 94) (STB served Nov. 7, 2003) (authorizing consolidation of NYC within CSXT).

[3] See N.Y. Central Lines, LLC—Aban. Exemption—In Dutchess Cnty, N.Y., AB 565 (Sub-No. 17X) (STB served April 5, 2010).

[4] The notice instituting an exemption proceeding, which was served and published in the Federal Register on July 19, 2004 (69 Fed. Reg. 43,054), provided that requests for trail use/rail banking were to be filed by August 9, 2004. However, in Abandonment & Discontinuance Of Rail Lines & Transportation Under 49 U.S.C. 10903, 1 S.T.B. 894 (1996) and 2 S.T.B. 311 (1997), the Board retained the policy of accepting requests after the due date when good cause is shown. Because there is no indication that Walkway’s late-filed request will prejudice any party, it will be accepted. See Wheeling & Lake Erie Ry.―Aban. Exemption―in Starke Cnty., Ohio, AB 227 (Sub-No. 10X), slip op. at 1 n.1. (STB served Nov. 7, 1997).