| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information | |||
Docket Number:   | NOR_42125_0 | ||
Case Title:   | E.I. DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY V. NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY | ||
Decision Type:   | Decision | ||
Deciding Body:   | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| Decision Summary | |||
Decision Notes:   | DECISION GRANTED A MOTION FOR A PROTECTIVE ORDER. | ||
| Decision Attachments | |||
| 25 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 35 Seconds | |||
If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | |||
|
41341 SERVICE
DATE – JANUARY 11, 2011 DO SURFACE
TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. NOR 42125 E.I.
DUPONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY v. NORFOLK
SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE
ORDER Decided: January 10, 2011 This decision grants a motion for a protective order
for this proceeding. E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company (DuPont)
challenges the reasonableness of rates established by Norfolk Southern Railway
Company (NSR) for the transportation of 27
commodities between 146 origin and destination pairs. DuPont alleges that NSR possesses market dominance
over the traffic and requests that maximum reasonable rates be prescribed
pursuant to the Board’s Stand-Alone Cost test. On December 29, 2010, the parties jointly filed a motion for protective
order with respect to evidentiary submissions and discovery. The proposed protective order, as set forth
in the appendix to this decision, is consistent with the protective orders
entered by the Board in recent rate proceedings.[1] It includes provisions governing the
production of highly confidential material and other related provisions
required by Procedures to Expedite Resolution of Rail Rate Challenges to Be
Considered Under the Stand-Alone Cost Methodology, 6 S.T.B. 805,
813-15 (2003). The protective order also
stipulates (at paragraph 7) that the protected exchange of material will not be
deemed a violation of 49 U.S.C. § 11904. Also at paragraph 7, in order to avoid the
need for routine, unopposed motions to compel the disclosure of confidential
contracts related to the dispute, the protective order specifically provides
for the production of such contracts to enable a more efficient discovery
process. Good cause exists to grant the request for protective
order. The unrestricted disclosure of
confidential, proprietary, or commercially sensitive material could cause
serious competitive injury. Issuance of
the requested protective order will ensure that the material, produced in response to a
discovery request or otherwise, will be used only in connection with this
proceeding and not for any other business or commercial purpose. The motion conforms with
49 C.F.R. § 1104.14 governing requests for protective orders to
maintain confidentiality of materials submitted to the Board, and
49 C.F.R. § 1114.21(c) governing protective orders regarding
discovery. Accordingly, the request for
protective order will be granted. This decision will not
significantly affect either the quality of the human environment or the
conservation of energy resources. It
is ordered: 1. The parties’ motion for
protective order is granted. 2.
The parties are directed to comply with the protective order in the
appendix to this decision. 3. This decision is effective on its service
date. By
the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. APPENDIX PROTECTIVE ORDER 1. Any
party producing information, data, documents or other material (hereinafter
collectively referred to as “material”) in discovery to another party to this
proceeding, or submitting material in pleadings, that the party in good faith
believes reflects proprietary or confidential information, may designate and
stamp such material as “CONFIDENTIAL,” and such material must be treated as
confidential. Such material, any copies,
and any data or notes derived therefrom: (a) Shall be
used solely for the purpose of this proceeding and any judicial review
proceeding arising herefrom, and not for any other
business, commercial, or competitive purpose. (b) May be
disclosed only to employees, counsel, or agents of the party requesting such
material who have a need to know, handle, or review the material for purposes
of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom, and only where such employee, counsel, or agent
has been given and has read a copy of this Protective Order, agrees to be bound
by its terms, and executes the attached Undertaking for Confidential Material
prior to receiving access to such materials. (c) Must be
destroyed by the requesting party, its employees, counsel, and agents, at the
completion of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom. However,
outside counsel and consultants for a party are permitted to retain file copies
of all pleadings filed with the Board. (d) If
contained in any pleading filed with the Board shall, in order to be kept
confidential, be filed only in pleadings submitted in a package clearly marked
on the outside “Confidential Materials Subject to Protective Order.” See 49 C.F.R. § 1104.14. 2. Any party producing material in discovery to another party
to this proceeding, or submitting material in pleadings, may
in good faith designate and stamp particular material, such as material
containing specific rate, traffic, or cost data or other competitively
sensitive information, as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL.” If any party wishes to challenge such
designation, the party may bring such matter to the attention of the Board. Material that is so designated may be
disclosed only to outside counsel or outside consultants of the party
requesting such materials who have a need to know, handle, or review the
materials for purposes of this proceeding and any judicial review proceeding
arising herefrom, provided that such outside counsel
or outside consultants have been given and have read a copy of this Protective
Order, agree to be bound by its terms, and execute the attached Undertaking for
Highly Confidential Material prior to receiving access to such materials. Material designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
