| SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION DOCUMENT | |||
| Decision Information |  | | |
| | | |
Docket Number: | FD_35387_0 | | |
| | | |
Case Title: | AG PROCESSING INC A COOPERATIVE--PETITION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER | ||
| | | |
Decision Type: | Decision | ||
| | | |
Deciding Body: | Director Of Proceedings | ||
| | | |
| Decision Summary | | | |
| | | |
Decision Notes: | DECISION GRANTED NORFOLK SOUTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY'S REQUEST FOR ITS REPLY TO THE FORTHCOMING PETITION BE DUE 20 DAYS AFTER AG PROCESSING INC A COOPERATIVE FILES THAT PETITION. | ||
| | | |
| Decision Attachments | |||
| |||
| | ||
| 7 KB | |||
| Approximate download time at 28.8 kb: 15 Seconds | ||
 Note:If you do not have Acrobat Reader, or if you have problems reading our files with your current version of Acrobat Reader, the latest version of Acrobat Reader is available free at www.adobe.com. | |||
| Full Text of Decision | | | |
| | | |
|
41088 SERVICE DATE – LATE RELEASE SEPTEMBER 14, 2010 DO SURFACE TRANSPORTATION BOARD DECISION Docket No. FD 35387 AG PROCESSING INC A COOPERATIVE—PETITION FOR DECLARATORY ORDER Decided: September 13, 2010 On July 20, 2010, Ag Processing Inc A Cooperative (Ag Processing) filed a petition for declaratory order challenging one part of a Norfolk Southern Railway Company (NSR) tariff that addresses rail cars that are loaded in excess of their weight limits. Specifically, Ag Processing is concerned about how the tariff treats cars that are overloaded because of weather conditions. NSR notified the Board that it had amended the controversial language and wanted to discuss the change with Ag Processing. Accordingly, NSR asked that the Board make its reply to Ag Processing’s petition due on August 23, 2010. The Board granted this request in a decision served on August 6, 2010. On August 23, 2010, NSR filed an answer to Ag Processing’s July 20 petition. On the same day, Ag Processing filed an amended petition. By letter filed on September 10, 2010, NSR alerts the Board that Ag Processing will file another amended petition on or around September 17, 2010. NSR asks that the Board make its reply to the forthcoming petition due 20 days after Ag Processing files that petition. Counsel for Ag Processing concurs in this request. The request is reasonable, and it will be granted. NSR’s reply is due 20 days after Ag Processing files its forthcoming amended petition. It is ordered: 1. NSR’s request is granted, and its reply to the forthcoming petition is due 20 days after Ag Processing files that petition. 2. This decision is effective on its date of service. By the Board, Rachel D. Campbell, Director, Office of Proceedings. | |||