and produced in discovery under this provision shall be subject to all of the
other provisions of this Protective Order, including without limitation
paragraph 1. 3. In the event that a party produces material which should
have been designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” and
inadvertently fails to designate the material as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL,” the producing party may notify the other party in writing within
5 days of the producing party’s discovery of its inadvertent failure to make
the confidentiality designation. The
party who received the material (“receiving party”) without the confidentiality
designation will return the non-designated portion (including any and all
copies in any form or format) or destroy it, as directed by the producing
party, or take such other steps as the parties agree to in writing. The producing party will promptly furnish the
receiving party with properly designated material. 4. In the event that a party inadvertently produces material
that is protected by the attorney client privilege, work product doctrine, or
any other privilege or protection from discovery or disclosure, the producing
party may make a written request, within a reasonable time after the producing
party discovers the inadvertent disclosure, that the receiving party return the
inadvertently produced privileged document(s). The receiving party will either return the
inadvertently produced document(s) (including any and all copies in any form or
format) to the producing party or destroy that (those) document(s) immediately
upon receipt of the written request, as directed by the producing party. By returning or destroying the document, the
receiving party is not conceding that the document is privileged and is not
waiving its right to later challenge the substantive privilege claim, provided
that it may not challenge the privilege claim by arguing that the inadvertent
production waived the privilege. 5. If any party intends to use “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material at hearings in this proceeding, or in any judicial
review proceeding arising herefrom, the party so
intending shall submit any proposed exhibits or other documents setting forth
or revealing such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material to the
Board, or the court, as appropriate, with a written request that the Board or
the court: (a) restrict attendance at
the hearings during discussion of such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material; and (b) restrict access to the portion of the record or
briefs reflecting discussion of such “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
material in accordance with the terms of this Protective Order. 6. If any party intends to use “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material in the course of any deposition in this proceeding, the
party so intending shall so advise counsel for the party producing the
materials, counsel for the deponent, and all other counsel attending the
deposition, and all portions of the deposition at which any such “CONFIDENTIAL”
and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material is used shall be restricted to persons who
may review the material under this Protective Order. All portions of deposition transcripts and/or
exhibits that consist of or disclose “CONFIDENTIAL” and/or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” material shall be kept under seal and treated as “CONFIDENTIAL”
and/or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material in accordance with the terms of this
Protective Order. 7. Each party is ordered to produce to the other party
contracts (including but not limited to, rail transportation contracts) or
other documents or information which, because of confidentiality provisions,
cannot be produced without a Board order directing their production to the
extent that (1) the other party has requested that the documents be produced in
discovery, and (2) the parties agree that the requested documents would be
properly discoverable in this proceeding but for the confidentiality
provision(s). Such documents shall be
required to be produced only after the other party(ies)
to a contract (or other document subject to a confidentiality provision) who
are entitled to prior notice have been provided written notice and a reasonable
opportunity to object to that production and obtain a ruling from the Board on
that objection. Any documents
(including, without limitation, contracts) produced pursuant to this Section 7
shall be treated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” and shall otherwise be subject to the
terms of this Protective Order. To the
extent that material reflecting the terms of contracts, shipper-specific
traffic data, other traffic data, or other proprietary information is produced
by a party in this or any related proceedings and is held and used by the
receiving person in compliance with this Protective Order, such production,
disclosure, and use of the material and of the data that the material contains
will be deemed essential for the disposition of this and any related
proceedings and will not be deemed a violation of 49 U.S.C. § 11904. 8. Except for this proceeding, the parties agree that if a
party is required by law or order of a governmental or judicial body to release
“CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material produced by the other party or
copies or notes thereof as to which it obtained access pursuant to this
Protective Order, the party so required shall notify the producing party in writing
within 3 working days of the determination that the “CONFIDENTIAL” material,
“HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material, or copies or notes are to be released, or
within 3 working days prior to such release, whichever is soonest, to permit
the producing party the opportunity to contest the release. 9. Information that is publicly available or obtained outside
of this proceeding from a person with a right to disclose it shall not be
subject to this Protective Order even if the same information is produced and
designated as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” in this proceeding. 10. Each party has a right to view its own data, information, and
documentation (i.e., information originally generated or compiled by or for
that party), even if that data, information, and documentation has been
designated as “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” by a producing party, without securing
prior permission from the producing party. If a party (the “filing party”) files and
serves upon the other party (the “reviewing party”) a pleading or evidence
containing the filing party’s “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material, the filing party
shall also prepare and serve contemporaneously upon the reviewing party a
“CONFIDENTIAL” version of the pleading or evidence from which the filing
party’s “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material has been redacted. The “CONFIDENTIAL” version may be provided in
hardcopy or electronic format at the option of the filing party, and may be
disclosed to those personnel employed by the reviewing party who have read a
copy of this Protective Order and executed the attached Undertaking for
Confidential Material (“In-house Personnel”). 11. Any party filing with the Board a “CONFIDENTIAL” or “HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL” pleading in this proceeding should simultaneously file a public
version of the pleading. UNDERTAKING
CONFIDENTIAL
MATERIAL
I, _______________________________, have read the
Protective Order served on January 11, 2011, governing the production of
confidential documents in STB Docket No. NOR 42125, understand the same,
and agree to be bound by its terms. I
agree not to use or permit the use of any data or information obtained under
this Undertaking, or to use or permit the use of any techniques disclosed or information
learned as a result of receiving such data or information, for any purposes
other than the preparation and presentation of evidence and argument in STB
Docket No. NOR 42125 or any judicial review proceeding
arising herefrom. I further agree not to disclose any data or
information obtained under this Protective Order to any person who has not
executed an Undertaking in the form hereof. At the conclusion of this proceeding and any
judicial review proceeding arising herefrom, I will
promptly destroy any copies of such designated documents obtained or made by me
or by any outside counsel or outside consultants working with me, provided,
however, that outside counsel may retain file copies of pleadings filed with
the Board. I understand and agree that
money damages would not be a sufficient remedy for breach of this Undertaking
and that parties producing confidential documents shall be entitled to specific
performance and injunctive or other equitable relief as a remedy for any such
breach, and I further agree to waive any requirement for the securing or
posting of any bond in connection with such remedy. Such remedy shall not be deemed to be the
exclusive remedy for breach of this Undertaking but shall be in addition to all
remedies available at law or equity. Signature:
__________________________________ Date:
___________________ UNDERTAKING
HIGHLY
CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
As outside [counsel] [consultant] for
_______________________________, for which I am acting in this proceeding, I
have read the Protective Order served on January 11, 2011, governing the
production of confidential documents in STB Docket No. NOR 42125, understand
the same, and agree to be bound by its terms. I further agree not to disclose any data,
information or material designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” to any person or
entity who: (i)
is not eligible for access to “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” material under the terms of
the Protective Order, or (ii) has not executed a “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL”
undertaking in the form hereof. I also
understand and agree, as a condition precedent to my receiving, reviewing, or
using copies of any documents designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL,” that I will
limit my use of those documents and the information they contain to this
proceeding and any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom,
that I will take all necessary steps to assure that said documents and
information will be kept on a confidential basis by any outside counsel or
outside consultants working with me, that under no circumstances will I permit
access to said documents or information by personnel of my client, its
subsidiaries, affiliates, or owners, and that at the conclusion of this
proceeding and any judicial review proceeding arising herefrom,
I will promptly destroy any copies of such designated documents obtained or
made by me or by any outside counsel or outside consultants working with me,
provided, however, that outside counsel may retain file copies of pleadings
filed with the Board. I further
understand that I must destroy all notes or other documents containing such
highly confidential information in compliance with the terms of the Protective
Order. Under no circumstances will I
permit access to documents designated “HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL” by, or disclose any
information contained therein to, any persons or entities for which I am not
acting in this proceeding. I understand
and agree that money damages would not be a sufficient remedy for breach of
this Undertaking and that parties producing confidential documents shall be
entitled to specific performance and injunctive or other equitable relief as a
remedy for any such breach, and I further agree to waive any requirement for
the securing or posting of any bond in connection with such remedy. Such remedy shall not be deemed to be the
exclusive remedy for breach of this Undertaking but shall be in addition to all
remedies available at law or equity. ____________________________________ OUTSIDE [COUNSELCONSULTANT] Dated:
_____________________________ [1] See, e.g., M&G Polymers USA,
LLC v. CSX Transp., Inc., NOR 42123 (STB served Aug. 4, 2010); Total
Petrochemicals USA, Inc. v. CSX Transp., Inc., NOR 42121 (STB served
June 23, 2010); US Magnesium, L.L.C. v. Union | |||